Miami-Dade FL Lawyers | Sergio Garcia-Pages -- eLawyers

Ex Parte Isaac Heller (1909)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: May 03, 1909 Citations: 214 U.S. 501

214 U.S. 501 (1909) Ex parte ISAAC HELLER, PETITIONER. No. _, Original. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted April 27, 1909. Decided May 3, 1909. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. *502 Mr. Abraham A. Berman for petitioner. Mr. Arthur v. Briesen submitted a brief for the respondent. Per Curiam: Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of mandamus denied.

313 Kwock Jan Fat v. White (1920)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 07, 1920 Citations: 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1376, 253 U.S. 454, 40 S. Ct. 566, 64 L. Ed. 1010

253 U.S. 454 (1920) KWOCK JAN FAT v. WHITE, AS COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION AT THE PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO. No. 313. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 30, 1920. Decided June 7, 1920. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *455 Mr. J.H. Ralston, with whom Mr. Dion R. Holm was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Stewart and Mr. H.S. Ridgely, for respondent, submitted. MR. JUSTICE CLARKE delivered the opinion of the court. In January, 1915,..

543 Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart (1920)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: May 17, 1920 Citations: 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1457, 253 U.S. 149, 40 S. Ct. 438, 64 L. Ed. 834

253 U.S. 149 (1920) KNICKERBOCKER ICE COMPANY v. STEWART. No. 543. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 16, 1919. Decided May 17, 1920. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. *150 Mr. Frank R. Savidge, with whom Mr. Frederick M. Thompson was on the briefs, for plaintiff in error. *152 Mr. E. Clarence Aiken, Deputy Attorney General of the State of New York, with whom Mr. Charles D. Newton, Attorney General of the State of New..

153 United States v. Stinson (1905)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 13, 1905 Citations: 1905 U.S. LEXIS 1210, 197 U.S. 200, 25 S. Ct. 426, 49 L. Ed. 724

197 U.S. 200 (1905) UNITED STATES v. STINSON. No. 153. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 25, 26, 1905. Decided March 13, 1905. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. *201 Mr. Marsden C. Burch, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom the Solicitor General and Mr. John B. *202 Simmons, Special Assistant United States Attorney, were on the brief, for the United States. Mr. R.M. Bashford, with whom Mr. John C. Spooner and Mr. A.L. Sanborn were on t..

185 El Paso Brick Co. v. McKnight (1914)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 06, 1914 Citations: 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1285, 233 U.S. 250, 34 S. Ct. 498, 58 L. Ed. 943

233 U.S. 250 (1914) EL PASO BRICK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. JOHN H. McKNIGHT. No. 185. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 22, 23, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. *255 Mr. Francis W. Clements, with whom Mr. Aldis B. Browne, Mr. Alexander Britton, Mr. Evans Browne, Mr. W.A. Hawkins and Mr. John Franklin were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Eugene S. Ives for appellee. MR. JUSTICE LAMAR, after making the foregoing statement, delive..

378 United States v. Moist (1914)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 05, 1914 Citations: 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1445, 231 U.S. 701, 34 S. Ct. 255, 58 L. Ed. 444

231 U.S. 701 (1914) UNITED STATES v. MOIST. No. 378. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted October 22, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. *702 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Denison for the United States. Mr. Roy D. Keehn for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court. This is an indictment under § 215 of the Criminal Code of March 4, 1909, c. 321, 35 Stat. 1130, for placing a le..

20 Cissna v. State of Tennessee (1916)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 10, 1916 Citations: 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1547, 246 U.S. 289, 38 S. Ct. 306, 62 L. Ed. 720

246 U.S. 289 38 S. Ct. 306 62 L. Ed. 720 CISSNA v. STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 20. Argued Nov. 10, 1916. Restored to Docket for Reargument, Dec. 11, 1916. Reargued Oct. 9 an 10, 1917. Decided March 11, 1918. Mr. Caruthers Ewing, of Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiff in error. Messrs. John P. Bullington, of Memphis, Tenn., and Frank M. Thompson, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for the State of Tennessee. Mr. Justice PITNEY delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 The state of Tennessee sued Cissna and others in a cour..

152 Northern Pacific R. Co. v. Wismer (1918)

Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 04, 1918 Citations: 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1546, 246 U.S. 283, 38 S. Ct. 240, 62 L. Ed. 716

246 U.S. 283 (1918) NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. WISMER, SUBSTITUTED FOR WISMER. No. 152. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 28, 29, 1918. Decided March 4, 1918. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Mr. Charles Donnelly, with whom Mr. Charles W. Bunn was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Kearful for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE CLARKE delivered the opinion of the court. This suit is one in ejectment by the Northern P..

Sergio Garcia-Pages