Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

VALERIE WALTERS vs PINE RUN ASSOCIATION, INC., 16-001076 (2016)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 16-001076 Visitors: 19
Petitioner: VALERIE WALTERS
Respondent: PINE RUN ASSOCIATION, INC.
Judges: LINZIE F. BOGAN
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Feb. 24, 2016
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, June 17, 2016.

Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2016
Summary: Whether Respondent violated the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, as alleged in the Housing Charge of Discrimination filed by Petitioner on or about October 9, 2015.Petitioner failed to meet her burden of proving that Respondent discriminated against her in violation of the Fair Housing Act.
TempHtml



STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


VALERIE WALTERS HUD Case No. 04-16-0030-8


Petitioner, FCHR Case No. 2016H0191


v. DOAH No.

PINE RUN ASSOCIATION, INC., FCHR Order No. 16-045


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITIO N FOR

RELIE F FRO M A DISCRIMINATORY HOUSING PRACTIC E


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner Valerie Walters filed a housing discrimination complaint pursuant to the Fair Housing Act, Sections 760.20 - 760.37, Florida Statutes alleging that Respondent Pine Run Association, Inc., committed a discriminatory housing practice by failing to provide a reasonable accommodation for Petitioner's disability.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on January 22, the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable

cause to believe that a discriminatory housing practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from a Discriminatory Housing Practice and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held by video teleconference at sites in Tampa and Tallahassee, Florida, on May 3, before Administrative Law Judge Linzie F. Bogan.

Judge Bogan issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated June 17,

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.


Findings of Fact


A transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge was not filed with the Commission. In the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge, the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the Commission to consider. See National Industries. Inc. v. Commission on Human

et 527 So. 2d 894, at 897, 898 5th DCA Accord, Coleman v.

Daytona Beach, Ocean Center Parking Garage, FCHR Order No. (September Gantz. et al. v. Zion's Hope, Inc.. d/b/a Holy Land Experience, FCHR Order No.


Filed September 8, 2016 4:45 PM Division of Administrative Hearings


(June 6, and Hall v. Villages of West Oaks HOA. FCHR Order No. 08-007 (January 14, 2008).

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge's findings of fact.


Conclusions of Law


We find the Administrative Law Judge's application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge's conclusions of law.


Exceptions


Petitioner filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's Recommended Order in a document entitled, "Exceptions to Recommended Order Dated June

Respondent filed a response to Petitioner's exceptions in a document entitled, "Response to Exceptions to Recommended Order."

Petitioner's exceptions essentially take issue with inferences drawn from the evidence presented.

As indicated, above, no transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge was filed with the Commission.

In the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge, the Commission is bound by the facts found in the Recommended Order, since there is no way for the Commission to the extent to which the facts found are supported by the testimony presented. See, e.g., v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., FCHR Order No. 07-054 (October 2007), Herring v. Department of Corrections, FCHR Order No. (February and Holloman v. Lee Wesley Restaurants,

Burger King, FCHR Order No. 14-041 (October 9, 2014).

With regard to findings of fact set out in Recommended Orders, the Administrative Procedure Act states, "The agency may not reject or modify the findings of fact unless the agency first detennines from a review of the entire record, and states with particularity in the order, that the findings of fact were not based on competent substantial evidence or that the proceedings on which the findings were based did not comply with the essential requirements of law [emphasis added]." Section )(1), Florida Statutes As indicated, above, in the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge, the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the Commission to consider. See, National Industries, Inc., supra. Accord, Hall, supra, Jones v. Suwannee County School Board, FCHR Order No. 06-088 (September 2006), Johnson v. Tree of Life, Inc.. FCHR Order No 05-087 (July 2005), Coleman, supra, and Gantz, supra.

Further, the Commission has stated, "It is well settled that it is the Administrative Law Judge's function 'to consider all of the evidence presented and reach ultimate conclusions of fact based on competent substantial evidence by resolving conflicts,


judging the credibility of witnesses and drawing inferences therefrom. If the evidence presented supports two inconsistent findings, it is the Administrative Law Judge's role to decide between them.' Beckton v. Department of Children and Family Services. 21 F.A.L.R. at (FCHR citing Maggio v. Martin Marietta

9 F.A.L.R. 2168, 2171 (FCHR 1986)." Ban v. Columbia Regional Medical Center. 22 F.A.L.R. at (FCHR Accord, Bowles v. Jackson County Hospital Corporation, FCHR Order No. (December 6, 2005) and Eaves v.

