Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs SUSHIYAKI, INC., D/B/A SUSHIYAKI, 08-005960 (2008)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 08-005960 Visitors: 69
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO
Respondent: SUSHIYAKI, INC., D/B/A SUSHIYAKI
Judges: DANIEL MANRY
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Cape Coral, Florida
Filed: Dec. 02, 2008
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, March 5, 2009.

Latest Update: Apr. 08, 2009
Summary: The issue is whether Respondent violated Section 562.02 and Subsection 561.29(1), Florida Statutes (2007), by possessing on May 3, 2008, four bottles of alcohol that Respondent is not licensed to possess on the licensed premises.The licensee, who possessed unlicensed liquor on licensed premises, should pay an administrative fine of $1,000.00.
STATE OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND

)




PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,

)




DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES

)




AND TOBACCO,

)





)




Petitioner,

)





)




vs.

)

Case

No.

08-5960


)




SUSHIYAKI, INC., d/b/a

)




SUSHIYAKI,

)

)




Respondent.

)




)





RECOMMENDED ORDER


Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Daniel Manry conducted the final hearing of this case for the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) on February 17, 2009, in Cape Coral, Florida.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Michael J. Wheeler, Esquire

Department of Business and Professional Regulation

1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32303


For Respondent: (No appearance)


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


The issue is whether Respondent violated Section 562.02 and Subsection 561.29(1), Florida Statutes (2007), by possessing on May 3, 2008, four bottles of alcohol that Respondent is not licensed to possess on the licensed premises.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


Petitioner filed an Administrative Action against Respondent on June 18, 2008. Respondent timely requested an administrative hearing, and Petitioner referred the matter to DOAH to conduct the hearing.

At the hearing, Petitioner called one witness and submitted one composite exhibit for admission into evidence. Respondent did not appear and did not submit evidence.

The identity of the witness and exhibit and the rulings regarding each are reported in the record of the hearing.

Neither party requested a transcript of the hearing.


Petitioner timely filed its proposed recommended order (PRO) on February 19, 2009. Respondent did not file a PRO.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Petitioner is the agency responsible for regulating alcoholic beverage licenses in the state. Respondent is licensed to possess and sell beer and wine on the premises pursuant to License Number 46-05556, Series 2COP.

  2. A random inspection of the licensed premises on May 3, 2008, found four bottles of alcohol that Respondent is not licensed to possess on the premises. The alcohol consisted of: one, 1.75 liter bottle of Kettle One Vodka; two, 750 milliliter bottles of X-Rated Vodka; one, 1 liter bottle of Captain Morgan Rum; and one, 750 milliliter bottle of Tequila 1800 Silver.

  3. Petitioner requires each licensee to file a drawing of the licensed premises that, among other things, identifies the location of personal items kept on the premises. Respondent did not identify the bottles of alcohol described in the preceding paragraph as personal items on the drawing that Respondent filed with Petitioner.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  4. DOAH has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this proceeding. §§ 120.569 and 120.57(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). DOAH provided the parties with adequate notice of the final hearing.

  5. Petitioner has the burden of proof. Petitioner must show by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Action and the reasonableness of the proposed penalty. Osborne Stern & Co. v. Department of Banking and Finance, 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1996).

  6. For the reasons stated in the Findings of Fact, Petitioner showed by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Action. Petitioner also showed the reasonableness of its proposed administrative fine in the amount of $1,000.00.

RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

RECOMMENDED that Petitioner enter a final order finding Respondent guilty of the acts alleged and violations charged in the Administrative Action and imposing an administrative fine of

$1,000.00.


DONE AND ENTERED this 5th day of March, 2009, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

DANIEL MANRY

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 5th day of March, 2009.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Michael J. Wheeler, Esquire Department of Business and

Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32303


Marcus Beaubrun

Sushiyaki, Inc., d/b/a Sushiyaki 1306 Cape Coral Parkway East Cape Coral, Florida 33904

Ned Luczynski, General Counsel Department of Business and

Professional Regulation Northwood Centre

1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792


Cynthia Hill, Director

Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco

Department of Business and Professional Regulation

Northwood Centre

1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 08-005960
Issue Date Proceedings
Apr. 08, 2009 Final Order filed.
Mar. 05, 2009 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Mar. 05, 2009 Recommended Order (hearing held February 17, 2009). CASE CLOSED.
Feb. 19, 2009 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Feb. 17, 2009 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Feb. 02, 2009 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for February 17, 2009; 10:00 a.m.; Cape Coral, FL).
Jan. 27, 2009 Joint Motion for Continuance filed.
Dec. 24, 2008 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Dec. 24, 2008 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for February 2, 2009; 9:30 a.m.; Cape Coral, FL).
Dec. 23, 2008 Petitioner`s Response to Initial Order filed.
Dec. 22, 2008 Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions to Respondent filed.
Dec. 22, 2008 Notice of Service of Interrogatories filed.
Dec. 02, 2008 Initial Order.
Dec. 02, 2008 Administrative Action filed.
Dec. 02, 2008 Request for Hearing filed.
Dec. 02, 2008 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 08-005960
Issue Date Document Summary
Mar. 30, 2009 Agency Final Order
Mar. 05, 2009 Recommended Order The licensee, who possessed unlicensed liquor on licensed premises, should pay an administrative fine of $1,000.00.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer