Hillsborough FL Estate planning and Personal injury Lawyers -- eLawyers

18-0510 ANGEL ZAYAS CHICO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 20, 2019

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ANGEL ZAYAS CHICO, ) DOC #Y63895, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-510 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 20, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; George Richards, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney Gener..

19-0617 Donnie Ray Joyner v. State of Florida (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 2019

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D19-0617 _ DONNIE RAY JOYNER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _ Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction. October 14, 2019 PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits. MAKAR, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _ Donnie Ray Joyner, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahas..

4083 Quinnelly v. Southern Maid Syrup Company (1964)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 15, 1964 Citations: 164 So. 2d 240

164 So. 2d 240 (1964) Robert T. QUINNELLY, Appellant, v. SOUTHERN MAID SYRUP COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellee. No. 4083. District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District. April 15, 1964. Rehearing Denied June 3, 1964. *241 Miller, Cone, Owen, Wagner & Nugent, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, Miami, for appellee. McDONALD, PARKER LEE, Associate Judge. This is an appeal from a final judgment in favor of the Defendant, Southern Maid Syrup Comp..

99-000306 BOARD OF MEDICINE vs HOWARD BRUCE RUBIN, M.D. (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 25, 1999

The issue is whether Respondent failed to practice medicine at the level of care, skill, and treatment that is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances and, if not, the penalty.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent deviated from the applicable standard of care by placing a tube in a kidney for drainage.

00-001535 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs MARTHA N. M. PILAPIL, M.D. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 10, 2000

The issue for consideration in this case is whether Respondent's license as a physician in Florida should be disciplined because of the matters alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed herein.Evidence was insufficient to prove practice below standards, but was sufficient to show failure to keep proper records.

01-003164PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs RONALD A. FORD, M.D. (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 13, 2001

Whether Respondent violated Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Doctor failed to come to hospital to examine patient admitted from emergency room with small bowel obstruction and failed to call for a surgical consult. Probation, fine, and continuing education recommended.

00-001025 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ALAN T. BRAUNSTEIN, M.D. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 07, 2000

The issue for consideration in this hearing is whether Respondent's license as a physician in Florida should be disciplined because of the matters alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed herein.Extended period of watchful waiting after continued high Protein Specific Antigen levels without referral to urologist or other diagnostic measures constitutes practice of medicine below standards of care, skill, and treatment.

99-001826 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF OPTOMETRY vs JAY B. KLEIN, O.D. (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 1999

The issue is whether Respondent is guilty of violating the applicable standard of care in the practice of optometry, the prohibition against filing reports or records known to be false, or the prohibition against fraud, deceit, misconduct, or negligence in the practice of optometry.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent`s failure to diagnose glaucoma deviated from applicable standard of care.

97-002349 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH vs THOMAS D. HOARD (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 15, 1997

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint. If so, what punitive action should be taken against him.Record evidence did not sustain charge that urologist misdiagnosed patient as having lesions in her bladder.

William Barrett Taylor IV