welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Richard David Yovanovich
Richard David Yovanovich
Richard David Yovanovich
Visitors: 61
0
Bar #782599(FL)     License for 36 years; Member in Good Standing
Naples FL

Are you Richard David Yovanovich? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

98-000324GM  DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs COLLIER COUNTY  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 1998
The issue is whether the plan amendments adopted by Ordinances 97-56, 97-59, 97-61, 97-63, 97-64, 97-66, and 97-67 are in compliance with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code.Evaluation and Appraisal Report plan amendments are not in compliance.
02-003795GM  FRANCIS D. HUSSEY, JR. AND MARY PAT HUSSEY vs COLLIER COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 2002
The issue in these cases is whether the Collier County (County) Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted through Collier County Ordinance Number 02-32 ("the Rural Fringe Amendments" or "the Amendments") on June 19, 2002, are "in compliance," as defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.Challenge to Collier County`s Rural Fringe Amendments did not prove they were unsupported by data and analysis or otherwise inconsistent with compliance criteria.
02-003796GM  THE 15,000 COALITION, INC. AND CENTURY DEVELOPMENT OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. vs COLLIER COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 2002
The issue in these cases is whether the Collier County (County) Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted through Collier County Ordinance Number 02-32 ("the Rural Fringe Amendments" or "the Amendments") on June 19, 2002, are "in compliance," as defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.Challenge to Collier County`s Rural Fringe Amendments did not prove they were unsupported by data and analysis or otherwise inconsistent with compliance criteria.
02-003090GM  EMERALD LAKE RESIDENTS` ASSOCIATION, INC. vs COLLIER COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2002
Whether the amendments to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and text of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan adopted by Ordinance No. 02-24 on May 14, 2002, which, among other plan amendments, created the "Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict" and applied it to one parcel within Collier County, are "in compliance" as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes. (All references to Florida Statutes are to the 2001 version unless otherwise indicated.)Petitioner did not prove that Collier County approval of plan amendment which created new subdistrict for a 23-acre parcel was not subject to fair debate.
93-001490  IN RE: PELICAN MARSH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs *  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 1993
Whether the petition of Westinghouse Communities of Naples, Inc., to establish the Pelican Marsh Community Development District in Collier County, Florida, meets the requirements of Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes.Uncontraverted evidence established that proposed community development district met criteria.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer