STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ) BOARD OF BARBERS, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) CASE NO. 89-2173
)
RICARDO BLANCO, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings by its duly designated Hearing Officer, James E. Bradwell, held a public hearing in this case on June 15, 1989, in Tampa, Florida.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Charles F. Tunnicliff, Esquire Chief Attorney
Professions Section
130 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0750
For Respondent: Ricardo Blanco, Pro Se
6919 North Cameron Avenue Tampa, Florida 33614
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
Whether or not Respondent practiced barbering without a current active license in violation of Sections 476.204(1)(a) and (h), Florida Statutes.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Petitioner, Department of Professional Regulation, is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of barbering pursuant to Section 20.30, Florida Statutes and Chapter 476, Florida Statutes.
Ricardo Blanco, Respondent herein, during times material hereto, was not licensed to practice barbering in Florida.
On September 30, 1988, Steve Yovine, an inspector employed by Petitioner, Board of Barbers, made a routine inspection of Vic's Barber Shop located at 9010 Hickory Circle in Tampa, Florida. At that time, Respondent was practicing barbering and had been so doing since approximately September 29, 1988. 1/
Since Inspector Yovine's inspection of Vic's Barber Shop on September 30, 1988, Respondent has not practiced barbering without a license.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter of and parties to this action. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.
The parties were duly noticed pursuant to the notice of provisions of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes.
Section 476.194(1)(a), Florida Statutes, proscribes the practice of barbering without an active license as a barber issued pursuant to Chapter 476, Florida Statutes. Section 476.204(1)(a), Florida Statutes, proscribes an unlicensed person from holding himself out as a barber. And, Section 476.204(1)(h) makes it unlawful for any person to violate any provision of Section 476.194, Florida Statutes.
Clear and convincing evidence was offered herein to establish that Respondent, on September 30, 1988, engaged in the practice of barbering without an active license within the purview of Section 476.194(1)(a), Florida Statutes. Based thereon, Respondent engaged in unlawful conduct within the purview of Sections 476.204(1)(a) and (h), Florida Statutes.
Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions - of law, it is RECOMMENDED that:
Petitioner enter a Final Order imposing an administrative fine against Respondent in the amount of $100 which shall be payable within 30 days of entry of the Final Order entered herein. 2/
DONE AND ENTERED this 8th day of July, 1989, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
JAMES E. BRADWELL
Hearing Officer
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1550
(904) 488-9675
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 18th day of July, 1989.
ENDNOTES
1/ Although not relevant here, Respondent has since become licensed to practice barbering in Florida.
2/ This recommended penalty is in keeping with the guidelines provided in Chapter 21, Florida Administrative Code.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Charles F. Tunnicliff, Esquire Professions Section
Department of Professional Regulation
1940 North Monroe, Suite 60
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0750
Ricardo Blanco
6919 North Cameron Avenue Tampa, FL 33614
Kenneth E. Easley, Esquire General Counsel
Department of Professional Regulation
1940 North Monroe, Suite 60
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0729
Myrtle Aase, Executive Director Barbers' Board
Department of Professional Regulation
1940 North Monroe, Suite 60
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0729
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Jul. 18, 1989 | Recommended Order (hearing held , 2013). CASE CLOSED. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Nov. 06, 1989 | Agency Final Order | |
Jul. 18, 1989 | Recommended Order | Whether respondent engaged in the practice of barbering without a current active license. |
BARBER`S BOARD vs. JEAN MENE, D/B/A PALOMA DE ST. LOUIS, 89-002173 (1989)
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs AUDLEY BROWN, 89-002173 (1989)
BARBERS BOARD vs. JOHN SKWIERC, D/B/A MR. S. HAIRCUTTERY, 89-002173 (1989)
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs MASTER ROBINSON, JR., 89-002173 (1989)
BARBER`S BOARD vs JACQUELINE FENTON, D/B/A BAILEY UNISEX BARBER SHOP, 89-002173 (1989)