The issue in this case is whether Petitioner's application for a license to engage in the business of contracting should be granted or denied.Respondent denied Petitioner`s contract application on the ground that a prior felony conviction disqualified him. However, Petitioner has established sufficient proof of rehabilitation. Recommend that his application for licensure be approved.
The issue is whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 62B- 33.005(3)(a) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority for the reasons alleged by Petitioners.Florida Administrative Code Rule 62B-33.005(3)(a), which governs the cumulative impact analysis under the coastal construction control line permitting program, is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
The issue is whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 62B- 33.005(3)(a) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority for the reasons alleged by Petitioners.Florida Administrative Code Rule 62B-33.005(3)(a), which governs the cumulative impact analysis under the coastal construction control line permitting program, is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
This is a rule challenge proceeding in which the following specific issues are presented: Whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 61G4-12.006 is an invalid delegation of legislative authority, and Whether application of the provisions of Section 112.011(1)(b), Florida Statutes, by the Construction Industry Licensing Board in its quasi-judicial capacity constitutes an agency statement of general applicability that requires rulemaking by the agency.An adopted rule repealed by the legislative action cannot be challenged under Section 120.56, Florida Statutes. A related agency statement was not a rule.
The issues are whether the existing and proposed provisions of Florida Administrative Code Rule 61G4-15.005, as identified in the next paragraph, are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.Petitioner had standing to challenge net-worth rule as applicable to trades for which Petitioner offered pre-licensing courses. Petitioner proved existing and prior net-worth rules for these trades modified, enlarged, and contravened the law implemented.
Whether the Petitions for Formal Administrative Proceeding should be dismissed.Clerical error does not afford party status or point of entry to challenge year-old notice of intent to issue permit.
The issue is whether Petitioners' Motions for Attorney's Fees should be granted, and if so, in what amount.Attorney`s fees awarded on a per party basis, not per case basis; challenger need not participate in an appeal in order to collect fees incurred at the administrative level.
The issue is whether Petitioners' Motions for Attorney's Fees should be granted, and if so, in what amount.Attorney`s fees awarded on a per party basis, not per case basis; challenger need not participate in an appeal in order to collect fees incurred at the administrative level.
The issue in these cases is whether certain proposed amendments to Rule 18-21.019(1), Florida Administrative Code, are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority, as alleged by Petitioners.Agency met burden of proving that proposed rules were a valid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
