STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION, INC., Petitioner, vs. COLLIER COUNTY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT and SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Respondents.
| ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) | Case No. 08-1063 |
RECOMMENDED ORDER DISMISSAL
On February 28, 2008, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH), among other things, an Amended Petition for Administrative Hearing filed by Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc., and Collier County's Motion to Dismiss Complaint [sic], which is based primarily on lack of standing. Petitioner filed a Response in Opposition, and SFWMD joined in all of the Motion to Dismiss except for one paragraph.
On March 11, 2008, the Collier County Water and Sewer District (the County) filed a Motion for Official Recognition of circuit court filings, which SFWMD did not oppose but Petitioner did oppose. Petitioner subsequently filed a Response in Opposition on grounds of relevance.
A telephonic hearing was held on the pending motions on March 14, 2008. All the written and oral arguments have been considered.
First, the County's Motion for Official Recognition is granted, although the circuit court filings are only marginally relevant.
As to the County's Motion to Dismiss, Petitioner's standing is based on alleged injury-in-fact that is not "of sufficient immediacy." § 403.412(5), Fla. Stat. (2007). See also Agrico Chem. Co. v. Dept. of Environmental Reg., 406 So. 2d 478, 482 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). To the extent that sufficiently immediate injury-in-fact might be alleged, the alleged injury-in-fact is not "of the type and nature intended to be protected" by the governing statutes and rules, in particular Section 373.250(2)(c), Florida Statutes. Id. For that reason, the Motion to Dismiss is granted. Under Section 120.569(2)(c), Florida Statutes, dismissal should be with prejudice at this time, Petitioner already having been given leave to amend once, and the defect in the pleading not being curable by further amendment.
For the foregoing reasons, it is
RECOMMENDED that SFWMD dismiss the Amended Petition for Administrative Hearing with prejudice.
RECOMMENDED this 20th day of March, 2008, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
S
J. LAWRENCE JOHNSTON Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 20th day of March, 2008.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Carol Ann Wehle, Executive Director South Florida Water Management District 3301 Gun Club Road
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-4680
Robert D. Pritt, Esquire Roetzel & Andress, LPA Trianon Centre, Third Floor 850 Park Shore Drive Naples, Florida 34103-3587
Edward P. de la Parte, Jr., Esquire de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A.
101 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 3400 Tampa, Florida 33601-2350
Jennifer Bokankowitz, Esquire
South Florida Water Management District 3301 Gun Club Road, Mail Stop Code 1410 West Palm Beach, Florida 33406
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
May 15, 2008 | Agency Final Order | |
Mar. 20, 2008 | Recommended Order | An Recommended Order of Dismissal because the alleged injury was not immediate enough for standing. |
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs ALEXANDER P. ROBINSON, 08-001063 (2008)
WILLIAM B. SWAIM vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 08-001063 (2008)
RUSSELL SPENCER vs. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, 08-001063 (2008)
SYSLOGIC TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC. vs SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, 08-001063 (2008)