welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Virginia Alice Daire
Virginia Alice Daire
Virginia Alice Daire
Visitors: 34
0
Bar #263389(FL)     License for 46 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Virginia Alice Daire? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

60677  Reedy Creek Utilities Co. v. FLA. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N  (1982)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 29, 1982 Citations: 418 So. 2d 249
418 So. 2d 249 (1982) REEDY CREEK UTILITIES CO., Appellant, v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Appellee. No. 60677. Supreme Court of Florida. July 29, 1982. *250 Lee G. Schmudde, Lake Buena Vista, for appellant. William S. Bilenky, Gen. Counsel and Virginia Alice Daire, Associate Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee. EHRLICH, Justice. This cause is before us on direct appeal brought by Reedy Creek Utilities Co. to review Orders No. 9456-A and No. 9998 of the Public Service Commission. We ha..
94-004675  MARTA AMADO-MAGNORSKY vs BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINERS  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 24, 1994
The issue presented is whether Petitioner qualifies for licensure as a psychologist in Florida, either by endorsement or by examination.Denial of licensure as a psychologist, by examination or endorsement, for failure to prove petitioner had required educational qualifications.
93-001476RP  SHERMAN COLLEGE OF STRAIGHT CHIROPRACTIC vs BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 11, 1993
The above consolidated cases are challenges to existing rule 21D- 11.001(2)(c), F.A.C. and proposed rule 21D-17.0045(1). Both reflect the policy of the Board of Chiropractic (Board) that candidates for licensure examination or for a training program must have graduated from a chiropractic college with regional and professional accreditation recognized by the U.S. Department of Education (USDOE) and the Council on Postsecondary Accreditation (COPA). The petitioners/intervenor assert that the dual accreditation requirement is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Respondent contends that the rules are valid and that the challengers lack standing to bring this action.Rule amends. that require 2 types of accreditation when statute does not are invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority college has standing to challenge.
94-000583RU  GARY A. BURDEN vs BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 02, 1994
Eleven separate petitions were filed pursuant to section 120.535, F.S. alleging various non-rule policies of the Board of Professional Land Surveyors and requesting that those alleged policies be adopted by rule. The threshold issue in these cases is whether such policies exist; if so, it must be determined whether they are rules, as defined in section 120.52(16), and whether rulemaking is feasible and practicable, as provided in section 120.535(1), F.S.Petitioner failed to prove ""policies"" of Board and failed to prove various rules were arbitrary or illegal. No bad faith by either party. No fees.
89-005268  KENNETH S. GORDON vs BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINERS  (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 1989
This issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the doctoral program in psychology at the Fielding Institute, headquartered in Santa Barbara, California met the requirement of Rule 21U-11.006(1)(b)5., 7., 9., and 10B., Florida Administrative Code during the period 1981 through 1986 when the Petitioner was enrolled in and completed that program and consequently whether the Petitioner meets the standards for application for licensure by examination as a graduate of that program.Psychiatrist Doctoral Program not shown to be comparable to accredited program because no proof that program met on campus residency rule/ no continuous access to faculty.
84-003498  ANGELA PORTERA vs. JAX LIQUORS, INC.  (1984)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 12, 1985
Lounge manager's gender discrimination charge should be dismissed for lack of prima facie evidence; employer had legitimate reasons for termination.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer