Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Steven Edward Stark
Steven Edward Stark
Visitors: 33
0
Bar #516864(FL)     License for 39 years; Member in Good Standing
Miami Beach FL

Are you Steven Edward Stark? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

03-003890  THE BISCAYNE INSTITUTE vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 21, 2003
Whether Petitioner is entitled under Florida’s workers’ compensation laws to payment for professional services to an injured worker for the billings identified by the three notices of disallowance at issue in this consolidated proceeding.Disallowance of payment for rehabilitation services that were not reasonable or medically necessary should be sustained.
03-001837  THE BISCAYNE INSTITUTE vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 19, 2003
Whether Petitioner is entitled under Florida’s workers’ compensation laws to payment for professional services to an injured worker for the billings identified by the three notices of disallowance at issue in this consolidated proceeding.Disallowance of payment for rehabilitation services that were not reasonable or medically necessary should be sustained.
03-001838  THE BISCAYNE INSTITUTE vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 19, 2003
Whether Petitioner is entitled under Florida’s workers’ compensation laws to payment for professional services to an injured worker for the billings identified by the three notices of disallowance at issue in this consolidated proceeding.Disallowance of payment for rehabilitation services that were not reasonable or medically necessary should be sustained.
03-002749N  JUANITA RUIZ AND MIGUEL ANGEL RUIZ, AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF MICHAEL A. RUIZ, A MINOR, AND JUANITA RUIZ AND MIGUEL ANGEL RUIZ, INDIVIDUALLY vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 2003
Whether Respondent's proposal to accept the claim as compensable should be approved. If so, the amount and manner of payment of the parental award, the amount owing for attorney's fees and costs incurred in pursuing the claim, and the amount owing for past expenses. Whether notice was accorded the patient, as contemplated by Section 766.16, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1998), or whether the failure to give notice was excused because the patient had an "emergency medical condition," as defined by Section 395.002(9)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1998), or the giving of notice was otherwise not practicable.The Final Order resolved that the claim was compensable, an award was made, and it was resolved that the hospital gave notice but the participation physicians did not give notice.
94-000907N  LUIS AND DORA ZEPEDA, O/B/O KARINA ZEPEDA vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 22, 1994
At issue in this proceeding is whether Karina Zepeda suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.Substantial injury as used in the statutory phrase ""permanently and substan- tially mentally and physicially impaired"" construed to mean catastrophic.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer