welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Timothy E. Dennis
Timothy E. Dennis
Timothy E. Dennis
Visitors: 126
0
Bar #575410(FL)     License for 23 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Timothy E. Dennis? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.502, 45 CFR 164.514, 45 CFR 164.514, 45 CFR 164.514, 45 CFR 164.524, 45 CFR 164.524, 45 CFR 164.524, 45 CFR 502, 45 CFR 502, 45 CFR 502

Florida Laws: 1.01, 1.02, 119.07, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.60, 120.68, 120.80, 125.01, 125.0104, 161.053, 163.3164, 163.3167, 163.3174, 163.3177, 163.3178, 163.3180, 163.3181, 163.3184, 163.3187, 163.3191, 163.3245, 187.101, 187.201, 196.012, 196.199, 20.06, 20.21, 201.01, 201.02, 202.35, 211.13, 212.02, 212.03, 212.031, 212.05, 212.0515, 212.054, 212.055, 212.06, 212.07, 212.08, 212.096, 212.11, 212.12, 212.14, 212.15, 212.17, 212.18, 213.05, 213.053, 213.06, 213.21, 213.23, 213.34, 213.345, 213.67, 213.69, 213.692, 213.755, 215.26, 215.75, 220.181, 220.23, 243.77, 288.703, 290.004, 290.0065, 310.151, 314.07, 335.065, 380.05, 380.0552, 381.028, 395.3025, 408.051, 455.227, 456.001, 456.076, 468.4315, 468.433, 468.436, 468.603, 468.606, 468.607, 468.609, 501.122, 553.72, 553.73, 553.88, 553.898, 561.29, 57.105, 609.01, 624.50921, 7.06, 7.21, 72.011, 765.401, 766.104, 8.02, 944.09, 945.10, 945.25, 95.091

Florida Administrative Code: 12-24.003, 12A-1.044, 33-401.701, 61G19-6.0035, 61G19-6.016, 9J-5.003, 9J-5.005, 9J-5.0055, 9J-5.006

02-003898GM  BECKY AYECH vs SARASOTA COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 03, 2002
The issue is whether a Sarasota County plan amendment adopted by Ordinance No. 2001-76 on July 10, 2002, is in compliance.Numerous changes to the text of the County Comprehensive Plan were all fairly debatable and thus in compliance.
03-004415GM  GREGORY L. STRAND vs DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND ESCAMBIA COUNTY  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 25, 2003
The issue is whether the plan amendment adopted by Ordinance No. 2003-45 on September 4, 2003, is in compliance.Plan amendment changing the land use on parcel from residential to commercial is fairly debatable and therefore in compliance.
03-000718GM  ANNA R. CURRENT vs TOWN OF JUPITER AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 28, 2003
The issue in this case is whether Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2002-02, adopted by the Town of Jupiter (Town) as Ordinance 62-02, is "in compliance" as defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.1Challenge to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment primarily on the ground that the Town did not follow its adoption procedures, but that it is not a compliance review criterion challenge fails, as the Amendment is "in compliance."

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer