Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Sharlee Hobbs Edwards
Sharlee Hobbs Edwards
Visitors: 37
0
Bar #30382(FL)     License for 18 years
Coral Gables FL

Are you Sharlee Hobbs Edwards? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :
4D09-3808  McDonald v. OUJEVOLK  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 04, 2010 Citations: 39 So. 3d 1272
39 So. 3d 1272 (2010) McDONALD v. OUJEVOLK. No. 4D09-3808. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. August 4, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.
2D09-1719  Pro Sound, Inc. v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Authority  (2009)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 14, 2009 Citations: 8 So. 3d 1142
8 So. 3d 1142 (2009) PRO SOUND, INC. v. SARASOTA-MANATEE AIRPORT AUTHORITY. No. 2D09-1719. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 14, 2009. Decision without published opinion. App.dismissed.
13-000865  AMERISURE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 14, 2013
The issues to be decided are: 1) whether Petitioner, Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company (Amerisure), is entitled to a credit or refund due to the elimination of credits by Respondent, Department of Financial Services (Respondent or the Department), that Amerisure claims accrued in the calendar year 2009 and should apply to future assessments owed to the Special Disability Trust Fund (SDTF) and the Workers? Compensation Administration Trust Fund (WCATF)(collectively the Trust Funds); 2) whether the elimination of these credits was accomplished by the Department?s application of a policy meeting the definition of a rule that has not been adopted through the chapter 120 rulemaking process; and 3) whether any refund or credit is barred by the statute of limitations in section 215.26, Florida Statutes.Petitioner entitled to reinstatement of credits toward future assessments due to workers' compensation trust funds. Two agency statements meet the definition of rule pursuant to section 120.52(16), Florida Statutes.
12-002917BID  MORPHOTRUST USA vs DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 07, 2012
Whether Respondent's intended award of a contract to Intervenor, pursuant to Invitation to Negotiate 024-12 (ITN), is contrary to Respondent's governing statutes, Respondent's rules and policies, or the specifications of the ITN?Petitioner failed in its burden of establishing grounds for protest of DHSMV's intended contract award to Intervenor.
09-003944RU  COVENTRY FIRST, LLC vs OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION AND FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 22, 2009
The issue is whether the guidelines set forth in the Specialty Product Administration Field Examination Policy Procedures (SPA Field Exam Policy), Viatical Settlement Provider Examination Manual (VSP Manual), Viatical Settlement Provider Examination Procedures (VSP Exam Procedures), and notice-of- examination letters constitute agency statements defined as rules but not adopted as such, in violation of Section 120.54, Florida Statutes.Petitioner did not show that Respondents' engagement letters and training manuals were unpromulgated rules.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer