welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Rodger L Spink
Rodger L Spink
Rodger L Spink
Visitors: 50
0
Bar #165391(FL)     License for 51 years
Cooper City FL

Are you Rodger L Spink? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  Ago  (1978)
Florida Attorney General Reports Filed: Mar. 24, 1978
Earl Rich Highlands County Clerk of Courts Sebring QUESTION: Should a garnishee be paid the $10 deposited by the garnishor pursuant to s. 77.28 , F. S., even though no demand therefor is made SUMMARY: Although the clerk may notify the garnishee (without charge) of his right to demand the $10 deposited into the registry of the court pursuant to s. 77.28 , F. S., for garnishee's attorney's fees, there must be a demand therefor made by the garnishee before disbursement of such deposit is made by th..
76-1041  Horowitz v. American Motorist Ins. Co.  (1977)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 23, 1977 Citations: 343 So. 2d 1305
343 So. 2d 1305 (1977) Noel HOROWITZ and Sadie Horowitz, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. AMERICAN MOTORIST INSURANCE COMPANY et al., a Corporation, Appellees. No. 76-1041. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 23, 1977. Rehearing Denied April 21, 1977. John B. Cechman of Goldberg, Rubinstein & Buckley, Fort Myers, for appellants. David W. Miner, of Mann, Fay and Price, Bradenton, for appellees. *1306 SCHEB, Judge. Is a chiropractor competent to give expert testimony under t..
2D08-462  Grooms v. State  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 16, 2008 Citations: 978 So. 2d 167
978 So. 2d 167 (2008) GROOMS v. STATE. No. 2D08-462. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. April 16, 2008. Decision without published opinion. App.dismissed.
81-002798  DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs. FREDERICK A. LEWIS; CHINELLY REAL ESTATE, INC.; ET AL.  (1981)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 14, 1982
Whether respondents' licenses as real estate brokers and salespersons should be disciplined for alleged misrepresentation, fraud, breach of trust, culpable negligence, concealment, false promises, false pretenses, dishonest dealing by trick, scheme, or device, violation of a duty imposed by statute and contract, and aiding and conspiring with other persons engaged in misconduct-- all in violation of Section 475.25(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1981).Respondents were not guilty of dealing on false pretenses or fraud in securing escrow shortage with own funds with knowledge of all parties.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer