Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MICHAEL PAULSSON vs GULF COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 96-004576 (1996)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 96-004576 Visitors: 20
Petitioner: MICHAEL PAULSSON
Respondent: GULF COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Judges: DON W. DAVIS
Agency: Department of Environmental Protection
Locations: Port St. Joe, Florida
Filed: Sep. 26, 1996
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, May 9, 1997.

Latest Update: Jun. 16, 1997
Summary: Whether the application of Respondent Gulf County (County) for permit to install a beach access road, constructed of oyster shell or dolomite, at the stumphole area on Cape San Blas should be granted.Field permit to which Petitioner objects was properly issued. Petition should be denied.
96-4576

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


MICHAEL PAULSSON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 96-4576

)

GULF COUNTY and )

THE STATE OF FLORIDA ) DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION, )

)

Respondents. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a formal hearing was held in this cause on April 18, 1997, in Port St. Joe, Florida, by Don W. Davis, a duly designated Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Michael Paulsson, Pro Se

Route 1, Box 347B

Port St. Joe, Florida 32456 For Respondent Gulf County:

Timothy J. McFarland, Esquire Post Office Box 202

Port St. Joe, Florida 32457


For Respondent Department of Environmental Protection:


Lynette L. Ciardulli, Esquire Department of Environmental Protection Mail Station 35

3900 Commonwealth Boulevard

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


Whether the application of Respondent Gulf County (County) for permit to install a beach access road, constructed of oyster shell or dolomite, at the stumphole area on Cape San Blas should be granted.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


This matter began August 17, 1996, when Petitioner Michael Paulsson requested formal administrative proceedings with regard to issuance of a field permit for a beach access road to the County by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).

Subsequently, the Petition For Administrative Hearing was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings for conduct of formal proceedings.

Final hearing was convened on April 18, 1997, at which Respondents jointly presented the testimony of two witnesses and three exhibits which were admitted into evidence. Petitioner testified in his own behalf and presented one composite exhibit which was admitted into evidence. No transcript of the final hearing was provided.

The parties’ proposed recommended orders have been reviewed and utilized in the preparation of this recommended order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. On April 11, 1996, the County applied for a permit from DEP to install a beach access road constructed of oyster shell or dolomite over an area 275 feet in length by 12 feet wide at the stumphole area on Cape San Blas. The County owned the property at the site where a crude road bed to the beach already existed.

  2. On that same date, County Manager Donald Butler met with a DEP field engineer, William Fokes, on the site to determine the linear footage that would be necessary for the access road at the stumphole area. Fokes then issued the field permit for the access road to be constructed of oyster shell or dolomite over an area 275 feet in length by 12 feet wide.

  3. Since beach driving is permitted by the County in the area, the access road aids in preventing illegal crossing of beach dunes by motorists to get to the beach. Prior to issuance of the field permit and construction of the access road, the only legal motorist access to the beach was seven miles away.

  4. Permits to drive on the beach are issued by the County. DEP rules require that all applicants proposing to conduct permitted activities on a beach use a designated beach access. This road will allow access to conduct permitted activities, thereby preserving and enhancing public beach access.

  5. DEP will not permit a project that is expected to adversely impact the beach dune system. Although seaward of the

    Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) in the County, the area which is the subject of this field permit contained no dunes or vegetation since Hurricane Opal had flattened the area.

  6. Such a project cannot be permitted if the project will adversely impact existing upland property or property of others. In the instant case, neither the Petitioner’s property, which is located two miles away from the project site, or property of other owners in the area will be adversely impacted.

  7. The road is designed to be a non-rigid, pervious structure which causes less impact to any existing dune system. The road site is located on County property and provides logical and appropriate access.

  8. The construction of the road did not violate DEP prohibitions on permitting activities having adverse impact to marine turtles since the construction permit expired prior to the turtle nesting season.

  9. A requirement of field permit issuance is that the applicant and the DEP area engineer meet on site and review the project. This event occurred on April 11, 1996, when Butler and Fokes met on the site. Fokes determined that the project was within field permitting guidelines and issued the permit.

  10. Fokes was authorized to issue the field permit because the project fell in DEP’s category of a driveway or similar

    activity. Expected impacts of construction of the access road and a driveway are deemed similar by DEP.

  11. Subsequent review by DEP staff of Fokes’ issuance of the field permit determined that sufficient information had been provided to him for issuance of the permit, that the project falls in the category of minor activity and that no adverse impact to dunes, property of others, beach access or nesting marine turtles is expected.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  12. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over this subject matter and the parties to this action pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

  13. The County, as applicant for the permit, has the ultimate burden of proof in demonstrating entitlement to subject permit. Department of Transportation v. J.W.C. Company, Inc., 396 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

  14. Permits are required for construction seaward of the CCL. Section 161.053, Florida Statutes.

  15. The applicant has demonstrated compliance with special siting and design criteria contained in Section 161.053, Florida Statutes, and Rule 62B-33.005, Florida Administrative Code, requiring that the project ensure protection of the beach dune system, proposed or existing structures, adjacent properties and preservation of public beach access.

RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the foregoing findings of fact and the conclusions of law, it is,

RECOMMENDED:


That a final order be entered confirming the grant of the field permit which is the subject of this proceeding.

DONE and ENTERED this 9th day of May, 1997, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


DON W. DAVIS

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(904) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (904) 921-6847


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 9th day of May, 1997.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Lynette L. Ciardulli, Esquire Department of Environmental Protection

3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35

Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000


Michael Paulsson, Pro Se Route 1, Box 347B

Port St. Joe, FL 32456


Timothy J. McFarland, Esquire Post Office Box 202

Port St. Joe, FL 32457

Virginia B. Wetherell, Secretary Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard

Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000


Perry Odom, Esquire

Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard

Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to this recommended order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 96-004576
Issue Date Proceedings
Jun. 16, 1997 Final Order filed.
May 09, 1997 Recommended Order (hearing held , 2013). CASE CLOSED.
May 09, 1997 Recommended Order sent out. Hearing Date 04/18/97.
Apr. 30, 1997 Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection`s, Motion to Accept its Proposed Recommended Order as Timely; Respondent Department of Environmental Protection`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Apr. 28, 1997 Letter to DWD from M. Paulsson Re: A Short Revue filed.
Apr. 18, 1997 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Apr. 16, 1997 Department of Environmental Protection`s First Interrogatories to Respondent, Gulf County (filed via facisimile) filed.
Mar. 25, 1997 Order Designating Location of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 4/18/97; 9:30am; Port St. Joe)
Mar. 10, 1997 (Card) Letter to WAB from M. Paulsson (RE: confirming that Judge has copy of photo of road that Petitioner marked) filed.
Feb. 27, 1997 Order Rescheduling Hearing sent out. (hearing rescheduled for 4/18/97; 9:30am; Port St. Joe)
Feb. 26, 1997 Department of Environmental Protection`s Motion to Compel Answers to Discovery filed.
Feb. 21, 1997 Letter to WAB from M. Paulsson (RE: available dates for hearing) filed.
Feb. 20, 1997 (Timothy McFarland) Notice of Filing Proposed List of Tentative Hearing Dates; Cover Letter (filed via facsimile).
Feb. 06, 1997 Order sent out. (Respondent`s unopposed motion for continuance is granted; parties to file available hearing dates by 2/20/97)
Jan. 31, 1997 (Gulf County) Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
Dec. 11, 1996 (DEP) (2) Notice and Certificate of Service of Interrogatories filed.
Nov. 12, 1996 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 2/5/97; 9:30am; Port St. Joe)
Oct. 30, 1996 Letter to CCA from M. Paulsson Re: Response to initial order; Letter to Sir from M. Paulsson Re: Requesting informal hearing; Letter to Ms. Weatherell from M. Paulsson Re Requesting hearing; Pictures filed.
Oct. 24, 1996 Department of Environmental Protection`s Response to Initial Order filed.
Oct. 09, 1996 Initial Order issued.
Sep. 26, 1996 Request for Assignment of Hearing Officer and Notice of Preservation of Record; Agency Field Permit Approval; Request for Formal Hearing, letter form filed.

Orders for Case No: 96-004576
Issue Date Document Summary
Jun. 13, 1997 Agency Final Order
May 09, 1997 Recommended Order Field permit to which Petitioner objects was properly issued. Petition should be denied.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer