welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Ronda Lynne Moore
Ronda Lynne Moore
Ronda Lynne Moore
Visitors: 94
0
Bar #676411(FL)     License for 22 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Ronda Lynne Moore? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

13-004590BID  JACKSONVILLE SOUND AND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 22, 2013
At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent, Department of Management Services (“DMS"), acted contrary to the agency's governing statutes, rules or policies, or the bid specifications in its proposed decision to award the contract for Invitation to Bid No. MSFM-13002020 (the "ITB") to Intervenor Future Computer Systems, LLC ("FCS").Petitioner failed to prove that agency's interpretation of bid specification regarding experience in installing, programming and maintaining fire alarm control panels was contrary to agency's governing statutes, rules or policies.
13-002027  OSCAR WALKER vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2013
Whether Petitioner is entitled to receive retroactive Health Insurance Subsidy (HIS) payments from the Florida Retirement System (FRS) in addition to those already received. Secondarily, was FRS required to notify or remind Petitioner of the option to apply for the HIS benefit in a manner other than regular mail to his address of record?The Division of Retirement is under no duty to notify retiree by certified mail or telephone of the opportunity to apply for health insurance subsidy. Regular mail to address-of-record is sufficient.
12-002021  HIGHWAY 60 AND 301 CENTER, INC. vs BIG BEND CENTER, LLC, ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC., AND SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 11, 2012
The issues to be determined in this case are whether Petitioner Highway 60 and 301 Center, Inc., has standing to challenge the proposed Environmental Resource Permit issued to Respondent Big Bend Center, LLC, by Respondent Southwest Florida Water Management District ("District"), and, if so, whether Big Bend Center is entitled to issuance of the proposed permit.It is recommended that the petition be dismissed because Petitioner failed to demonstrate standing.
10-002683  OUT OF BOUNDS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 18, 2010
The issue in this case is whether the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) should issue a permit to Out of Bounds, Inc. (Out of Bounds, or applicant), to construct, operate, and close a construction and demolition debris disposal facility (C&D facility) in Hernando County.Applicant for C&D landfill permit did not provide reasonable assurance that no liner was needed and that potable wells within 500 feet were protected.
10-002987  ROBERT E. MCCUNE AND HERNANDO SSK, LLC vs OUT OF BOUNDS INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 01, 2010
The issue in this case is whether the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) should issue a permit to Out of Bounds, Inc. (Out of Bounds, or applicant), to construct, operate, and close a construction and demolition debris disposal facility (C&D facility) in Hernando County.Applicant for C&D landfill permit did not provide reasonable assurance that no liner was needed and that potable wells within 500 feet were protected.
10-004179  COYOTE LAND CO., INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 28, 2010
The issue is whether to approve Coyote Land Company, Inc.'s (Coyote's) applications for renewal permits to continue construction and operation of two construction and demolition debris facilities and one solid waste processing facility located in Santa Rosa County, Walton County, and Bay County, respectively.Applications for renewal of 3 permits for waste disposal facilities denied on ground applicant is an irresponsible applicant.
10-009445  COYOTE LAND CO, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 05, 2010
The issue is whether to approve Coyote Land Company, Inc.'s (Coyote's) applications for renewal permits to continue construction and operation of two construction and demolition debris facilities and one solid waste processing facility located in Santa Rosa County, Walton County, and Bay County, respectively.Applications for renewal of 3 permits for waste disposal facilities denied on ground applicant is an irresponsible applicant.
10-009448  COYOTE LAND CO, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 05, 2010
The issue is whether to approve Coyote Land Company, Inc.'s (Coyote's) applications for renewal permits to continue construction and operation of two construction and demolition debris facilities and one solid waste processing facility located in Santa Rosa County, Walton County, and Bay County, respectively.Applications for renewal of 3 permits for waste disposal facilities denied on ground applicant is an irresponsible applicant.
06-002235  DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION vs JOHN J. D`HONDT  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 22, 2006
Whether Respondent, John J. D'Hondt, as a licensed operator, should be disciplined for violations of Florida Administrative Code Rule 62-602.650(2), (4) and (4)(f).Respondent failed to timely submit a response and keep log books as required.
06-001245EF  LANIGER ENTERPRISES OF AMERICA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2006
The issue in this case is whether Respondent Laniger Enterprises of America, Inc. (Laniger), is liable to Petitioner Department of Environmental Protection (Department) for penalties and costs for the violations alleged in the Department's Notice of Violation, Orders for Corrective Action, and Administrative Penalty Assessment (NOV).Respondent shall pay a penalty of $1,500 for operating a package wastewater treatment plant without a permit, $2,500 for failing to submit certain reports, and $1,000 for Respondent`s costs.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer