welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Thomas Michael Hoeler
Thomas Michael Hoeler
Thomas Michael Hoeler
Visitors: 99
0
Bar #709311(FL)     License for 38 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Thomas Michael Hoeler? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

17-005769  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs REHABILITATION CENTER AT HOLLYWOOD HILLS, LLC  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 17, 2017
The issues to be determined in this case are whether Respondent, Rehabilitation Center at Hollywood Hills, LLC ("Hollywood Hills"), violated Florida law as alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint filed by the Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA" or "Agency"); and, if so, what sanctions should be imposed.AHCA demonstrated Hollywood Hills commited several Class 1 violations resulting in, or contributing to, the deaths of 9 patients and a mass casualty incident in the aftermath of a loss of A/C from Hurricane Irma. Recommend license revocation.
84-840  Strickland v. Strickland  (1984)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 28, 1984 Citations: 456 So. 2d 583
456 So. 2d 583 (1984) Richard Crosby STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. Barbara J. STRICKLAND, Appellee. No. 84-840. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. September 28, 1984. Thomas C. Chase of Allen, Knudsen, Swartz, DeBoest, Rhoads & Edwards, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellant. Geraldyne H. Carlton of Carlton & Carlton, P.A., Lakeland, for appellee. CAMPBELL, Judge. Appellant, Richard Crosby Strickland, appeals the partial summary judgment granted in favor of appellee, Barbara J. Strickland..
15-005655  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs GAINESVILLE WOMAN CARE, LLC, D/B/A BREAD AND ROSES WELL WOMAN CARE  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 09, 2015
At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent, Gainesville Woman Care, LLC, d/b/a Bread & Roses Well Woman Care (“Bread & Roses”), provided services in excess of the scope of its license by providing abortions to five patients beyond the first trimester of pregnancy, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint.Agency failed to prove that the clinic provided abortion services beyond the scope of its license.
15-005541  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs CAPRI HEALTHCARE, INC., D/B/A AASTRA WOMEN'S CENTER  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 01, 2015
08-000621  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs MARYDALE, INC., D/B/A MARYLAND MANOR  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 01, 2008
07-003474  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs PCM HEALTH CARE OF PINELLAS COUNTY, INC., D/B/A SHADY GLEN I  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2007
08-002903  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs ORLANDO LUTHERAN TOWERS, INC., D/B/A ORLANDO LUTHERAN TOWERS  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 17, 2008
07-003640  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs GUARDIAN CARE, INC., D/B/A GUARDIAN CARE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2007
07-001485  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., D/B/A MORTON PLANT NORTH BAY HOSPITAL  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 30, 2007
07-003470  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs GUARDIAN CARE, INC., D/B/A GUARDIAN CARE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2007

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer