Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

D. GREGORY RUCK vs BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, 05-002033RX (2005)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 05-002033RX Visitors: 42
Petitioner: D. GREGORY RUCK
Respondent: BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
Judges: BARBARA J. STAROS
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, November 10, 2010.

Latest Update: Nov. 10, 2010
Summary: Whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 61G15-20.006(2) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority pursuant to Subsection 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2004).Petitioner presented evidence that the amount of attorney`s fees was reasonable. Fees are therefore awarded pusuant to Section 120.595(3), Florida Statutes.
05-2033 Second FO.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


  1. GREGORY RUCK,


    Petitioner,


    vs.


    BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS,


    Respondent.

    )

    )

    )

    )

    ) Case No. 05-2033RX

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )


    FINAL ORDER ON ATTORNEY'S FEES


    STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


    Whether Petitioner is entitled to attorney's fees and costs pursuant to Section 120.595(3), Florida Statutes, and if so, in what amount.

    PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


    The undersigned entered a Final Order in the above-styled case on November 23, 2005. In that Final Order, the undersigned retained jurisdiction to determine Petitioner, D. Gregory Ruck's entitlement to attorney's fees and costs pursuant to Section 120.595(3), Florida Statutes.

    On December 13, 2005, Petitioner filed a Motion for Attorney's Fees pursuant to Section 120.595(3), Florida Statutes, and an Affidavit Regarding Reasonableness of Attorney's Fees and Costs Affidavit. Respondent did not file

    any response in opposition to the Motion for Attorney's Fees.1/ There being no opposition to the motion, this matter is determined on the pleadings.2/

    FINDINGS OF FACT


    1. Petitioner, D. Gregory Ruck, challenged Florida Administrative Code Rule 61G15-20.006(2), as a result of Respondent's denial of his application for licensure. By Final Order issued November 23, 2005, Petitioner was the prevailing party in the above-styled case.

    2. Petitioner made his first formal demand for attorney's fees and costs in his Petition for an Administrative Determination of the Invalidity of Rule 61G15- 20.006(2) which initiated this proceeding.

    3. On December 13, 2005, Petitioner filed a Motion for Attorney's Fees and filed an Affidavit Regarding Reasonableness of Attorney's Fees and Costs on December 13, 2005. Petitioner seeks to recover $13,145 in fees. The content of the Motion and the Affidavit address fees only and do not address costs.

    4. By way of filing the Affidavit, Petitioner presented competent evidence that the requested attorney's fees were reasonable based upon the hourly rate charged, in that the hourly rate charged is within the standard market rates for the experience level of the attorney involved, the complexity

      of the work involved, and the caliber of the services provided in this case.

    5. By way of the Affidavit, Petitioner presented competent evidence that the amount of time expended by Petitioner's counsel in the services performed on behalf of Petitioner in pursuing this rule challenge was reasonable.

    6. Respondent presented no evidence showing that its actions were substantially justified in that there was a reasonable basis in law or fact at the time the actions were taken by the agency. Respondent presented no evidence showing that special circumstances exist which would make the award unjust.

    7. Further, Respondent did not file any challenge or opposition to the reasonableness of the amount requested in the Motion for Attorney's Fees.

      CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


    8. Subsection 120.595(3), Florida Statutes, reads in pertinent part as follows:

      (3) CHALLENGES TO EXISTING AGENCY RULES PURSUANT TO SECTION 120.56(3).- If the court or administrative law judge declares a rule or portion of a rule invalid pursuant to s. 120.56(3), a judgment or order shall be rendered against the agency for reasonable costs and reasonable attorney's fees, unless the agency demonstrates that its actions were substantially justified or special circumstances exist which would make the award unjust. An agency's actions are

      'substantially justified' if there was a reasonable basis in law and fact at the time the actions were taken by the agency....No award of attorney's fees as provided by this subsection shall exceed

      $15,000.


    9. Petitioner presented evidence that the requested attorney's fees were reasonable based upon the hourly rate charged and the amount of time expended.

    10. Respondent presented no evidence showing that its actions were substantially justified in that there was a reasonable basis in law or fact at the time the actions were taken by the agency.

    11. Respondent presented no evidence that special circumstances exist which would make the award unjust.

    12. Accordingly, Petitioner is entitled to recover


$13,145 in attorney's fees pursuant to Section 120.595(3), Florida Statutes.

ORDER


Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

ORDERED:


The Motion for Attorney's Fees is granted, and Petitioner is awarded $13,145 in attorney's fees.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of January, 2006, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

___________________________________ BARBARA J. STAROS

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 25th day of January, 2006.


ENDNOTES


1/ Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-106.204 provides parties with an opportunity to file responses in opposition to motions.


2/ All references to the Florida Statutes will be to Florida Statutes 2005, unless otherwise indicated.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Edwin A. Bayo, Esquire Gray Robinson, P.A. Post Office Box 11189

Tallahassee, Florida 32302-3189


Lee Ann Gustafson, Esquire Office of the Attorney General The Capitol, Plaza Level 01 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050

Josefina Tomayo, General Counsel Department of Business and

Professional Regulation Northwood Centre

1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202


Doug Sunshine, Esquire

Vice President for Legal Affairs

Florida Engineers Management Corporation 2507 Callaway Road

Tallahassee, Florida 32303-5267


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW


A party who is adversely affected by this Final Order is entitled to judicial review pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings are commenced by filing the original notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings and a copy, accompanied by filing fees prescribed by law, with the District Court of Appeal, First District, or with the District Court of Appeal in the Appellate District where the party resides. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.


Docket for Case No: 05-002033RX
Issue Date Proceedings
Nov. 10, 2010 Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
Nov. 10, 2010 Letter to Judge Staros from S. Maige regarding a settlement filed.
Jan. 28, 2008 Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding records to the agency.
Jun. 01, 2007 Second Mandate filed.
Jun. 01, 2007 Second Opinion filed.
May 24, 2007 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Appellee petition for attorney`s fees is granted; Appellant is directed to forward the attorney`s fee matter to DOAH for further proceedings.
Jan. 12, 2007 Index, Record, and Certificate of Record sent to the District Court of Appeal.
Dec. 22, 2006 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Appellant`s initial brief filed December 14, 2006, is accepted as timely filed.
Nov. 13, 2006 Index (of the Record) sent to the parties of record.
Sep. 28, 2006 Letter to A. Cole from J. Wheeler acknowledging receipt of Notice of Appeal, DCA Case No. 1D06-4996 filed.
Sep. 26, 2006 Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal sent to the First District Court of Appeal this date.
Sep. 25, 2006 Notice of Appeal filed.
Aug. 31, 2006 Final Order on Attorney`s Fees Following Remand. CASE CLOSED.
Aug. 16, 2006 Respondent`s Proposed Final Order Regarding Attorneys Fees filed.
Aug. 16, 2006 Motion for Official Recognition filed.
Aug. 09, 2006 Order Granting Extension of Time (Proposed Final Orders to be filed by August 16, 2006).
Aug. 08, 2006 Respondent`s Request for Extension of Time to File Proposed Final Order Regarding Attorneys Fees filed.
Aug. 03, 2006 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jul. 14, 2006 Order Cancelling Hearing (Motion for Cancellation of Hearing and for Leave to Submit Proposed Final Orders granted; proposed final orders to be filed by August 8, 2006).
Jul. 13, 2006 Joint Motion for Cancellation of Hearing and for Leave to Submit Proposed Final Orders filed.
Jun. 23, 2006 Agency`s court reporter confirmation letter filed with the Judge.
Jun. 20, 2006 Affidavit Regarding Reasonableness of Attorneys` Fees filed.
Jun. 16, 2006 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for July 18, 2006; 9:30 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
Jun. 12, 2006 Notice of Appeal filed.
Jun. 12, 2006 Joint Motion for Remand for Evidentiary Hearing filed.
Jun. 08, 2006 Agency`s court reporter confirmation letter filed with the Judge.
Jun. 08, 2006 Mandate filed. CASE REOPENED.
May 23, 2006 Opinion filed.
May 23, 2006 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Order stating that this case will be assigned to the same panel of judges for a disposition on the merits is withdrawn.
May 22, 2006 Notice of Delay in Transmitting the Record to the District Court of Appeal.
Mar. 22, 2006 Invoice for the record on appeal mailed.
Mar. 22, 2006 Index (of the Record) sent to the parties of record.
Mar. 09, 2006 BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Appellant`s motion seeking consolidation of the above appeals is denied.
Feb. 21, 2006 Directions to Clerk filed.
Feb. 06, 2006 Letter to A. Cole from J. Wheeler acknowledging receipt of notice of appeal filed.
Feb. 01, 2006 Notice of Appeal filed and Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal mailed to the First District Court of Appeal.
Jan. 25, 2006 Final Order on Attorney`s Fees. CASE CLOSED.
Dec. 13, 2005 Affidavit Regarding Reasonableness of Attorneys` Fees and Costs filed.
Dec. 13, 2005 Motion for Attorneys` Fees filed (DOAH Case No. 05-4537F established).
Nov. 23, 2005 Final Order (hearing held October 4, 2005). DOAH JURISDICTION RETAINED.
Nov. 04, 2005 Respondent`s Proposed Final Order filed.
Nov. 01, 2005 Order (Respondent`s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time granted, Proposed Final Orders are due on November 4, 2005).
Nov. 01, 2005 Motion for Extension of Time filed.
Oct. 28, 2005 Petitioner`s Proposed Final Order filed.
Oct. 19, 2005 Final Hearing (transcript) filed.
Oct. 04, 2005 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Oct. 04, 2005 Letter to For the Record Reporting from D. Blaricum regarding confirmation of court reporter services filed.
Sep. 30, 2005 Pre-hearing Stipulation filed.
Sep. 30, 2005 Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions filed.
Sep. 30, 2005 Respondent`s Answers to Requests for Admissions filed.
Sep. 30, 2005 Notice of Filing Petitioner`s Requests for Admissions and Respondent`s Answers to Requests for Admissions filed.
Aug. 31, 2005 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 4, 2005; 9:30 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
Aug. 23, 2005 Motion for Leave to File Status Report and Status Report filed.
Aug. 01, 2005 Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by August 22, 2005).
Aug. 01, 2005 Joint Motion for Continuance filed.
Jul. 28, 2005 Notice of Serving Answers to Requests for Admissions and Petitioner`s First Interrogatories filed.
Jul. 22, 2005 Notice of Service of Petitioner`s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Admissions filed.
Jun. 30, 2005 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for August 4, 2005; 9:30 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
Jun. 28, 2005 Notice of Appearance and Motion for Continuance filed.
Jun. 28, 2005 Motion for Tribunal to use Correct Style of Case filed.
Jun. 10, 2005 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for July 8, 2005; 9:30 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
Jun. 10, 2005 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Jun. 10, 2005 Order of Assignment.
Jun. 03, 2005 Rule Challenge transmittal letter to Liz Cloud from Ann Cole copying Scott Boyd and the Agency General Counsel.
Jun. 03, 2005 Petition for an Formal Administrative Determination of the Invalidity of Rule 61G15-20.006(2), Florida Administrative Code filed.

Orders for Case No: 05-002033RX
Issue Date Document Summary
May 31, 2007 Second Mandate
May 15, 2007 Second Opinion
Aug. 31, 2006 Remanded from non-Agy Upper Tribunal Petitioner is entitled to receive attorneys` fees for the underlying proceeding on the merits.
Jun. 07, 2006 Mandate
May 22, 2006 Opinion
Jan. 25, 2006 DOAH Final Order Petitioner presented evidence that the amount of attorney`s fees was reasonable. Fees are therefore awarded pusuant to Section 120.595(3), Florida Statutes.
Nov. 23, 2005 DOAH Final Order Rule 61G15-20.006(2) constitutes an accreditation requirement that does not exist by statute, and is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority in that it enlarges and contravenes the specific provisions of the law implemented.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer