welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. William Henry Stafford III
William Henry Stafford III
William Henry Stafford III
Visitors: 468
0
Bar #70394(FL)     License for 30 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you William Henry Stafford III? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

SC15-774  Dan Sowell, etc. v. Panama Commons L.P.  (2016)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 02, 2016
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC15-774 _ DAN SOWELL, et al., Appellants, vs. PANAMA COMMONS L.P., Appellee. [June 2, 2016] POLSTON, J. In Stranburg v. Panama Commons L.P., 160 So. 3d 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), the First District Court of Appeal held that Panama Commons’ right to due process was violated by applying the 2013 repeal of the ad valorem tax exemption under section 196.1978, Florida Statutes (2012), to the 2013 tax year.1 However, because Panama Commons’ interest in the tax exemption un..
15-006108RU  FLORIDA BEE DISTRIBUTION, INC., D/B/A TOBACCO EXPRESS DISTRIBUTORS vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 28, 2015
The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco (the “Department”), is operating under an unadopted rule in its application of sections 210.276 and 210.30, Florida Statutes, which impose a surcharge and an excise tax, respectively, on tobacco products other than cigarettes or cigars, commonly known as other tobacco products (“OTP”), by calculating “wholesale sales price” as the full invoice price charged by OTP manufacturers to distributors, including any federal excise taxes (“FET”) and shipping charges reflected in the invoice price.The Department's statement of general applicability must be adopted as a rule. Petitioners are entitled to fees.
15-006148RU  PLANET TRADING, INC., AND MELBOURNE, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 30, 2015
The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco (the “Department”), is operating under an unadopted rule in its application of sections 210.276 and 210.30, Florida Statutes, which impose a surcharge and an excise tax, respectively, on tobacco products other than cigarettes or cigars, commonly known as other tobacco products (“OTP”), by calculating “wholesale sales price” as the full invoice price charged by OTP manufacturers to distributors, including any federal excise taxes (“FET”) and shipping charges reflected in the invoice price.The Department's statement of general applicability must be adopted as a rule. Petitioners are entitled to fees.
13-004280PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs PETER CHOY, M.D.  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 05, 2013
The issues in this case are whether Respondent: (1) made deceptive, untrue, or fraudulent representations in or related to the practice of medicine; (2) failed to keep appropriate medical records with respect to Patient T.G.; (3) fell below the minimum acceptable standard of care in his treatment of T.G.; (4) misrepresented or concealed a material fact during the course of the disciplinary process; and/or (5) improperly interfered with Petitioner's investigation. If so, it will be necessary to determine whether Petitioner should impose discipline on Respondent's medical license within the applicable penalty guidelines, or take some other action.Respondent altered a patient's medical records to bolster his legal position when threatened with a lawsuit, a fact which he concealed from Petitioner, giving rise to the inference that he committed malpractice.
13-000411PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs TAMARA LIOR, M.D.  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 24, 2013
Whether Respondent performed a wrong-site procedure in violation of section 456.072(1)(bb), Florida Statutes; if so, whether (and what) disciplinary measures should be taken against Respondent's license to practice medicine.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent performed a wrong-site procedure in violation of section 456.072(1)(bb), Florida Statutes.
12-004150PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN EMON ANTHOUSIS, M.D.  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 27, 2012
12-004151PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN EMON ANTHOUSIS, M.D.  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 27, 2012
14-001851PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs SANDRA ANN LINDSTROM, P.A.  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 18, 2014
16-005555PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs VICENTE JUAN CHAVEZ, P.A.  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 22, 2016
12-004152PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN EMON ANTHOUSIS, M.D.  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 27, 2012

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer