Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Mr. William Dean Hall III
Mr. William Dean Hall III
Visitors: 53
0
Bar #67936(FL)     License for 16 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Mr. William Dean Hall III? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

17-004873PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs ARECI ROBLEDO  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 2017
Whether Respondent raced animals that were impermissibly medicated or determined to have prohibited substances present, resulting in a positive test for such medications or substances in violation of section 550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2016),1/ as alleged in the administrative complaints; and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent committed seven violations of section 550.2415 by impermissibly medicating or administering prohibited substances to racing greyhounds. Recommend fine and license supension.
17-001533PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs ROBERT G. DAWSON  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 13, 2017
Whether Respondent raced an animal that was impermissibly medicated or determined to have a prohibited substance present, in violation of section 550.2415(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2016),1/ as alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what sanction is appropriate.Petitioner proved 18 counts of racing a greyhound with a drug. Separate counts for drugs that were possibly metabolites of primary drug constituted a mitigating factor.
16-001009  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs JACKSONVILLE KENNEL CLUB, INC.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 19, 2016
Whether Jacksonville Kennel Club violated section 849.086(12)(a), Florida Statutes (2015), by conducting unauthorized card games in its cardroom, and section 849.086(6)(c), by allowing unlicensed persons to work in its cardroom; and, if so, whether the Division should be estopped from prosecuting Jacksonville Kennel Club. Also at issue is whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaint constitute an unadopted rule in violation of section 120.57(1)(e)1., Florida Statutes.Peitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent operated specified card games in violation of s. 849.086(12), but failed to prove that it allowed persons to work without valid occupational licenses in violation of s. 849.086(6).
21-001789RU  POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 04, 2021
At issue is whether Petitioner has met the pleading requirements in section 120.56(4), Florida Statutes (2020),1 to allege "agency statements" that meet the definition of a "rule."Pet.’s challenge to problems with new EVV system are not to “agency statements”--to AHCA’s positions intended to apply as law. Instead, Pet. alleged AHCA believes past system problems are fixed.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer