Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Shannon Leah Novey
Shannon Leah Novey
Visitors: 34
0

Hourly Rates $275-475/hour

Bar #172730(FL)     License for 25 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Shannon Leah Novey? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

01-000189BID  SPRINT PAYPHONE SERVICES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 2001
Whether the proposal Petitioner submitted in response to Respondent's Request for Proposal No. 00-DC-7295 was non- responsive.Proposal submitted by Petitioner in response to Request for Proposals was non-responsive. Petitioner does not have standing to further pursue its protest of the agency`s proposed action. Petitioner`s bid protest should be dismissed.
00-003553RU  MEDIMPACT HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 2000
Whether the Department of Management Services ("DMS") or the ("Department") has an unpromulgated rule which states, in effect, that the Department will select the solicitation procurement method known as an Invitation to Negotiate when it is in the Department's best interests to do so even if rule requirements for the selection have not been met? Whether the statement contained in the Invitation to Negotiate (ITN Number-DSGI 00-001) issued in April 2000 by the Division of State Group Insurance ("DSGI") for the purchase of pharmacy benefits management services to the effect that "a late-submitted offer to negotiate will be returned unopened" is an unpromulgated rule? Whether, although not pled, the Petitioner proved at final hearing the existence of other unpromulgated rules?Statements contrary to agency rules are not statements of general applicability. They are statements with no applicability.
00-003900BID  MEDIMPACT HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF STATE GROUP INSURANCE  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 20, 2000
Among the many issues in Case No. 00-3900BID, there are three main issues: whether it was proper for the Division of State Group Insurance ("DSGI" or the "agency") to reject and return unopened the response of Petitioner MedImpact Healthcare Systems, Inc., to DSGI's Invitation to Negotiate (the "ITN") for pharmacy benefits management services? If not, and the response should have been accepted and opened, whether DSGI's selection of an ITN as the method for soliciting suppliers eligible to provide pharmacy benefits management services for DSGI is an issue properly in the case? Finally, whether Merck-Medco Managed Care L.L.C. ("MMMC") has standing to intervene in this proceeding?Division of State Group Insurance wrongly rejected a late-filed submission to an Invitation to Negotiate delivered late by Federal Express because of severe thunderstorms over Memphis, Tennessee.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer