welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Ryland Terry Rigsby
Ryland Terry Rigsby
Ryland Terry Rigsby
Visitors: 127
0
Bar #202045(FL)     License for 50 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Ryland Terry Rigsby? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

02-003235CON  TARPON SPRINGS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION, INC., D/B/A HELEN ELLIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., D/B/A NORTH BAY HOSPITAL  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 14, 2002
Whether the certificate of need (CON) applications filed by New Port Richey Hospital, Inc., d/b/a Community Hospital of New Port Richey (Community Hospital) (CON No. 9539), and Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc., d/b/a North Bay Hospital (North Bay) (CON No. 9538), each seeking to replace and relocate their respective general acute care hospital, satisfy, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule criteria.Respondent`s application to relocate its hospital five miles away satisfies, on balance, the rule and statutory criteria. Petitioner`s application does not.
02-003236CON  TRUSTEES OF MEASE HOSPITAL, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND NEW PORT RICHEY HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF NEW PORT RICHEY  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 14, 2002
Whether the certificate of need (CON) applications filed by New Port Richey Hospital, Inc., d/b/a Community Hospital of New Port Richey (Community Hospital) (CON No. 9539), and Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc., d/b/a North Bay Hospital (North Bay) (CON No. 9538), each seeking to replace and relocate their respective general acute care hospital, satisfy, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule criteria.Respondent`s application to relocate its hospital five miles away satisfies, on balance, the rule and statutory criteria. Petitioner`s application does not.
02-003237CON  TRUSTEES OF MEASE HOSPITAL, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., D/B/A NORTH BAY HOSPITAL  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 14, 2002
Whether the certificate of need (CON) applications filed by New Port Richey Hospital, Inc., d/b/a Community Hospital of New Port Richey (Community Hospital) (CON No. 9539), and Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc., d/b/a North Bay Hospital (North Bay) (CON No. 9538), each seeking to replace and relocate their respective general acute care hospital, satisfy, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule criteria.Respondent`s application to relocate its hospital five miles away satisfies, on balance, the rule and statutory criteria. Petitioner`s application does not.
02-003515CON  MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., D/B/A NORTH BAY HOSPITAL vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND NEW PORT RICHEY HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF NEW PORT RICHEY  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 10, 2002
Whether the certificate of need (CON) applications filed by New Port Richey Hospital, Inc., d/b/a Community Hospital of New Port Richey (Community Hospital) (CON No. 9539), and Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc., d/b/a North Bay Hospital (North Bay) (CON No. 9538), each seeking to replace and relocate their respective general acute care hospital, satisfy, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule criteria.Respondent`s application to relocate its hospital five miles away satisfies, on balance, the rule and statutory criteria. Petitioner`s application does not.
02-003232CON  MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., D/B/A NORTH BAY HOSPITAL vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND NEW PORT RICHEY HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF NEW PORT RICHEY  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 14, 2002
Whether the certificate of need (CON) applications filed by New Port Richey Hospital, Inc., d/b/a Community Hospital of New Port Richey (Community Hospital) (CON No. 9539), and Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc., d/b/a North Bay Hospital (North Bay) (CON No. 9538), each seeking to replace and relocate their respective general acute care hospital, satisfy, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule criteria.Respondent`s application to relocate its hospital five miles away satisfies, on balance, the rule and statutory criteria. Petitioner`s application does not.
02-003233CON  NEW PORT RICHEY HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF NEW PORT RICHEY vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., D/B/A NORTH BAY HOSPITAL  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 14, 2002
Whether the certificate of need (CON) applications filed by New Port Richey Hospital, Inc., d/b/a Community Hospital of New Port Richey (Community Hospital) (CON No. 9539), and Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc., d/b/a North Bay Hospital (North Bay) (CON No. 9538), each seeking to replace and relocate their respective general acute care hospital, satisfy, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule criteria.Respondent`s application to relocate its hospital five miles away satisfies, on balance, the rule and statutory criteria. Petitioner`s application does not.
02-003234CON  TARPON SPRINGS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION, INC., D/B/A HELEN ELLIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND NEW PORT RICHEY, INC., D/B/A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 14, 2002
Whether the certificate of need (CON) applications filed by New Port Richey Hospital, Inc., d/b/a Community Hospital of New Port Richey (Community Hospital) (CON No. 9539), and Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc., d/b/a North Bay Hospital (North Bay) (CON No. 9538), each seeking to replace and relocate their respective general acute care hospital, satisfy, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule criteria.Respondent`s application to relocate its hospital five miles away satisfies, on balance, the rule and statutory criteria. Petitioner`s application does not.
02-000575RX  SOUTHERN BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF FLORIDA, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 15, 2002
Whether Section (2) of Rule 59C-1.012(2), Florida Administrative Code (the "CON Administrative Hearing Procedures Rule" or the "Rule") constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority? Whether Section (2) of the Rule, in effect, was repealed July 1, 1998, by the adoption of the Uniform Rules of Procedure?Section (2) of CON Administrative Procedure Rule is neither an invalid exercise of legislative authority nor repealed by operation of the statute on the Uniform Rules of Procedure.
01-002526RP  BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., AND ST. MAR vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 29, 2001
Whether proposed rule amendments to Rule 59C- 1.033(7)(c) and (7)(d), Florida Administrative Code, published in the Notice of Change on June 15, 2001, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Whether the proposed rule is invalid due to the absence of a provision specifying when the amendments will apply to the review of certificate of need applications to establish open heart surgery programs.
01-002665RP  BETHESDA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 2001
Whether proposed rule amendments to Rule 59C- 1.033(7)(c) and (7)(d), Florida Administrative Code, published in the Notice of Change on June 15, 2001, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Whether the proposed rule is invalid due to the absence of a provision specifying when the amendments will apply to the review of certificate of need applications to establish open heart surgery programs.Open heart surgery proposed rule, with notice of change of county need methodology into county preference and access provisions, is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer