Orange FL and Real estate Lawyers | Robert William Peacock, -- eLawyers

97-000337 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MOHAMMAD FATHI ABDEL-HAMEED (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 21, 1997

Whether, as alleged in the administrative complaints, disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license to practice as a physician, based on separate violations of the following statutes for each patient as indicated below: DOAH Case No. 97-0337 Patient Statute T. D. 458.331(1)(g), 458.331(1)(t) F. R.-1 458.331(1)(g), 458.331(1)(m), 458.331(1)(t) S. M. 458.331(1)(g), 458.331(1)(t) F. R.-2 458.331(1)(g), 458.331(1)(m), 458.331(1)(t) T. M. 458.331(1)(g), 458.331(1)(t), 766.411 L. F. 458.329, 458.331(1)(j), 458.331(1)(m), 458.331(1)(t), 458.331)1)(x) C. G. 458.331(1)(k), 458.331(12)(m), 458.331(1)(n), 458.331(1)(t) DOAH Case No. 97-0338 J. S. 458.331(1)(m), 458.331(1)(q), 458.331(1)(t).Respondent guilty of malpractice in delivery of infant; failure to appropriately diagnose patient's condition, four counts; failure to maintain medical records, four counts; not guilty on eight counts, including sexual misconduct.

96-000977F LEONARD E. MASTERS vs BOARD OF MEDICINE (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 26, 1996

The issues for determination in this proceeding are: (a) whether the Petitioner was a small business party as defined in Section 57.111(3), Florida Statutes, when Respondent initiated agency action against him; and, if so, (b) whether Respondent was substantially justified in initiating disciplinary proceedings against Petitioner, a licensed physician, in DOAH Case Number 94- 2941, AHCA Case Numbers 90-8689 and 90-8804.Petitioner was a small business party but Respondent was substantially justified in issuing administrative complaint.

96-000674 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JAGDEEP VAMANRAI BHUTA (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 06, 1996

The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Section 458.331(1), Florida Statutes (1995) 1/ by failing to practice medicine according to the applicable standard of care, by performing unnecessary and improper breast examinations on eight patients, by failing to document the examinations in his medical records, and by documenting tests that were not performed, and, if so, what, if any, penalty should be imposed pursuant to Florida Administrative Rule 59R-8.001. 2/Doctor, who performed sixteen unnecessary and improper breast exams, should have license suspended for three years, be fined $105,000, be placed on probation, be placed in a Continuing Program of Education (CPE) and have practice permit restricted.

97-002349 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH vs THOMAS D. HOARD (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 15, 1997

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint. If so, what punitive action should be taken against him.Record evidence did not sustain charge that urologist misdiagnosed patient as having lesions in her bladder.

96-004220 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs HERBERT RICHARD SLAVIN (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 06, 1996

The issue for determination is whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the administrative complaint and, if so, what action should be taken.Respondent was not practicing medicine in violation of previous order by Petitioner in a disciplinary action. Recommend dismissal of administrative complaint.

96-001217 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs DANIEL J. ROSENTHAL (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 05, 1996

This is a license discipline case in which the Petitioner seeks to take disciplinary action against the Respondent on the basis of alleged violations of paragraphs (m) and (t) of Section 458.331(1), Florida Statutes. By stipulation the parties have resolved all issues other than a determination as to what penalty is appropriate.Physician's efforts to prevent possibility of future violations warrants some mitigation of penalty.

94-005411 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs SAMIR NAJJAR (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 1994

The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Respondent is guilty of certain alleged violations of Section 458.331(1)(m), (q), and (t), Florida Statutes, concerning his treatment of one patient during 1984 and 1985 and, if so, what penalty is warranted.Petitioner failed to show Respondent departed from practice standards even though patient became dependent on medication because it was only effective treatment. The records justified it.

94-003274 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs RONALD L. COHEN (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 13, 1994

Whether Respondent violated Sections 458.331(1)(g), (j), (m), (q), and (t), Florida Statutes, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Dr. admitted having affair with petitioner. Doctor prescribed valium and prozac without justification and failed to keep records.

95-005535 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs CHARLES HARRY KENT (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 09, 1995

The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent committed the violation alleged in the corrected administrative complaint; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Doctor failed to pay fine therefore license should be suspended.

94-002116 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN AUGUST ORTOLANI (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 20, 1994

The issue for determination is whether Respondent, a licensed physician, committed violations of Chapter 458, Florida Statutes, sufficient to justify the imposition of disciplinary sanctions against his license.Lack of record documentation by physician constitutes failure to maintain record justifing course of treatment.

Robert William Peacock, Jr.