Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PIRAMIAH ELAYAPERUMAL vs PALL CORPORATION, 14-002211 (2014)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 14-002211 Visitors: 27
Petitioner: PIRAMIAH ELAYAPERUMAL
Respondent: PALL CORPORATION
Judges: DIANE CLEAVINGER
Agency: Commissions
Locations: Pierce, Florida
Filed: May 15, 2014
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, July 16, 2015.

Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2015
Summary: The issue in this proceeding is whether the Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice against Petitioner in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act.Evidence did not show discrimination based on age.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


PIRAMIAH ELAYAPERUMAL, EEOC No. 15D201400055


Petitioner, FCHR No. 2013-01955


v. DOAH No.

PALL CORPORATION, FCHR Order No. 15-061


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITION RELIEF FROM AN UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner filed a complaint of discrimination pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Sections 760.01 - Florida Statutes alleging that Respondent Pall Corporation committed an unlawful employment practice on the basis of Petitioner's age (DOB: by terminating Petitioner from employment.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on April

the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice, and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held in Pensacola, Florida, on July and March 26, before Administrative Law Judge Diane Cleavinger.

Judge Cleavinger issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated July

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.


Findings of Fact


We find the Administrative Law Judge'sfindingsof fact to be supported by competent substantial evidence.

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge'sfindingsof fact.


Filed September 17, 2015 11:07 AM Division of Administrative Hearings


Conclusions of Law


We the Administrative Law Judge's application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.

We note that in analyzing whether Petitioner had established a prima facie case of age discrimination the Administrative Law Judge concluded, ".. was a member of a protected class (over 40)..." Recommended Order, 26.

Commission panels have concluded that one of the elements for establishing a prima facie case of age discrimination under the Florida Civil Rights Act of is a showing that individuals similarly-situated to Petitioner of a "different" age were treated more favorably, and Commission panels have noted that the age "40" has no significance in the interpretation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. See, e.g., Downs v. Shear Express, Inc., FCHR Order No. 06-036 (May 24, 2006), and cases and analysis set out therein; see also, Boles v. Santa Rosa County Office, FCHR Order No. (February 8, 2008), and cases and analysis set out therein.

Consequently, we yet again note that the age "40" has no significance in the interpretation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. Accord, e.g., Torrence v. Hendrick Honda FCHR Order No. 15-027 (May 21, 2015), Grasso v. Agency for Health Care Administration. FCHR Order No. 15-001 (January 14, 2015), Cox v. Gulf Breeze Resorts Realty, Inc., FCHR Order No. 09-037 (April 2009), Toms v. Marion County School Board, FCHR Order No. 07-060 (November 7, 2007), and Stewart v. Pasco County Board of County Commissioners, d/b/a Pasco County Library System, FCHR Order No. 07-050 (September 25, 2007). But, City of Hollywood, Florida v.

986 So. 2d 634 (4th DCA 2008).

This does not impact the Administrative Law Judge's conclusion that Petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination. See Recommended Order,

27.

With this comment, we adopt the Administrative Law Judge's conclusions of law.


Exceptions


Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's Recommended Order.


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days


of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure


DONE AND ORDERED this day of

FOR THE FLORIDA ON HUMAN RELATIONS:


Commissioner Michael Keller, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner J. Jeff Graber; and

Commissioner Rebecca Steele


in Tallahassee, Florida.


Clerk /

Commission on Human Relations 4075 Esplanade Way, Room Tallahassee, FL 32399

(850) 488-7082


Copies furnished to:


Piramiah

Eagle Trace Lane

MN 55129


Corporation

c/o Colin A. Thakkar, Esq. Jackson Lewis,

Riverside Avenue, Ste. 902 Jacksonville, FL 32202


Diane Cleavinger, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH


James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel


I1HEREBYYCERTIFYYtmhaatt aacopy of the foregoing hnaass bbeen mailed to the above

listed addressees this / day of ,


By:

Clerk of the

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 14-002211
Issue Date Proceedings
Sep. 17, 2015 Agency Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
Jul. 28, 2015 Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding two-volume Transcript, along with Petitioner and Respondent's Exhibits not offered into evidence, to the agency.
Jul. 16, 2015 Recommended Order (hearing held July 14, 2014, and March 26, 2015). CASE CLOSED.
Jul. 16, 2015 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
May 12, 2015 Respondent's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed.
Apr. 30, 2015 Proposed Order Requested by Petitioner Elayaperumal; Medical Records filed (not available for viewing).
Apr. 28, 2015 Transcript of Proceedings (not available for viewing) filed.
Mar. 26, 2015 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Mar. 10, 2015 Petitioner Elayaperuma;'s (Proposed) Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
Feb. 11, 2015 Court Reporter Request filed.
Jan. 08, 2015 Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for March 26 and 27, 2015; 10:00 a.m., Central Time; Pensacola, FL).
Nov. 24, 2014 Request for Enough time to Examine all Witnesses filed.
Nov. 07, 2014 Respondent Pall Corporation's Notice of Availability for Continued Hearing filed.
Oct. 28, 2014 Cancellation of Request for Court Reporter filed.
Oct. 24, 2014 CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held.
Oct. 24, 2014 Order (on Pall Corporation's Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoenas Ad Testificandum Commanding Appearance of Piramiah Elayaperuma).
Oct. 24, 2014 Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by November 7, 2014).
Oct. 23, 2014 Respondents Motion for Continuance of Hearing Set for October 30 and 31, 2014 (with exhibit) filed.
Oct. 23, 2014 Respondent's Motion for Continuance of Hearing Set for October 30 and 31, 2014 filed.
Oct. 20, 2014 Subpoena ad Testificandum (Rick Morris) filed.
Oct. 20, 2014 Counter to Pall Corporation's Motion to Squash my Subpoena filed.
Oct. 16, 2014 Pall Corporation's Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoenas Ad Testificandum Commanding Appearance of Piramiah Elayaperumal filed.
Sep. 29, 2014 Subpoena ad Testificandum (Linda Carlisle) filed.
Sep. 29, 2014 Subpoena ad Testificandum (Hassan Ait-Haddou) filed.
Sep. 29, 2014 Subpoena ad Testificandum (Martin Smith) filed.
Sep. 29, 2014 Subpoena ad Testificandum (Wils Wixwat) filed.
Sep. 29, 2014 Subpoena ad Testificandum (Stanley Kidd) filed.
Sep. 29, 2014 Subpoena ad Testificandum (Fran Onyemauwa) filed.
Sep. 29, 2014 Subpoena ad Testificandum (Munal Tinwala) filed.
Sep. 18, 2014 Order Denying Request to Participate by Video Conference.
Sep. 12, 2014 Petitioner Elayaperumal's Change of Residence filed.
Sep. 12, 2014 Court Reporter Request filed.
Sep. 12, 2014 Reagrding a New Address filed.
Sep. 10, 2014 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 30 and 31, 2014; 10:00 a.m., Central Time; Pensacola, FL).
Aug. 08, 2014 Transcript (not available for viewing) filed.
Jul. 14, 2014 CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to date not certain.
Jul. 14, 2014 Petitioner's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
Jul. 14, 2014 Petitioner Elayaperumal's Prehearing Statement filed.
Jul. 08, 2014 Order Granting Motion to Withdraw and Denying Motion to Extend Time to File Prehearing Statements.
Jul. 07, 2014 Pall Corporation's Pre-hearing Statement filed.
Jul. 07, 2014 (Petitioner's) Motion to Withdraw and Extend Time to File Prehearing Notices filed.
Jun. 10, 2014 Court Reporter Notice filed.
Jun. 10, 2014 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Jun. 10, 2014 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for July 14, 2014; 10:00 a.m., Central Time; Pensacola, FL).
Jun. 03, 2014 Order Accepting Qualified Representative.
Jun. 02, 2014 Motion to be Recognized as Petitioner's Qualified Representative filed.
May 30, 2014 Notice of Appearance (Jamison Jesup) filed.
May 23, 2014 Respondent Pall Corporation's Response to Initial Order filed.
May 22, 2014 Notice of Appearance (Colin Thakkar) filed.
May 15, 2014 Initial Order.
May 15, 2014 Employment Complaint of Discrimination filed.
May 15, 2014 Notice of Determination: No Cause filed.
May 15, 2014 Determination: No Cause filed.
May 15, 2014 Petition for Relief filed.
May 15, 2014 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.

Orders for Case No: 14-002211
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 17, 2015 Agency Final Order
Jul. 16, 2015 Recommended Order Evidence did not show discrimination based on age.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer