STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS
JAMES SCHWEIM, HUD Case No. 04-10-1515-8
Petitioner, FCHR Case No. 2011H0038
v. DOAH Case No. 10-10219
CENTER LAKE OWNERS FCHR Order No. 11-073 ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Respondent.
/
Preliminary Matters
Petitioner James Schweim filed a housing discrimination complaint pursuant to the Fair Housing Act, Sections 760.20 - 760.37, Florida Statutes (2009), alleging that Respondent Center Lake Owners Association, Inc., committed a discriminatory housing practice by failing to make a reasonable accommodation for Petitioner’s alleged handicap.
The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on October 13, 2010, the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that a discriminatory housing practice had occurred.
Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from a Discriminatory Housing Practice and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.
An evidentiary hearing was held in Bradenton, Florida, on June 2, 2011, before Administrative Law Judge R. Bruce McKibben.
Judge McKibben issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated July 7, 2011.
The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.
Findings of Fact
A transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge was not filed with the Commission. In the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge, the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the Commission to consider. See National Industries, Inc. v. Commission on Human
Relations, et al., 527 So. 2d 894, at 897, 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Accord, Mack v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, FCHR Order No. 11-026 (March 17, 2011), Hall v. Villages of West Oaks HOA, FCHR Order No. 08-007 (January 14, 2008), Beach- Gutierrez v. Bay Medical Center, FCHR Order No. 05-011 (January 19, 2005), and
Waaser v. Streit’s Motorsports, FCHR Order No. 04-157 (November 30, 2004).
We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s findings of fact.
Conclusions of Law
We find the Administrative Law Judge’s application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.
We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s conclusions of law.
Exceptions
Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Order.
Dismissal
The Petition for Relief and Housing Discrimination Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice.
The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110.
DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of August , 2011. FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:
Commissioner Donna Elam, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Elena Flom; and
Commissioner Lizzette Romano
Filed this 30th day of August , 2011, in Tallahassee, Florida.
/s/ Violet Crawford, Clerk Commission on Human Relations
2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100
Tallahassee, FL 32301
(850) 488-7082
Copies furnished to:
James Schweim
3550 65th Avenue Circle East Sarasota, FL 34243
Center Lake Owners Association, Inc. c/o Mark Maynard, Esq.
West Coast Law, P.L.L.C. 4046 Sawyer Road, Suite D Sarasota, FL 34233
R. Bruce McKibben, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this 30th day of August , 2011.
By: /s/ Clerk of the Commission
Florida Commission on Human Relations
FCHR 2011H0038 HUD 04-10-1515-8 FCHR Order No. 11-073
Type of case: Housing
Basis of discrimination: handicap (failure to provide reasonable accommodation) Commission staff determination: No Cause
ALJ recommendation: dismissal
Commission panel final action: Adopt Recommended Order
Key Words: no transcript, handicap, (parking RV in violation of HOA rules)
ADDRESSES FOR NOTICE:
For Petitioner…..
James Schweim
3550 65th Avenue Circle East Sarasota, FL 34243
For Respondent…..
Center Lake Owners Association, Inc. c/o Mark Maynard, Esq.
West Coast Law, P.L.L.C. 4046 Sawyer Road, Suite D Sarasota, FL 34233
DOCKET INFORMATION:
Rec Order: Dismissal Transcript: No Exhibits: Yes Exceptions: No
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS
Order Approval/Disapproval
TO: FCHR Commissioners impaneled to decide the below-referenced case FROM: Jim Mallue, Assistant General Counsel
RE: Schweim v. Center Lake Owners Association, Inc.
DOAH 10-10219; FCHR 2011H00388; FCHR Order No. 11-073
Accompanying this “Order Approval/Disapproval” page is a copy of a final order drafted by the Panel’s counsel / legal advisor containing counsel’s recommendation to you regarding the disposition of the case. This case has been returned to the Commission from the Division of Administrative Hearings.
Please review the case record and determine whether you are in agreement with the recommendations contained in the order drafted by Commission counsel.
Further, please indicate your approval or disapproval of the order drafted by Commission counsel by signing on the appropriate line below, and returning this form by FAX to Denise Crawford in the Commission’s Tallahassee office at 850-488-5291, and by then returning this form by Mail to Ms. Denise Crawford, Clerk of the Commission, Florida Commission on Human Relations, 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100, Tallahassee, FL 32301. If a majority of the panel approves of the order, the order will be entered by the Clerk of the Commission.
# # #
I approve of the order drafted to reflect the Commission’s disposition of this matter:
, Commissioner.
I do not approve of the order drafted to reflect the Commission’s disposition of this matter:
, Commissioner.
END
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Aug. 30, 2011 | Agency Final Order | |
Jul. 07, 2011 | Recommended Order | Petitioner did not satisfy burden of proof regarding discrimination based on a disability. |