Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
T. Kent Wetherell
T. Kent Wetherell
Visitors: 27
0
Bar #60208(FL)    
Tallahassee FL

Are you T. Kent Wetherell? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

97-000870RP  CONSOLIDATED-TOMOKA LAND COMPANY; INDIGO DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.; ET AL. vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 21, 1997
The issue in these cases is whether proposed amendments to Rules 40C-4.041, 40C-4.051, 40C-4.091, 40C-41.011, 40C-41.023, 40C-41.033, 40C-41.043, 40C-41.051, and 40C-41.063, and the related revisions to the Applicant’s Handbook: Management and Storage of Surface Waters are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as alleged by petitioners.There was no statute detailing particular powers and duties to support rulemaking. Rules declared invalid; rules valid as to other grounds raised.
97-004370BID  241 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 18, 1997
Is the Department of Juvenile Justice's (DJJ's) intended award of the lease-purchase contract pursuant to RFP-P6P02 to The Haskell Company (Haskell) instead of to 241 Development Corporation (241 or 241 Development) contrary to the Agency's governing statutes, rules or policies, or the proposal specifications? See Section 120.57(3)(f), Florida Statutes, (Supp. 1996).BID responsiveness issues discussed as raised against Petitioner on "standing," as against Intervenor on protest, and as de novo.
96-001123F  DOUGLAS REYMORE vs DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 1996
The issues presented are whether Petitioner is entitled to an award of (1) the reasonable attorney's fees and costs he incurred in DOAH Case No. 95-3137BID pursuant to the Florida Equal Access to Justice Act and (2) his attorney's fees and costs incurred in this proceeding pursuant to Section 120.569(2)(c) [formerly 120.57(1)(b)5], Florida Statutes.Successful bid protestor entitled to fees for that proceeding and additional fees due to Department filing pleadings for improper purposes herein.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer