Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MARC BROXMEYER, GERALD SCHEFFLAN, ET AL. vs. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 75-001219 (1975)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 75-001219 Visitors: 58
Judges: DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND
Agency: Department of Revenue
Latest Update: May 19, 1977
Summary: Whether documentary stamps and surtaxes are due on a Quit-Claim Deed dated March 3, 1975, from Bayshore 21, Inc., to Petitioners.Mortgages for quitclaim makes documentary stamp tax due on property transfer.
75-1219.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


MARC BROXMEYER, GERALD SCHEFFLAN ) and PEARL SCHEFFLAN, YETTA YOUNG, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 75-1219

)

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE )

OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice a hearing was held in this cause at Room 104, Collins Building, Tallahassee, Florida, at 2:00 P.M. on January 28, 1977 before Delphene

  1. Strickland, Hearing Officer, Division of Administrative Hearings, Department of Administration.


    APPEARANCES


    For Petitioners: Eugene J. Howard, Esquire

    2212 Biscayne Boulevard

    Miami, Florida 33137


    For Respondent: Harold F. X. Purnell, Esquire

    Assistant Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol

    Tallahassee, Florida 32304 ISSUE

    Whether documentary stamps and surtaxes are due on a Quit-Claim Deed dated March 3, 1975, from Bayshore 21, Inc., to Petitioners.


    INTRODUCTION


    Petitioners contend: that there are no documentary stamp tax due on the subject Quit-Claim Deed inasmuch as said deed was a deed of correction to correct certain "typographical errors;" that the corporation Bayshore 21, Inc., was used as a conduit to correct errors and comply with a court order and not pursuant to sale; that there were no corporate debts and the transfer to the Petitioners was made solely for the cancellation and retirement of its capital stock; that there was nothing of value given to the corporation in exchange for the property transfer.


    Respondent contends: that the Quit-Claim Deed was the deed that actually transferred title from Bayshore 21, Inc., and the purchaser, the Petitioners, took title subject to three mortgages which were the consideration for the

    conveyance, and therefore documentary and surtaxes are due on the Quit-Claim Deed.


    FINDINGS OF FACT


    1. A Quit-Claim Deed was executed the 3rd day of March, 1975, by Bayshore 21, Inc., first party to Marc Broxmeyer an undivided 70 percent interest; Gerald Schefflan and Pearl Schefflan, his wife, an undivided 20 percent interest; and Yetta Young an undivided 10 percent interest. The deed was recorded in Official Records Book of Dade County, Florida. The deed reflects that no documentary stamp taxes were affixed to the deed.


    2. At the time of the conveyance there existed upon the property three outstanding mortgages: one in the amount of One Million Four Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,450,000) in favor of Washington Federal Savings and Loan; one in the amount of One Million Eight Hundred Eighty Thousand One Hundred Six Dollars ($1,880,106) in favor of Sidney Salomon, et al.; and Twelve Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($12,500) in favor of Harold Kravitz. The total consideration for the conveyance amounted to Three Million Three Hundred Forty- Two Thousand Six Hundred Six Dollars ($3,342,606).


    3. The undisputed facts of the transaction as outlined at the hearing and agreed to by the Petitioners' attorney are as follows:


    4. Prior to August 17, 1974, all the outstanding stock of a corporation known as Tepmon of Florida, Inc., (Marvin Glick, presidents and controlling person and Eugene J. Howard, secretary) was held by Sidney Salomon, Jr., Hid Salomon, III, Elliot Stein, the Estate of Preston Estep and John Soult. On or about April 17, 1974, these people entered into an agreement for purchase and sale of corporate stock with Bayshore 21, Inc., pursuant to which Bayshore 21, Inc., agreed to purchase for Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000) all of the outstanding capital stock of Tepmon of Florida, Inc. At the time, Tepmon of Florida, Inc., had as its only asset a certain parcel of real property known as the Golden Strand Hotel, as shown by suit, Shoprite Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Tepmon, Inc., et al. in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, Case No. 74-29983.


    5. Pursuant to the purchase and sale agreement, a closing was to be held in various stages on August 19 and 20, 1974, at which time Sidney Salomon, et al., delivered to Bayshore 21, Inc., all of the capital stock of Tepmon of Florida, Inc. Bayshore 21, Inc., in turn executed and delivered at the closing a chattel mortgage in the amount of One Million Eight Hundred Eighty Thousand One Hundred Six Dollars ($1,880,106), the security for which there was sixty-nine

      (69) shares of capital stock of Tepmon of Florida, Inc., which stock represented the outstanding stock of Tepmon of Florida, Inc., and carried with it the ownership and control of said corporation. Also given to Sidney Salomon, et al, by Bayshore 21, Inc., at the closing was a purchase money mortgage in the amount of One Million Eight Hundred Eighty Thousand One Hundred Six Dollars ($1,880,106), which mortgage secured the real property known as the Golden Strand Hotel.


    6. The reason for the two separate security devices, one the chattel mortgage secured by the outstanding sixty-nine (69) shares of Tepmon of Florida, Inc., stock and the other the real property mortgage secured by the Golden Strand Hotel, was that the parties contemplated that upon Bayshore 21's acquisition of the outstanding Page 3 of 7' pages capital stock of Tepmon of Florida, Inc., Tepmon would be dissolved and completely liquidated. Mindful

      that such liquidation would render valueless as collateral the capital stock of Tepmon, the parties provided in a collateral security agreement, dated August 20, 1974, that the purchase money real estate mortgage would constitute the substitute collateral security for repayment of the outstanding purchase money obligation owed by Bayshore 21, Inc., to Sid Salomon, et al., effective upon the dissolution of Tepmon of Florida, Inc.


    7. Subsequent to acquiring all the capital stock of Tepmon of Florida, Inc., Bayshore 21, Inc., did in fact effectuate a complete dissolution and liquidation of Tepmon of Florida, Inc. Pursuant to such dissolution, the sole asset of Tepmon of Florida, Inc, the Golden Strand Hotel, should have become titled in the name of Tepmon of Florida, Inc.'s sole stockholder, Bayshore 21, Inc., in order to give effect to the validity of the purchase money mortgage. This is not what occurred however, as Sidney Salomon, et al., point out in their Cross-Claim to the aforementioned suit, the truthfulness of which assertions have been admitted by the Petitioners.


    8. The September 5, 1974 deed of conveyance of the Golden Strand Hotel from Tepmon of Florida, Inc., to Petitioners (which should have been to Bayshore 21, Inc.) contained only minimum stamps in the amount of eighty-five cents (85).


    9. As a result of the Cross-Claim in the aforementioned suit filed by Sidney Salomon, et al., against Petitioners, a stipulation and agreement was entered into resolving the matter in a manner which gave effect to the purchase money real estate mortgage given by Bayshore 21, Inc., to the Salomons. Pursuant to such stipulation, the Petitioners agreed that "the allegations made in the Cross Claim . . . are true and correct and Cross Claimants are entitled to the relief prayed for therein. Cross Defendants [Petitioners] have no defenses thereto, legal or equitable, or any kind whatsoever Pursuant to this stipulation, the Petitioners agreed to execute Quit-Claim Deeds conveying any interest they may have received in the property pursuant to the September 5, 1974 deed of conveyance from Tepmon of Florida, Inc., to Bayshore 21, Inc., the

      entity which was the sole stockholder of Tepmon of Florida, Inc., at the time of its dissolution and liquidation.


    10. By Quit-Claim Deeds dated January 2, 1975, Gerald and Pearl Schefflan conveyed their interest to Bayshore 21, Inc., Yetta Young conveyed her interest back to Bayshore 21, Inc., Marc Broxmeyer conveyed his interest back to Bayshore 21, Inc., and the last Board of Directors of Tepmon of Florida, Inc., comprised of Marvin Glick and Eugene Howard, also conveyed any interest that entity may have retained back to Bayshore 21, Inc.


    11. At this point Bayshore 21, Inc., finally held the title it was supposed to have acquired upon the dissolution and liquidation of Tepmon of Florida, Inc. Also at this point the validity of the purchase money real estate mortgage given by Bayshore 21, Inc., to Sidney Salomon, et al., was reestablished and the parties were returned to the posture called for and required by their purchase and sale agreement dated April 17, 1974.


    12. When, on March 3, 1975, Bayshore 21, Inc., conveyed title to the Golden Strand Hotel to the Petitioners in this action, by unstamped deed, the conveyance was a voluntary conveyance. At the time of the conveyance, three outstanding mortgages encumbered the real property. Such mortgages were a One Million Four Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollar ($1,450,000) mortgage in favor of Washington Federal Savings and Loan; the One Million Eight Hundred Eighty Thousand One Hundred Six Dollar ($1,880,106) purchase money mortgage in favor of Sidney Salomon, et al.; and a Twelve Thousand Five Hundred Dollar ($12,500)

      mortgage in favor of Harold Kravitz. When Petitioners took title to this real property, they took title subject to three outstanding mortgages.


    13. The Hearing Officer further in summary finds: The transactions related in the foregoing findings of fact ultimately transferred title of real property to Bayshore 21, Inc., pursuant to an agreement dated April 17, 1974. Fee simple title was then transferred from Bayshore, Inc., to Petitioners by Quit-Claim Deed dated March 3, 1975, subject to mortgage liens.


      CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


    14. Section 20i.02 Tax on deeds and other instruments relating to lands, etc.- provides:


"(1) On deeds, instruments, or writings whereby any lands, tenements, or other realty, or any interest therein, shall be granted, assigned, transferred, or otherwise conveyed to, or vested in, the purchaser, or any other person by his

direction, on each $100 of the consideration therefor the tax shall be for 30 cents.

When the full amount of the consideration for the"' execution, assignment, transfer, or conveyance is not shown in the face

of such deed, instrument, document, or writing, the tax shall be at the rate of

30 cents for each 100 or fractional part thereof of the consideration there for."


The mortgages on the property which the Petitioners are paying were the consideration for the deed. c.f. Florida Department of Revenue v. Dearia, 338 So.2d 838. The amount of consideration is ascertainable by adding the amount of the mortgages. Petitioners are liable for documentary stamp taxes pursuant to the foregoing statute in the amount of the mortgage liens outstanding and subject to be paid at the time of the conveyance.


RECOMMENDATION


Affirm the assessment of documentary stamp taxes made by the Respondent in this cause. DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of March, 1977, in Tallahassee, Florida.


DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings Room 101, Collins Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301

(904) 488-9675

COPIES FURNISHED:


Harold F. X. Purnell, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol

Tallahassee, Florida 32304


Eugene J. Howard, Esquire 2212 Biscayne Boulevard

Miami, Florida 33137


Docket for Case No: 75-001219
Issue Date Proceedings
May 19, 1977 Final Order filed.
Mar. 30, 1977 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 75-001219
Issue Date Document Summary
May 18, 1977 Agency Final Order
Mar. 30, 1977 Recommended Order Mortgages for quitclaim makes documentary stamp tax due on property transfer.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer