Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Robert Alan Crabill
Robert Alan Crabill
Visitors: 59
0
Bar #134473(FL)     License for 27 years
Orlando FL

Are you Robert Alan Crabill? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

00-002938PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs RONALD J. POWELL  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 18, 2000
Did Respondent commit the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated April 11, 2000, and if so, what discipline is appropriate?There was clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(h)2(k), F.S.
00-002939PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs EARL HENRY BENJAMIN  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 18, 2000
The issue in this case is whether Respondent violated Sections 489.119(2), 489.124(2), 489.129(1)(n) and (p), and 489.1425(1), Florida Statutes (1999) (hereinafter, "Florida Statutes"), respectively, by: engaging in contracting as a business organization without applying for a certificate of authority through a qualifying agent and under a fictitious name; failing to notify Petitioner of the mailing address and telephone number of the certificate holder or registrant; committing incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting; proceeding on a job without obtaining applicable building permits and inspections; and failing to provide a written statement explaining the consumer's rights under the Construction Industries Recovery Fund (the "Fund").Roofer who repaired 2 roofs and was unable to correct leaks should be fined $3,200 pay costs of $690.40, and pay restitution of $15,000.
00-002940PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs EARL HENRY BENJAMIN  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 18, 2000
The issue in this case is whether Respondent violated Sections 489.119(2), 489.124(2), 489.129(1)(n) and (p), and 489.1425(1), Florida Statutes (1999) (hereinafter, "Florida Statutes"), respectively, by: engaging in contracting as a business organization without applying for a certificate of authority through a qualifying agent and under a fictitious name; failing to notify Petitioner of the mailing address and telephone number of the certificate holder or registrant; committing incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting; proceeding on a job without obtaining applicable building permits and inspections; and failing to provide a written statement explaining the consumer's rights under the Construction Industries Recovery Fund (the "Fund").Roofer who repaired 2 roofs and was unable to correct leaks should be fined $3,200 pay costs of $690.40, and pay restitution of $15,000.
00-001858  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs MICHAEL JOSEPH SALVATORE  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 02, 2000
The issue is whether Respondent's license as a Certified Building Contractor should be disciplined for the reasons set forth in the Administrative Complaint.Failure to complete job, return money, pull permit, contract in proper name, and give notification of Recovery Fund constituted misconduct in the practice of contracting.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer