Escambia FL Estate planning, Litigation and Real estate Lawy -- eLawyers

Stephanie Alexander

Visitors: 41

Bar #151432(FL) License for 26 years; Member in Good Standing

Pensacola FL

Are you Stephanie Alexander? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 1001.32, 1001.49, 1002.32, 1002.33, 1002.331, 1002.41, 1003.02, 1003.03, 1003.54, 1006.21, 1006.22, 1006.23, 1006.25, 1011.012, 1011.14, 1011.15, 1011.61, 1011.62, 1011.68, 1011.71, 1012.45, 1013.15, 1013.31, 1013.35, 1013.61, 1013.62, 1013.64, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.68, 120.74, 161.58, 163.01, 164.102, 164.1052, 164.1053, 164.1055, 164.1058, 186.504, 20.04, 200.065, 336.09, 336.10, 339.175, 447.309, 626.854, 75.06

Florida Administrative Code: 69B-220.201

14-004045RU RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL, INC., AND RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL AT TRADITION vs ST. LUCIE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 2017

Whether Petitioners, Renaissance Charter School, Inc., and Renaissance Charter School at Tradition, can be required by the St. Lucie County School Board ("School Board") to offer regular school busing to all eligible charter school students residing more than two miles from the charter school. Whether Petitioner, Renaissance Charter School at Tradition, breached its contract with the School Board by not providing transportation to students in accord with the parties' charter school contract and Florida Statutes. Whether School Board Policies 3.90 and 8.31 constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Whether the School Board has charter busing policies which amount to illegal, unadopted rules under chapter 120, Florida Statutes (2014).Charter school is not required to offer regular school busing to all students residing more than two miles from the charter school, and Charter School did not breach its charter or violate Florida law by failing to offer such school busing.

18-16804 CM Lab, Inc (1998)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Apr. 16, 1998 Citations: 221 B.R. 40

221 B.R. 40 (1998) In re Edward D. ECKERT, M.D. a/k/a Edward D. Eckert, Debtor. FLEMING COMPANIES, INC. d/b/a Fleming Foods, Inc. successor by merger to Malone & Hyde, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Edward David ECKERT, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 97-31509, Adversary No. 97-917. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. April 16, 1998. *41 *42 Lynn M. Gollin, Miami, FL, for Fleming Companies, Inc. Michael Bakst, West Palm Beach, FL, for Edward D. Eckert. OPINION LARRY L. LESSEN, Bankruptcy Judge. The issu..

90-1694 Diaz v. State (1992)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 01, 1992 Citations: 609 So. 2d 1337

609 So. 2d 1337 (1992) Alberto DIAZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 90-1694. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. December 1, 1992. *1338 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Louis Campbell, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ. COPE, Judge. Albert Diaz appeals his conviction and sentence for official misconduct. We affirm. In Sept..

98-3114 Mulato v. Mulato (1999)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 12, 1999 Citations: 734 So. 2d 477

734 So. 2d 477 (1999) Dorothy H. MULATO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Edward MULATO, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 98-3114. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. May 12, 1999. John H. Pelzer and Daniella Friedman of Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale for appellant/cross-appellee. Anthony J. Titone of Law Office of Anthony J. Titone, P.V., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee/cross-appellant. *478 WARNER, J. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9...

2D09-3817 YEGGE v. State (2009)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 05, 2009 Citations: 19 So. 3d 993

19 So. 3d 993 (2009) YEGGE v. STATE. No. 2D09-3817. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. October 5, 2009. Decision Without Published Opinion Appeal dismissed.

4D09-543 Diaz v. State (2010)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 19, 2010 Citations: 34 So. 3d 797

34 So. 3d 797 (2010) Luis J. DIAZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D09-543. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. May 19, 2010. *798 Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Timothy D. Kenison, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant *799 Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. TAYLOR, J. The defendant entered a plea of no contest to trafficking in heroin and poss..

12-000887 RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL, INC. vs LEON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 12, 2012

The issue is whether the School Board has the authority to include a provision in a charter that limits a charter school's annual capacity to the number of applications received as of a date certain (March 1) and whether that proposed enrollment cap is legal under Florida law.School Board's requirement that the charter contain an enrollment deadline does not violate charter school's flexibility or equitable treatment as contemplated by s. 1002.33(6), and is not an unadopted rule.

11-002183 TAMPA SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT CORP., D/B/A TRINITY SCHOOL FOR CHILDREN vs HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 29, 2011

Whether Respondent, Hillsborough County School Board (School Board), erred in denying the Petitioner's request to consolidate its two charter contracts into one charter agreement.Charter School properly invoked DOAH appeal, challenging School Board's refusal to allow two existing charter schools to consolidate; Two charters allowed to consolidate where facts show combining the two charters will result in financial efficiency.

10-002089RX AMERILOSS PUBLIC ADJUSTING CORP. vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 16, 2010

Whether Petitioner's Petition Seeking an Administrative Determination of the Invalidity of an Existing Rule (Petition) should be dismissed on the ground that the "challenged rule in this proceeding has been effectively repealed by the Florida Legislature by Section 626.854(11), Florida Statutes, effective October 1, 2008," as requested by Respondent.Rule challenge petition was dismissed where the challenged rule had been superceded by the statute.

08-001309RU THE RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL, INC., AND THE LEE CHARTER FOUNDATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 14, 2008

The issue is whether Respondent's policy relative to the applicability of the maximum class-size statute to charter schools is a rule as defined in Section 120.52(16), Florida Statutes, which has not been adopted as required by Section 120.54, Florida Statutes.1/Petitioners met their burden of proving that Respondent`s policy is a rule that has not been promulgated.