Alachua FL Criminal defense, Medical malpractice and Motorcy -- eLawyers

97-000377 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ROBERT HUSON HUNSAKER (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 27, 1997

Whether the Respondent, a physician, committed the offenses alleged in the Administrative Complaint and the penalties, if any, that should be imposed.Doctor not guilty of sexual misconduct.

97-000721 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ERNESTO PINZON-REYES (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 1997

The issues are whether Respondent is guilty of violating the applicable standard of care; prescribing a legend drug other than in the course of his professional practice; failing to keep written medical records justifying the course of treatment of the patient; making deceptive, untrue, or fraudulent representations related to the practice of medicine or employed a trick or scheme in the practice of medicine; or practicing beyond the scope permitted by law or performed professional responsibilities that he knew or had reason to know he was incompetent to perform. If so, an additional issue is what penalty should be imposed.Recommended one-year suspension for Respondent`s falsification of medical record to show administration of potassium chloride by intravenous (IV) bag instead of by IV push.

96-002151 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs RAMESHCHANDRA BHAGWANDAS SHAH (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 06, 1996

The issue for determination in this case is whether Respondent violated certain provisions of Chapter 458, Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, whether Respondent’s license to practice medicine in the State of Florida should be revoked or otherwise disciplined.Evidence supported discipline of emergency room physician for failure to contact primary care physician of cardiac patient.

94-004628 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs KATHERINE ANNE HOOVER (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 17, 1994

The issue presented is whether Respondent is guilty of the allegations contained in the Administrative Complaint filed against her, and if so, what disciplinary action should be taken, if any.Failure of burden of proof that physician treating patients with intractable pain by using narcotics doing so inappropriately or in excessive amounts.

94-006352 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs PHILIP F. WATERMAN (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 27, 1995

The issues are whether Respondent is guilty of violations of Section 458.331(1)(k), (m), and (t) in the practice of medicine and, if so, what penalty the Board of Medicine should impose.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent violated applicable standard of care by failing to order tests/recheck at stated interval/or recheck if breast self-exam unusual.

95-002038 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN L. TYNER, JR. (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 27, 1995

The issue for consideration in this hearing is whether Respondent's license as a physician in Florida should be disciplined because of the matters alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed herein.Evidence not sufficient to show practice below standards but enough to show records kept did not justify treatment.

96-002016F SABIH KAYAN vs BOARD OF MEDICINE (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 02, 1996

The issue in this case is whether the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) prosecution of the Petitioner for alleged violations of the Medical Practices Act was "substantially justified" under the terms of Section 57.111, Fla. Stat. (1995), the Florida Equal Access to Justice Act.Probable Cause based on investigative report and expert opinion was ""substantial justification."" 2nd Probable Cause for amended Administrative Complaint irrelevant. Factual errors not obvious.

95-002467 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs PETER ALAGONA, JR. (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 15, 1995

The issues in this case are: (1) whether the Respondent is guilty of violating the Medical Practice Act, as charged in the Administrative Complaint, AHCA Case No. 93-01257; and, if so, (2) what discipline would be appropriate. The violations charged are: Count I, that the Respondent used the doctor- patient relationship to induce a patient to engage in sexual activity with him, and committed sexual misconduct, in violation of Section 458.329, Fla. Stat.; Count II, that the Respondent failed to practice medicine in accordance with required standards of care by not ordering the patient to receive mental health counseling but instead inappropriately allowing the patient to remain on Tylox, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(t), Fla. Stat.; Count III, that the Respondent failed to keep a written record of the drugs prescribed for the patient or the course of treatment for the patient, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(m), Fla. Stat.Petitioner did'nt prove sexual misconduct. Sex relation preceded doctor/patient relationship; Latter didn't induce former. Respondent used poor judgment and didn't keep proper records

95-001560 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs PATRICIA DEE G. STEPHENSON (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 30, 1995

Should Respondent Patricia Dee G. Stehpenson's license to practice medicine in the State of Florida be revoked, suspended or otherwise disciplined based on the allegations contained in the Administrative Complaint filed herein?Insufficient evidence to prove a violation of Florida Statute Section 458.331(1)(A).

95-001981 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN ISAAC DELGADO (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 26, 1995

The issue in this case is whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint are correct, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Evidence insufficient to prove violation by proper standard.

Steven Alvah Rothenburg