welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Tari Anne Rossitto-Van Winkle
Tari Anne Rossitto-Van Winkle
Tari Anne Rossitto-Van Winkle
Visitors: 73
0
Bar #613908(FL)     License for 39 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Tari Anne Rossitto-Van Winkle? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 18 U. S. C. 2252, 18 U. S. C. 2252A, 18 U. S. C. 2256, 18 U.S.C 2252

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 120.60, 120.68, 20.43, 322.03, 322.34, 322.35, 456.057, 456.063, 456.072, 456.077, 458.331, 460.413, 466.001, 466.003, 466.028, 480.046, 480.047, 480.0485, 784.03, 812.014, 817.234, 893.13, 90.301, 90.804, 943.04, 943.0435

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.216

10-001149PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs MARCUS E. MCCASTLER, L. M. T.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2010
The issues presented in this case are whether Respondent has violated the provisions of Chapters 456 and 480, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Chapters 64B7-26, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what penalty should be imposed?Petitioner proved that Respondent obtained his license by providing false information on his application regarding his criminal history, but did not prove sexual misconduct.
12-000005PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs GUSTAVO B. BORGES, D.D.S.  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 03, 2012
The issues in this case are whether Respondent's plea and adjudication of guilt to knowingly receiving child pornography, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, ยง 2252A(a)(2)(A), relates to Respondent's practice or ability to practice dentistry, violating section 466.028(1)(ll) by violating 456.072 (1)(c), Florida Statutes, and if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated section 466.028(1)(ll) by violating section 456.072(1)(c).
10-002796PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE vs MIA A. HIGGINBOTHAM, D.C.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 21, 2010
The issues in this case are whether Respondent was convicted or found guilty of a crime which directly relates to the practice of chiropractic medicine; and, if so, whether Petitioner should impose discipline on Respondent's chiropractic license within the applicable penalty guidelines or take some other action.Respondent established reasonable grounds, consistent with innocence, for pleading nolo contendere to criminal fraud charges for which she was not adjudicated guilty; thus Respondent was not convicted or found guilty of a crime.
11-002594PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE vs WENDY S. COREN, D.C.  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 23, 2011

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer