Palm Beach FL Administrative law, Environmental Law and Gove -- eLawyers

Tara Widholm Duhy

Visitors: 38

561-640-0820

Bar #796891(FL) License for 21 years; Member in Good Standing

West Palm Beach FL

Are you Tara Widholm Duhy? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

14-005657GM ALERTS OF PBC, INC., PATRICIA D. CURRY, ROBERT SCHUTZER, AND KAREN SCHUTZER vs PALM BEACH COUNTY (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 26, 2014

The issue to be determined in this case is whether the amendments to the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan (“the Comp Plan”) adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Palm Beach County by Ordinance No. 14-030 (“Proposed Amendments”) are “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2014).Palm Beach County's determination that the proposed amendments to its comprehensive plan are in compliance is fairly debatable.

14-001441GM THE SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA vs HENDRY COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 27, 2014

Whether the amendments to the Hendry County Comprehensive Plan adopted on February 25, 2014, by County Ordinance No. 2014- 03, are “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2013).1/Petitioner proved beyond fair debate that the Plan Amendment was not "in compliance," as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.

13-000515 GARY PIRTLE vs ROY D. VOSS AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2013

The issues to be determined are whether Respondent Roy Voss is entitled to an exemption from the requirement to obtain an Environmental Resource Permit (“ERP”) and entitled to “consent by rule” to use sovereignty submerged lands to install five mooring pilings next to his existing dock in Stuart, Florida.The Respondent's installation of mooring pilings did not qualify for an exemption under section 373.406(6), Florida Statutes, or consent by rule under Florida Administrative Code Rule 18-21.005(1)(b), because the pilings created a navigational hazard.

11-001206GM BARBARA GRAVES vs CITY OF POMPANO BEACH (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2011

The issue is whether the plan amendments adopted by the City of Pompano Beach (City) by Ordinance Nos. 2011-24 and 2011- 25 on February 8, 2011, are in compliance.Text and map amendments adopted by City were supported by data and analysis, and were internally consistent with other Plan provisions and statutory requirements.

10-000913GM MARTIN COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, INC., A FLORIDA NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORP.; DONNA MELZER AND ELIZA ACKERLY, INDIVIDUALS AND GROVE HOLDINGS, LLC; GROVES 12, LLC; AND GROVES 14 LLC, vs |MARTIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 22, 2010

The issues to be determined in this case are whether the amendments to the Martin County Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP) adopted by Ordinance Nos. 843, 845 (as amended by Ordinance No. 847), 846, 847, 851, 853, and 854 are “in compliance” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.1/It is recommended that all but two of the plan amendments adopted by Martin County be determined "in compliance."

10-001142GM GROVES HOLDINGS, LLC, GROVES 12, LLC, AND GROVES 14, LLC vs MARTIN COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 08, 2010

It is recommended that all but two of the plan amendments adopted by Martin County be determined "in compliance."