Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Stephen Michael Masterson
Stephen Michael Masterson
Visitors: 45
0
Bar #201014(FL)     License for 50 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Stephen Michael Masterson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :
17-001562  INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF DESIGN, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2017
The issue in this case is whether Petitioners qualify for an exemption from paying sales tax on the lease of real property under sections 212.0602 and 212.08(7), Florida Statutes (2013),1/ from July 1, 2010, through April 30, 2013.Petitioners proved that they qualified for an exemption from sales tax under section 212.0602.
17-001563  INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF MERCHANDISING AND DESIGN, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2017
The issue in this case is whether Petitioners qualify for an exemption from paying sales tax on the lease of real property under sections 212.0602 and 212.08(7), Florida Statutes (2013),1/ from July 1, 2010, through April 30, 2013.Petitioners proved that they qualified for an exemption from sales tax under section 212.0602.
15-004710  DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE vs WORLD CHAMPIONS AUTO, INC.  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 19, 2015
The issue is whether Respondent's Certificate of Registration 46-8015920490-4 should be revoked for the reasons stated in an Administrative Complaint for Revocation of Certificate of Registration (Administrative Complaint) issued by the Department of Revenue (Department) on July 17, 2015.Agency established by clear and convincing evidence that taxpayer violated Compliance Agreement. Revocation of certificate of registration recommended.
14-004052  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs RAUL TROCHE  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 2014
The issue in this case is whether Respondent violated provisions of statutes governing licensure of construction contractors and, if so, what penalties should be imposed.The Department proved by a preponderance of evidence that Respondent was engaged in construction contracting without a license.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer