welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Terry Cole
Terry Cole
Terry Cole
Visitors: 119
0
Bar #133550(FL)     License for 54 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Terry Cole? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 33 U.S.C 1251, 33 U.S.C 1313, 33 U.S.C 1342, 40 U.S.C 7479, 42 U.S.C 1395w, 5 U.S.C 558

CFR: 40 CFR 122.41, 40 CFR 130, 40 CFR 130.7, 40 CFR 130.7, 40 CFR 130.7, 40 CFR 130.7, 40 CFR 130.7, 40 CFR 130.7, 40 CFR 131, 40 CFR 131.11, 40 CFR 131.11, 40 CFR 131.11, 40 CFR 50.2, 40 CFR 50.2, 40 CFR 50.2, 42 CFR 422, 42 CFR 422.350, 42 CFR 422.350, 42 CFR 422.350, 42 CFR 422.352, 42 CFR 422.354

Florida Laws: 119.07, 119.15, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.541, 120.542, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 163.3164, 163.3167, 20.255, 216.311, 253.03, 258.004, 258.007, 373.309, 373.414, 373.4145, 373.4592, 376.30702, 377.21, 377.22, 377.371, 377.601, 380.04, 403.021, 403.031, 403.051, 403.061, 403.062, 403.067, 403.086, 403.0872, 403.088, 403.0885, 403.201, 403.412, 403.501, 403.502, 403.503, 403.504, 403.5066, 403.50665, 403.507, 403.508, 403.509, 403.510, 403.511, 403.5115, 403.518, 403.5185, 403.519, 403.52, 403.521, 403.522, 403.526, 403.527, 403.5271, 403.529, 403.531, 403.5365, 403.537, 403.804, 403.805, 403.855, 403.861, 403.93345, 409.901, 409.912, 409.91211, 409.962, 409.966, 409.974, 456.053, 550.0251, 550.2415, 641.316, 83.61, 90.202, 934.02

Florida Administrative Code: 18-14.003, 18-21.004, 61D-6.002, 62-210.200, 62-302.200, 62-302.300, 62-302.500, 62-302.530, 62-302.531, 62-302.532, 62-302.700, 62-302.800, 62-303.150, 62-303.351, 62-303.353, 62-303.354, 62-303.500, 62-4.070, 62-4.242, 62-4.244, 62-660.300, 62D-2.014

