Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Sarah Hope Leigh Chien
Sarah Hope Leigh Chien
Visitors: 35
0
Bar #712116(FL)     License for 20 years; Member in Good Standing
Tampa FL

Are you Sarah Hope Leigh Chien? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

13-004739RX  CAPITAL CITY CHECK CASHING vs OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 10, 2013
Whether part of Florida Administrative Code Rule 69V- 560.704, particularly subsections (4)(d) and (5)(a), exceed Respondent’s rulemaking authority; enlarge, modify or contravene the specific provisions of law implemented; or are arbitrary or capricious, and thus, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority pursuant to section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes.Petitioner did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that sections of Florida Administrative Code Rule 69V-560.704 were an invalid exercise of Respondent's delegated legislative authority pursuant to section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes.
13-001834PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION vs DENNIS MAURICIO MERAZ  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 15, 2013
The issues are whether Respondent has violated Florida Administrative Code Rule 61J2-14.010(1) and section 475.25(1)(e) and (k), Florida Statutes, by failing to place immediately into escrow a security deposit of $5482; violated section 475.25(1)(u) by not being involved with the daily operations of Advantage International Realty, Inc. (AIR), by being hired to qualify AIR and receiving payment from AIR, and failing to direct, control or manage Jennifer Briceno, a sales associate employed by Respondent, while she provided real estate services to two individuals; and violated section 475.25(1)(d)1. by failing to refund $5308 upon demand by Mr. Mansour and Ms. Haddad on December 20, 2011. If so, an additional issue is the penalty that should be imposed.Respondent is liable for associate's not depositing money in escrow and for brokerage's not refunding money. Respondent is also liable for not supervising associate. His broker's license should be revoked for intent not to engage in brokerage business.
12-004134PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, REAL ESTATE COMMISSION vs JUDY LIMEKILLER  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 21, 2012
Whether Judy Limekiller (Respondent) committed the violation alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated August 30, 2012, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent signed documents for sellers and misrepresented her signatures as those of sellers, and therefore violated the statute.
11-004528PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION vs MONIQUE H. MORGAN  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 07, 2011
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint in the manner specified therein and, if so, what penalty should be imposed."Licensed real estate broker guilty of aiding an unlicensed entity to act as a broker and of failing to make available broker records requested by a Dept investigator; penalty recommended: $2000 fine; one year license suspension, and 2 years of probation.
10-006134  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs EARNEST KNIGHT  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 2010
Whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent based on alleged violations of section 489.127(1)(f)1, Florida Statutes, as charged in the Administrative Complaint.Respondent is guilty of unlicensed contracting. Recommend $2,000 fine, and $195.49 in investigative costs.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer