Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Shaddrick A Haston
Shaddrick A Haston
Visitors: 59
0
Bar #31067(FL)     License for 19 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Shaddrick A Haston? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

10-000496  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs ROBIN AUDIFFRED, D/B/A ST. FRANCIS PLACE, A/K/A FAMILY TIES ACLF, INC.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 01, 2010
Whether Respondent Robin Audifredd d/b/a St. Francis Place a/k/a Family Ties (Respondent) operated an assisted living facility without a required license and, if so, what is the appropriate penalty.The Agency proved that Respondent operated an assisted living facility without a license, but failed to prove its entitlement to a $115,000 fine sought in the Complaint.
09-000695  MIAMI JEWISH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR THE AGED, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 10, 2009
Florida Administrative Code Rule 59C-1.018(3)(c) requires that a request for an extension of a CON's validity period be made 15 days in advance of the period's expiration (the "15-Day Requirement.") The issue is whether the Agency for Health Care Administration should waive the 15-Day Requirement for Miami Jewish Home.Respondent should waive the 15-day requirement for submission of Miami Jewish Home`s request to extend the validity period of its CON that authorizes an LTCH in Miami-Dade County.
07-003403RP  PROMISE HEALTHCARE, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 2007
Petitioners proved that the proposed rule to include long-term care hospitals within the definition of tertiary health service is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
07-003404RP  SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL-ORLANDO, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 24, 2007
Petitioners proved that the proposed rule to include long-term care hospitals within the definition of tertiary health service is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
20-001469  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs KONA PROPERTIES, LLC, D/B/A GREENLEAF ASSISTED LIVING, LLC  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 20, 2020
Did Respondent, Kona Properties, LLC, d/b/a Greenleaf Assisted Living, LLC (Greenleaf), violate section 429.26(7), Florida Statutes (2019),1 and Florida Administrative Code Rule 59A-36.007(1) and, if so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count I) Did Greenleaf violate section 429.176 and 429.52(4) and (5) and rule 59A-36.010? If it did, what penalty should be imposed? (Count II) Did Greenleaf violate rule 59A-36.010(2) and, if so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count III) Should the Agency impose a survey fee upon Greenleaf pursuant to section 429.19(7)? If so, what amount of fee should be imposed? (Count IV) Did Greenleaf commit one or more Class I violations justifying revocation of its license under section 429.14(1)(e)1.? (Count V) Did Greenleaf violate the background screening requirements of sections 408.809, 429.174, and 435.06(2)(a) through (d)? If so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count VI) Did Greenleaf violate rule 59A-35.110 by not making timely adverse incident reports, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed? (Count VII)AHCA did not prove inadequate training, no background screening, that an adverse incident report was required, and a basis for survey fee imposition by clear & convincing evidence. Hearsay alone will not support a finding of fact.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer