welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Roger William Sims
Roger William Sims
Roger William Sims
Visitors: 61
0
Bar #194803(FL)     License for 49 years
Orlando FL

Are you Roger William Sims? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 1.01, 120.52, 120.569, 120.57, 120.574, 120.595, 120.68, 163.3161, 163.3167, 163.3177, 163.3180, 163.3184, 163.3245, 163.3248, 187.201, 211.32, 267.061, 337.0261, 373.016, 373.019, 373.042, 373.069, 373.086, 373.1131, 373.403, 373.413, 373.4136, 373.414, 373.421, 373.430, 378.202, 378.203, 378.205, 378.207, 378.208, 378.209, 378.212, 380.06, 403.031, 403.087, 403.088, 403.201, 403.412, 57.105

Florida Administrative Code: 40D-1.102, 40D-1.602, 40D-1.604, 40D-4.031, 40D-4.091, 40D-4.201, 40D-4.301, 40D-4.302, 40D-4.331, 40D-4.351, 40D-40.031, 40D-40.112, 40D-40.331, 40D-40.351, 40D-40.381, 40D-8.041, 62-302.300, 62-302.530, 62-330.200, 62-340.300, 62-340.450, 62-340.600, 62-345.600, 62-4.242, 62C-16.0021, 62C-16.0041, 62C-16.0045, 62C-16.0051, 62C-16.0075, 62C-16.0091

03-000792  CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-000804  ALAN R. BEHRENS vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-000805  DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC. vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-001610  DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC., AND ALAN BEHRENS vs IMC PHOSPHATES, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 24, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
02-004134  CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 21, 2002
The issues are whether the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) should: grant the application filed by IMC Phosphates Company (IMC) for modification of the approved Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP) for the Four Corners/Lonesome Mine, IMC-FCL-CPD; and issue a Consolidated Environmental Resource/Wetland Resource Permit No. 0155875-004 (Draft Permit) to mine phosphate and reclaim land on the Altman Tract in the northeastern corner of Manatee County.Based on findings as to disputed facts, phosphate mine reclamation plan did not maintain or improve biological functions of wetlands impacted (and had other defects); mitigation for wetland impacts was insufficient; other required assurances not given.
01-003535  CYNTHIA VALENCIC vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND SARASOTA COUNTY  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 06, 2001
The issue is whether Sarasota County's application for a permit authorizing the construction of a Class V, Group 3 aquifer storage and recovery well system at the Central County Water Reclamation Facility in Sarasota, Florida, should be approved.Operational concerns of a Class V injection well should not be considered in an application for a contruction permit. These concerns are addressed in the application for operating permits. Permit is approved.
01-001080  MANASOTA-88, INC. vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2001
Petitioners and Intervenors challenge the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department) Notice of Intent to Issue Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 0142476-003 to IMC Phosphates Company (IMC) for proposed mining of phosphate at the Manson Jenkins Property (Property) located in Manatee County, Florida. The ultimate issue is whether IMC has provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes, and relevant rules promulgated thereunder, have been satisfied justifying entitlement to an ERP.IMC provided reasonable assurances that its proposed phosphate mining, reclamation, and associated activities on the Manson Jenkins Property in Manasota County would not violate applicable statutes and rules and is not contrary to the public interest.
01-001081  CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2001
Petitioners and Intervenors challenge the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department) Notice of Intent to Issue Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 0142476-003 to IMC Phosphates Company (IMC) for proposed mining of phosphate at the Manson Jenkins Property (Property) located in Manatee County, Florida. The ultimate issue is whether IMC has provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes, and relevant rules promulgated thereunder, have been satisfied justifying entitlement to an ERP.IMC provided reasonable assurances that its proposed phosphate mining, reclamation, and associated activities on the Manson Jenkins Property in Manasota County would not violate applicable statutes and rules and is not contrary to the public interest.
01-001082  DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC., AND ALAN BEHRENS vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2001
Petitioners and Intervenors challenge the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department) Notice of Intent to Issue Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 0142476-003 to IMC Phosphates Company (IMC) for proposed mining of phosphate at the Manson Jenkins Property (Property) located in Manatee County, Florida. The ultimate issue is whether IMC has provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes, and relevant rules promulgated thereunder, have been satisfied justifying entitlement to an ERP.IMC provided reasonable assurances that its proposed phosphate mining, reclamation, and associated activities on the Manson Jenkins Property in Manasota County would not violate applicable statutes and rules and is not contrary to the public interest.
92-000953  ALAN R. BEHRENS vs CONSOLIDATED MINERALS, INC., AND SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 1992
Whether the Southwest Florida Water Management District ("District") should renew and modify an existing water use permit held by Consolidated Minerals, Inc. ("CMI") authorizing groundwater withdrawals at CMI's proposed "Pine Level" phosphate mine operation in DeSoto County, Florida. Whether the water use requested in CMI's permit renewal application meets all the criteria specified in Rule 40D-2.301, Florida Administrative Code ("F.A.C"), with the exception of 40D-2.301(1)(d), F.A.C.; and Whether CMI is exempt from the District's surface water management system permitting requirements as contained in Rule 40D-2.301(1)(d), F.A.C.Applicant for water use permit failed to provide reasonable assurances that use will not cause adverse impact to water resources and environment.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer