welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Steven T. Williams
Steven T. Williams
Steven T. Williams
Visitors: 69
0
Bar #740101(FL)     License for 21 years; Member in Good Standing
Key West FL

Are you Steven T. Williams? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 33 U.S.c 408, 42 U.S.C 2011

CFR: 14 CFR 77, 33 CFR 208, 33 CFR 385, 33 CFR 385.20, 33 CFR 385.20, 33 CFR 385.20, 33 CFR 385.26, 33 CFR 385.26, 33 CFR 385.26, 40 CFR 144.39, 40 CFR 144.39, 40 CFR 144.39, 40 CFR 144.40, 40 CFR 144.40, 40 CFR 144.40, 40 CFR 144.41

Florida Laws: 1.01, 10.15, 120.52, 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 120.69, 163.3164, 163.3167, 163.3177, 163.3184, 163.3187, 163.3194, 163.3209, 252.34, 253.02, 253.115, 258.397, 267.061, 286.0114, 334.03, 334.044, 335.182, 335.188, 337.401, 337.402, 337.403, 337.404, 361.01, 365.172, 366.03, 366.04, 366.93, 373.016, 373.044, 373.085, 373.086, 373.089, 373.103, 373.113, 373.1391, 373.1501, 373.1502, 373.223, 373.229, 373.308, 373.309, 373.316, 373.413, 373.4135, 373.4136, 373.414, 373.416, 373.429, 373.4592, 373.603, 376.301, 379.2291, 379.2431, 380.04, 380.05, 380.0552, 381.0065, 403.031, 403.061, 403.086, 403.501, 403.502, 403.503, 403.504, 403.5064, 403.5065, 403.50665, 403.507, 403.508, 403.509, 403.510, 403.511, 403.5113, 403.5115, 403.514, 403.516, 403.519, 403.522, 403.526, 403.5271, 403.531, 403.5317, 48.20, 48.21, 7.01, 7.02, 713.01, 872.02, 95.11

Florida Administrative Code: 18-18.004, 18-18.006, 18-21.003, 25-6.0342, 25-6.0345, 28-106.217, 40E-2.091, 40E-20.302, 40E-3.101, 40E-4.091, 40E-4.302, 40E-6.011, 40E-6.041, 40E-6.221, 40E-6.311, 40E-6.351, 62-110.106, 62-17.133, 62-17.191, 62-17.211, 62-17.281, 62-17.660, 62-345.100, 62-345.400, 62-345.500, 62-345.900, 62-555.310, 62-672.870, 68A-16.001, 68A-16.002

4D09-1435  Graham v. State  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 24, 2010 Citations: 29 So. 3d 307
29 So. 3d 307 (2010) GRAHAM v. STATE. No. 4D09-1435. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 24, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.
18-005255  DALK LAND, LP. vs MONROE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2018
The issues to be decided are whether the County's Building Official erred in (i) approving an elevation certificate on the authority of his conclusion that the building permit issued many years earlier entitles Intervenors to a favorable interpretation of the relevant flood zone boundary on their oceanfront property, which is adjacent to Petitioner's property; and (ii) lifting a stop-work order based upon the approval of the elevation certificate.Building Official erred in approving an elevation certificate on the grounds that the building permit issued years earlier entitles the landowner to a favorable interpretation of the flood zone boundary on its property, and in lifting a stop-work order.
2D07-4977  Young v. City of Dunedin  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 05, 2008 Citations: 974 So. 2d 1075
974 So. 2d 1075 (2008) YOUNG v. CITY OF DUNEDIN. No. 2D07-4977. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 5, 2008. Decision without published opinion. App.dismissed.
16-001345GM  GREG DANIELS AND MICHAEL BELLOWS vs MONROE COUNTY  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 10, 2016
Whether Amendment 15-1ACSC to the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan, adopted by Ordinances 003-2016 and 004-2016 on February 10, 2016, is “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2015).1/Petitioners failed to prove beyond fair debate that the plan amendment was either internally inconsistent with the comprehensive plan, or inconsistent with the principles for guiding development.
16-001349GM  MICHAEL BELLOWS vs MONROE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2016
Whether Amendment 15-1ACSC to the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan, adopted by Ordinances 003-2016 and 004-2016 on February 10, 2016, is “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2015).1/Petitioners failed to prove beyond fair debate that the plan amendment was either internally inconsistent with the comprehensive plan, or inconsistent with the principles for guiding development.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer