Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MELTON NELSON vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, 99-000706 (1999)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 99-000706 Visitors: 17
Petitioner: MELTON NELSON
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT
Judges: STEPHEN F. DEAN
Agency: Department of Management Services
Locations: Fernandina Beach, Florida
Filed: Feb. 17, 1999
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, August 7, 2000.

Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2000
Summary: Whether Petitioner, Marilyn Nelson, the surviving spouse of Melton Nelson, is entitled to in-the-line-of-duty death benefits.Petitioner failed to show that deceased member`s death was in the line of duty by failing to introduce expert medical testimony in the issue.
99-0706.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


MARILYN NELSON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 99-0706

) DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, ) DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a formal hearing was held in this case on February 29, 2000, in Fernandina Beach, Florida, before the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its designated Administrative Law Judge, Stephen F. Dean.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Gary Baker, Esquire

Post Office Box 1177 Callahan, Florida 32011


For Respondent: Emily Moore, Esquire

Division of Retirement 2639 North Monroe Street Building D, Suite 230

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1560 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

Whether Petitioner, Marilyn Nelson, the surviving spouse of Melton Nelson, is entitled to in-the-line-of-duty death benefits.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


This case arose from the Division of Retirement's (Respondent) denial of Petitioner's Marilyn Nelson's request for in-the-line-of-duty (ILOD) death benefits on the account of the later Melton Nelson, a member of the Florida Retirement System (FRS).

By final agency action letter, dated September 22, 1998, Respondent denied the request of Marilyn Nelson for ILOD death benefits. Petitioner timely filed a request for hearing and the case was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the purpose of disposing of the Petition by Recommended Order.

Petitioner, represented by counsel, appeared and testified on her own behalf, but presented no other witnesses. Petitioner introduced Exhibit Nos. 1-4 which were received into evidence.

Respondent presented the testimony of its representative, Stanley Colvin, Administrator, Survivor Benefits Section, Bureau of Benefit Payments, and of the following staff of the Nassau County Public Works Department: Jack D.'Amato, Director of Public Works (supervisor of Melton Nelson); George Hartman, Assistant Road and Bridge Superintendent (co-worker and successor of Melton Nelson); William Johnson, (co-worker of Melton Nelson); and Lew Eason, Supervisor of the Human Relations Department. Respondent's Exhibits 1 through 12 were also received into evidence.

Respondent also filed a Motion for Official Recognition of relevant statutes and rules; the motion was granted. A transcript was not ordered.

At the close of the hearing, Respondent noted the absence of medical evidence establishing ILOD death and moved for a recommended order denying the Petition. Petitioner moved to keep the record open to present medical evidence in the form of deposition testimony.

Petitioner's motion was granted, and Petitioner was allowed


14 days (until March 14, 2000) to schedule the deposition of a licenses medical doctor. Petitioner failed to schedule a deposition, but filed the March 20, 2000, Sworn Statement of Arthur Forbes, a Physician's Assistant on or about May 22, 2000. Respondent moved to strike the sworn statement and close the record. Respondent's motion to strike was granted by Order of this tribunal issued June 20, 2000. This Order also provided that, "[I]n the absence of the setting of the Forbes' deposition, in 10 days (June 30, 2000) the record in this case will be closed, and the parties will have until July 24, 2000, to file their proposed findings."

On July 7, 2000, Respondent received a Notice of Taking Deposition of Arthur Forbes, mailed on July 5, 2000, setting the deposition at noon on Monday, July 17, 2000. On the morning of the scheduled deposition, the court reporter's office called to

advise the undersigned that Mr. Baker's office had cancelled the deposition because the witness was not served by the Sheriff's department. The deposition was not rescheduled, and has not been taken.

Respondent filed Proposed Findings of Fact which were read and considered. Petitioner did not file proposed findings.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Petitioner, Marilyn Nelson, is the surviving spouse of Melton Nelson, who died on May 7, 1998. Petitioner and Melton Nelson had been married since June 15, 1997.

  2. At the time of his death, Mr. Nelson was employed by Nassau County as the Assistant Road and Bridge Superintendent. He had been so employed for about 3 years.

  3. Donald B. Twiggs, M.D., was Mr. Nelson's treating physician. Dr. Twiggs, completed Mr. Nelson's Death Certificate, which states that Mr. Nelson died from cardiopulmonary arrest and coronary artery disease. There was no autopsy to determine the cause of death.

  4. During the course of his employment, Mr. Nelson was absent due to colds and other minor illnesses. His absences were not excessive and he had not complained either to his supervisor or to the personnel office of stress on the job. Further, Mr. Nelson did not advise his employer that his job was

    affecting his health or request accommodations based upon his physical condition.

  5. Marilyn Nelson was not aware that Mr. Nelson had heart problems.

  6. Mr. Nelson was being treated by Dr. Twiggs for adult onset diabetes, hypertension, and anxiety.

  7. As Assistant Road and Bridge Superintendent, Mr.


    Nelson's job was demanding and he often was on call due to road and bridge repairs. He supervised and assigned crews, but was not required customarily to do physically demanding work.

  8. Mr. Nelson was a "laid-back" supervisor who did not confront or correct his staff. He had the backing of management to discipline his subordinates. The employer was satisfied with Mr. Nelson's work performance. There were no confrontations or arguments between Mr. Nelson and his supervisor, and he was never "dressed-down" or threatened with loss of his job.

  9. Mr. Nelson reported to work about 7:00 a.m. on May 7, 1998. After a brief conversation with fellow workers and some of his subordinates, he walked back to his truck and collapsed. William Johnson, one of his subordinates, observed that Mr. Nelson "did not look good" and was "kinda red in the face." However, there had been no altercation, argument or confrontation, and Mr. Nelson did not appear upset.

  10. The Respondent denied Marilyn Nelson's application for in-line-of-duty (ILOD) death benefits, advising that, although Mr. Nelson suffered a heart attack while on the job, which resulted in his death, the heart attack was not caused by any job-related accident or injury.

  11. Marilyn Nelson's claim for death benefits was also denied by Workers' Compensation, which found that the injury was personal in nature and not job related.

  12. Marilyn Nelson presented no expert medical testimony to support her claim that Mr. Nelson's death arose out of the performance of his job duties.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  13. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over this subject matter and the parties to this action pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

  14. Marilyn Nelson is the surviving spouse of Melton Nelson, who was a member of the FRS at the time of his death.

  15. The Petitioner has the burden of proof in these proceedings. Young v. State, Department of Community Affairs,

    625 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 1993). Petitioner must demonstrate by a preponderance of competent evidence that she is entitled to the benefit she seeks. Agrico Chemical Co v. State Department of Environmental Regulation, 365 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

  16. Section 120.021(14), Florida Statutes, provides:


    (14) "Death-in-line-of-duty" means death arising out of and in the actual performance of duty required by a member's employment during his or her regularly scheduled working hours or irregular working hours as required by the employer. The administrator may require such proof as he or she deems necessary as to the time, date, and cause of death, including evidence from any available witnesses. Workers' compensation records under the provisions of Chapter 440 may also be used.


  17. Petitioner has the burden of proving her entitlement to ILOD death benefits. In such a case, competent medical evidence is probative of causation and required by rule. The Division of Retirement is guided by the rules of the State Retirement Commission as to what constitutes competent medical evidence. Rule 60R-1.00481, Florida Administrative Code,

    provides:


    1. Competent medical evidence of total and permanent disability is required for a determination of disability retirement eligibility.

    2. Competent medical evidence of total and permanent disability requires testimony of a licensed physician, either at the hearing, or in a deposition, in which the member and the Division of Retirement had an opportunity to participate.

    3. In cases of eligibility for in the line of duty disability benefits, competent medical evidence shall be required showing that an injury or illness, arising out of and in the actual performance required by the member's employment, was the substantial producing cause or aggravating cause of the member's total and permanent disability.

    4. Medical records may be admitted as hearsay, but shall be insufficient for a finding of disability retirement eligibility.


  18. Petitioner must establish, to a reasonable degree of medical probability, a causal relationship between the heart attack which led to Mr. Nelson's death, and the actual performance of his duties. Timmerman v. Division of Retirement,

    DOAH Case No. 98-5203.


  19. Petitioner did not produce any expert medical testimony regarding a causal relationship between the heart attack which led to Mr. Nelson's death and the performance of his duties. Petitioner failed to carry her burden of proof.

  20. Accordingly, Petitioner has not established that she is entitled to receive ILOD death benefits from the FRS account

of her late husband.


RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

RECOMMENDED:


That a final order be entered by the Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement holding that Petitioner's application for ILOD death benefits from the account of her late husband, Melton Nelson be denied.

DONE AND ENTERED this 7th day of August, 2000, in


Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


STEPHEN F. DEAN

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 7th day of August, 2000.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Emily Moore, Esquire Division of Retirement

Cedar Executive Center, Building D 2639 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1560


Gary Baker, Esquire Post Office Box 1177

Callahan, Florida 32011


Ron Poppell, Interim Director Division of Retirement

Cedars Executive Center, Building C 2639 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1560


Bruce Hoffmann, General Counsel Department of Management Services 4050 Esplanade Way

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 99-000706
Issue Date Proceedings
Dec. 01, 2000 Final Order filed.
Aug. 09, 2000 Motion to Extend Time for Filing Proposed Recommended Order (Petitioner) filed.
Aug. 07, 2000 Recommended Order issued (hearing held February 29, 2000) CASE CLOSED.
Jul. 24, 2000 Proposed Recommended Order (E. Moore) filed.
Jul. 24, 2000 Proposed Recommended Order. (filed by G. Baker via facsimile)
Jul. 20, 2000 Notice of Taking Deposition-A. Forbes filed.
Jun. 20, 2000 Order Granting Motion to Strike the Sworn Statement of Arthur Forbes sent out.
Jun. 09, 2000 Motion to Strike Sworn Statement of Arthur Forbes (Respondent) (filed via facsimile).
Jun. 09, 2000 Motion to Close Record and Dismiss Petition or, in the Alternative, to Close Record and set Date for Filing Proposed Recommended Orders (Respondent) (filed via facsimile).
May 15, 2000 Sworn Statement of Arthur Forbes filed.
May 09, 2000 Letter to G. Baker from E. Moore Re: Petitioner`s Exhibits (filed via facsimile).
Feb. 29, 2000 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Feb. 28, 2000 (Respondent) Motion for Official Recognition; (Respondent) Amended Notice of Filing filed.
Feb. 24, 2000 (Respondent) Motion to Allow Testimony of Agency Representative by Phone (filed via facsimile).
Feb. 11, 2000 (Respondent) Motion to Compel (filed via facsimile).
Jan. 10, 2000 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for February 29, 2000; 1:00 p.m.; Fernandina Beach, FL)
Dec. 01, 1999 Response to November 17,1999, Order Continuing Case in Abeyance (filed via facsimile).
Nov. 17, 1999 Order Continuing Case in Abeyance sent out. (Parties to advise status by November 30, 1999.)
Jul. 29, 1999 Order Cancelling Hearing and Abating Case sent out. (Parties to advise status by 09/29/1999)
Jul. 20, 1999 (Respondent) Notice of Filing; Respondent`s 9/22/98, Final Agency Action Letter; Respondent`s 7/23/99, Letter of Intent to Deny Benefits filed.
Jul. 19, 1999 Memo to G. Baker from E. Moore Re: Conference call (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 15, 1999 Notice of Service of Respondent`s First Interrogatories to Petitioner (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 15, 1999 Letter to G. Baker from E. Moore Re: Status of Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 08, 1999 Notice of Service of Respondent`s First Interrogatories to Petitioner; Respondent`s Request for the Production of Documents filed.
Jun. 21, 1999 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 10:15am; Fernandina Beach; 7/28/99)
Jun. 18, 1999 Fax cover sheet memo to Judge Dean from E. Moore Re: No objection to Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
Jun. 17, 1999 Respondent`s Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
Mar. 29, 1999 Notice of Hearing and Order sent out. (hearing set for 6/23/99; 10:15am; Fernandina Beach)
Mar. 18, 1999 Letter to Judge from E. Moore re: Reply to Initial Order (filed via facsimile) rec`d
Feb. 19, 1999 Initial Order issued.
Feb. 17, 1999 Notice of Election to Request Assignment of Administrative Law Judge rec`d
Feb. 17, 1999 Petition (letter form); Agency Action Letter (filed via facsimile).

Orders for Case No: 99-000706
Issue Date Document Summary
Dec. 01, 2000 Agency Final Order
Aug. 07, 2000 Recommended Order Petitioner failed to show that deceased member`s death was in the line of duty by failing to introduce expert medical testimony in the issue.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer