Leon FL Lawyers | Vernon L Whittier Jr. -- eLawyers

89-000830 KASPER CORP. vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 24, 1990

Whether Kasper Corporation should be recertified as a disadvantaged business enterprise pursuant to Chapter 14-78, Florida Administrative Code.Whether respondent is eligiable for re-certification as a disadvantaged business enterprise.

89-001714 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. FUQUA AND DAVIS, INC. (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 20, 1989

Whether the respondents or some of them erected and maintained outdoor advertising signs in violation of Rule 14-10.006(1)(a), Florida Administrative Code, because more than two advertisements or "messages" were visible to motorists at the same location?DOT cannot regulate outdoor advertising signs on the basis of how many different messages a single billboard or ""sign face"" is thought to convey.

89-001227 GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 02, 1989

Whether the functional classification of State Road 78 situated in Glades County, was properly reclassified in the functional evaluation which took place prior to the January 25, 1989, and resulted in the notice of jurisdictional transfer of the road from the state to the county. Whether the road for which responsibility is being transferred was brought to a physical condition commensurate with contemporary roads of like age and existing functional classification within Glades County.Agency's determination that a change in road function made it a road to be maintained by county instead of state was incorrect.

88-004932 ALBERT F. COOPER vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1988)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 19, 1989

Does Petitioner's proposed seaplane base site meet the requirements for a site approval as provided in Section 330.30, F.S. and Section 14-60.005-.007, F.A.C.?Seaplane base application denied where zoning variance not currently available

88-006208 LAKE LUCERNE CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC.; CRESTVIEW HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; AND ROLLING OAKS HOMEOWNERS vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1988)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 29, 1989

The issue is whether the application for airport site approval made by Robbie Stadium Corporation satisfies the requirements of Section 330.30(1)(a), Florida Statutes and Chapter 14-60.007(6), Florida Administrative Code.Homeowner association opposition to DOT permit for helistop at Joe Robbie stadium dismissed for failure to specify safety violations and res judicata

89-002697 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. THOMAS PROMISES FARMS (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 07, 1989

Whether Respondent's sign violates Florida Law as alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what further action is required.Posted written notice from DOT requiring removal of sign was misleading and contrary to controlling law.

89-000790 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. RIVERSIDE VILLAGE MARINA (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 26, 1989

Whether Respondent's facility is eligible to display a "camping" logo at Exit 64A on 1-75 at the intersection with SR 674.Failure to meet shower, toilet facilities and potable water requirements grounds for revocation of camping logo sign eligibility.

89-001898 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. DOLPHIN OUTDOOR ADVERTISING (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 05, 1989

Whether the application contains knowingly false or misleading information; or Whether the Department is estopped to revoke the permits.Mistake of law not ground for equitable estoppel against state (note: DCA reversed.)

88-004047 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY (1988)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 25, 1989

Whether DOT is authorized to revoke sign permits, because the signs are within 100 feet of a state park boundary (but more than 100 feet from the point at which the park boundary intersects the state road right-of-way), where DOT conducted a field inspection before granting the permit applications, which disclosed the general proximity of a park?Sign within 100 ft of park must come down although DOT issued permit. Statute forbids such placement. No reliance on factual representations by DOT

89-000773 CATHERINE S. GRAY vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 22, 1989

Abandonment of employment failure to appear at hearing case dismissed.

Vernon L Whittier Jr.