01-001464RP  FLORIDA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP CITIZEN LOBBY, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2001
Whether proposed Rule Chapter 62-303, Florida Administrative Code, which describes how the Department of Environmental Protection will exercise its authority under Section 403.067, Florida Statutes, to identify and list those surface waters in the state that are impaired for purposes of the state's total maximum daily load (commonly referred to as "TMDL") program, is an "invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority," within the meaning of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, for the reasons asserted by Petitioners.Department`s "identification of impaired surface waters" rule is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
01-001465RP  SANTA ROSA SOUND COALITION vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2001
Whether proposed Rule Chapter 62-303, Florida Administrative Code, which describes how the Department of Environmental Protection will exercise its authority under Section 403.067, Florida Statutes, to identify and list those surface waters in the state that are impaired for purposes of the state's total maximum daily load (commonly referred to as "TMDL") program, is an "invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority," within the meaning of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, for the reasons asserted by Petitioners.Department`s "identification of impaired surface waters" rule is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
01-001466RP  FRIENDS OF SAINT SEBASTIAN RIVER vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2001
Whether proposed Rule Chapter 62-303, Florida Administrative Code, which describes how the Department of Environmental Protection will exercise its authority under Section 403.067, Florida Statutes, to identify and list those surface waters in the state that are impaired for purposes of the state's total maximum daily load (commonly referred to as "TMDL") program, is an "invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority," within the meaning of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, for the reasons asserted by Petitioners.Department`s "identification of impaired surface waters" rule is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
01-002442  PUTNAM COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, INC.; STEWARDS OF THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, INC., AND LINDA YOUNG vs GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 19, 2001
The issues are whether Georgia-Pacific Corporation is entitled to the issuance of an industrial wastewater facility permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program that would authorize it to discharge industrial wastewater to the St. Johns River in Putnam County, Florida, and whether Georgia-Pacific Corporation has met the statutory criteria for a related administrative order for the interim discharge to Rice Creek in Putnam County, Florida.Applicant satisfied all criteria for issuance of a wastewater permit and approval of related administrative order relating to discharge of wastewater in St. Johns River.
01-001490  JACQUELINE M. LANE vs INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 18, 2001
The first issue is whether Petitioner, Jacqueline M. Lane (Lane) has standing. The second issue is whether International Paper Company (IP) provided reasonable assurances it has the ability to meet the conditions of the existing industrial wastewater permit for the wastewater treatment facility at the paper mill in Cantonment, Florida, pursuant to Rule 62- 620.340(3), Florida Administrative Code. A final issue is whether Lane litigated this matter for an improper purpose.International Paper Company provided reasonable assurances of its ability to comply with existing industrial wastewater treatment facility permit and related documents which justified transfer of permit.
87-004921  JACQUELINE M. LANE vs. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 18, 1999
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether variances related to water quality standards found in Chapter 17-3, Florida Administrative Code should be issued to Champion International Corporation (Champion), as more particularly described in the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law herein. See Section 403.201(1)(a), Florida Statutes. In resolving those issues, it must be determined whether the phrase "there is no practicable means known or available for the adequate control of the pollution involved" means no "possible" means known or available, or no "reasonable" means known or available. Additionally, it must be determined whether a temporary operation permit (TOP) should be issued pursuant to Section 403.088(3), Florida Statutes and, as part of that consideration, whether all the criteria in that statutory section must be affirmatively demonstrated or whether some of them are alternative criteria. Also at issue is the question of whether a consent order should be entered incorporating the temporary operating permit and its conditions and the variances requested.Very complex scientific issues in environmental permitting and variance application ease temporary operators permit variance and consent order recommended to be approved with required studies
98-002210  HARLLEE PACKING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 14, 1998
The issue in this case is whether the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) should revoke the Petitioner's exemption from the requirement to obtain a General Permit for Disposal of Tomato Wash Water under Florida Administrative Code Rule 62-660.805.DEP revoked permit exemption issued by DER for tomato wash operation although operation used less than 5,000 gpd of wash-water. Evidence not clear why exemption issued. Under proper interpretation of rule, no permit should have been issued. RO: revoke.
97-000692  JOYCE (JOY) E. TOWLES CUMMINGS vs BUCKEYE FLORIDA, L.P., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 10, 1997
Whether Respondent Buckeye Florida L.P., (Buckeye), has provided reasonable assurances to Respondent Department of Environmental Protection (Department) that construction activity for the proposed project will comply with applicable provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, and related administrative rules.Petitions should be dismissed for lack of standing and lack of verified petitions.
96-000602  JOSEPH L. CUTTER vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 31, 1996
The issues are: (1) whether Petitioner Joseph L. Cutter has a substantial interest in Respondent Department of Environmental Protection's adoption of the 1995 report entitled "Delineation of Ground and Surface Water Areas Potentially Impacted by an Industrial Discharge to the Fenholloway River of Taylor County, Florida"; (2) whether Respondent Department of Environmental Protection properly identified the area along the Fenholloway River where river water containing an industrial discharge may potentially impact ground and surface water; and (3) whether Buckeye Florida, L.P. has standing to participate as an Intervenor in this proceeding.Petitioner did not prove that his substantial interests were affected by DEP's adoption of a report showing area impacted by contaminated river water.
88-002461  BAY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 05, 1989
Whether petitioner's application for extension of its temporary operating permit, No. 1003-107768, should be granted?Permit applicant's failure to appear requires denial of permit for failure to meet burden of proof.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer