Orange FL and Real estate Lawyers | Robert William Peacock, -- eLawyers

05-003165PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs STEVEN WAYNE KINSEY, M.D. (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 31, 2005

Should the Board of Medicine (the Board) discipline Respondent's license to practice medicine in Florida, based upon allegations that he violated Sections 456.072(1)(bb), and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003), in the care and treatment of Patient H.J.?The foreign body left in the patient did not meet the statutory definition for a violation.

99-003723 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN CHRISTOPHER CHAUVIN, M.D. (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 01, 1999

Whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license to practice medicine, based on alleged violation of Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes.Evidence showed Respondent treated and properly tested patient`s epigastric and chest pains, but failed in not admitting patient to hospital when heart seizure could not be ruled out. Therefore, violated standard of care on appropriate time to admit.

00-001246 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs OSCAR DIAZ, T. T. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 23, 2000

Whether Respondent is guilty of being in violation of Section 468.365(1)(x), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him.Revocation of respiratory therapist`s license recommended where therapist, due to cocaine dependency, not able to skillfully and safely deliver respiratory care services.

01-003212PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MARC S. SCHNEIDER, M.D. (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2001

The ultimate issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Section 458.331(1)(m) and (t), Florida Statutes (1997), respectively, by failing to keep medical records that justify the course of treatment and by failing to practice medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances; and, if so, what penalty, if any, should be imposed against Respondent's license to practice medicine. (All chapter and section references are to Florida Statutes (1997) unless otherwise stated.)Plastic surgeon who performed procedure different than authorized in written consent; did not maintain records justifying difference; and used overly large implants should be fined $5,000, reprimanded, and complete continuing professional education.

00-003100PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs STEPHEN SCHENTHAL, M.D. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 2000

When the hearing commenced, the parties through counsel agreed that sufficient facts would be presented to sustain a finding of violations of Counts One, Two, and Three a. and b., within the Administrative Complaint drawn by the State of Florida, Department of Health, Case No. 1999-53281. It was left for the fact finder to portray those facts consistent with the agreement. The parties presented their cases and facts have been found on the record which promote findings of violations of the aforementioned counts. In addition, as envisioned by the parties and accepted by the undersigned, determinations concerning recommended sanctions for the violations have been made on the record presented at hearing.1Physician engaged in an inappropriate relationship with sexual overtones with his patient.

98-003728 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ROLANDO ROBERTO SANCHEZ (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 24, 1998

The issue presented for decision in this case is whether Respondent should be subjected to discipline for the violations of Chapter 458, Florida Statutes, alleged in the Administrative Complaint issued by Petitioner on July 28, 1998.Physician found to have violated Section 458.331(1)(p), Florida Statutes, for performing central venous catheter procedure on wrong patient.

99-002997 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ROBERT V. CARIDA, M.D. (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 12, 1999

Whether the Respondent committed the violations set forth in the Administrative Complaint dated November 2, 1998, and, if so, the penalty which should be imposed.Department of Health failed to prove doctor practiced medicine below accepted standard of care. Department proved doctor failed to keep medical records of patient`s office visit because the notations on the patient`s chart were illegible.

96-000024 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LEHEL KADOSA (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 04, 1996

The issue for determination in this case is whether Respondent's license to practice medicine should be revoked or otherwise disciplined for the alleged violations of Section 458.331(1), Florida Statutes, set forth in the Administrative Complaint.Physician`s advertising found to be deceptive where patient was charged for physical examination despite promise of free initial consultation; physician also claimed board certification in unrecognized areas and ordered unnecessary test for patient.

96-001896 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs BRIAN HARDCASTLE (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 19, 1996

The issue in this case is whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license to practice medicine in the State of Florida, for committing the violations alleged in an Administrative Complaint entered March 26, 1996.Physician violated standard of practice and failed to keep adequate records.

97-003363 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs SAM NAJJAR (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 21, 1997

Whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license to practice medicine based on: The allegations of the Administrative Complaint in DOAH Case No. 97-3363, pertaining to patient R.W., of violations of Sections 458.331(1)(q), Florida Statutes, [failure to appropriately prescribe in the best interest of the patient]; 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, [failure to practice medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances]; and Section 458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes, [failure to keep medical records justifying the course of treatment of the patient during his care of the patient]; and The allegations of the Administrative Complaint in DOAH Case No. 97-3442, pertaining to patient N.W., of violating Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, [failure to practice medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances].Medical doctor violated "good records" requirement but there was no flawed standard of care or failure to appropriately prescribe legend drugs . No violation where hospital failed to convey "red flag" diagnostic material to Respondent

Robert William Peacock, Jr.