Central Florida Portfolio. LLC. FCHR Order No. -029 (March

In addition, it has been stated, "The ultimate question of the existence of discrimination is a question of fact." Florida Department of Community Affairs v. Bryant. 586 So. 2d at 1209 1s t DCA Accord, v. Bay County Board of County Commissioners, FCHR Order No. (March and Eaves, supra.

Petitioner's exceptions are rejected.


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Housing Discrimination Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure


DONE AND ORDERED this ,

FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:


Commissioner Tony Jenkins, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Jay Pichard; and

Commissioner Sandra Turner


this day of ,

in Tallahassee, Florida.


Clerk

Commission on Human Relations 4075 Esplanade Way, Room Tallahassee, FL 32399

(850)488-7082


Copies furnished to:


Valerie Walters

c/o Cindy Hill, Esq. Hill Law

456 South Trail

Osprey, FL 34229


Valerie Walters

c/o Gary Parker, Esq. Legal Aid of Manasota 1900 Main Street, Ste. 302

Sarasota, FL 34236


Pine Run Association, Inc. c/o Scott H. Jackman, Esq. Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A.

4301 West Boy Scout Blvd., Ste. 400 Tampa, FL 33607


Pine Run Association, Inc.

c/o Sharon S. Vander Esq. Sharon S. Vander Wulp, P.A.

Shamrock Blvd. Venice, FL 34293


Linzie F. Bogan, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel


I HEREBY CERTIFY that a the foregoing has been mailed to the above


Clerk of the Commission

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 16-001076
Issue Date Proceedings
Nov. 01, 2016 Application for Determination of Civil Indigent Status filed. 
 Confidential document; not available for viewing.
Oct. 07, 2016 Notice of Administrative Appeal filed.
Sep. 08, 2016 Agency Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from a Discriminatory Housing Practice filed.
Sep. 08, 2016 Exceptions to Recommended Order Dated June 17, 2016 filed.
Jul. 13, 2016 Response to Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
Jul. 05, 2016 Exceptions to Recommended Order Dated June 17, 2016 filed.
Jun. 20, 2016 Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding Respondent's Exhibits, which were not admited into evidence to Respondent.
Jun. 20, 2016 Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding Petitioner's Exhibits, which were not admitted into evidence to Petitioner.
Jun. 17, 2016 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jun. 17, 2016 Recommended Order (hearing held May 3, 2016). CASE CLOSED.
May 24, 2016 (Respondent's Proposed) Recommended Final Order filed.
May 23, 2016 (Petitioner's Proposed) Recommended Order filed.
May 03, 2016 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
May 02, 2016 Petitioner's Consent to Representation by Emeritus Attorney filed.
May 02, 2016 Petitioner's (Proposed) Supplemental Exhibit List filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
Apr. 29, 2016 Petitioner's Supplemental Exhibit List filed.
Apr. 29, 2016 Notice of Filing filed.
Apr. 29, 2016 Affidavit of Service (Jon Buehler) filed.
Apr. 26, 2016 Pre-hearing Statement filed.
Apr. 26, 2016 Respondent's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
Apr. 25, 2016 Notice of Filing Respondent's Proposed Exhibits filed.
Apr. 25, 2016 Respondent's Exhibit List filed.
Apr. 25, 2016 Notice of Filing (Petitioner's Exhibit List; proposed exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
Apr. 22, 2016 Petitioner's Exhibit List filed.
Apr. 22, 2016 Notice of Filing filed.
Apr. 21, 2016 Petitioner's Witness List filed.
Apr. 13, 2016 Respondent's Witness List filed.
Apr. 13, 2016 Petitioner's Memorandum of Law filed.
Apr. 13, 2016 Certified Return Receipt received this date from the U.S. Postal Service.
Apr. 06, 2016 Response to Petitioner's Request for Production filed.
Mar. 30, 2016 Response to Petitioner's Request for Admissions filed.
Mar. 14, 2016 Certified Return Receipt received this date from the U.S. Postal Service.
Mar. 10, 2016 Court Reporter Request filed.
Mar. 09, 2016 Certified Mail Receipts stamped this date by the U.S. Postal Service.
Mar. 09, 2016 Notice of Appearance (Scott Jackman) filed.
Mar. 09, 2016 Amended Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for May 3, 2016; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa and Tallahassee, FL; amended as to Date of Hearing).
Mar. 09, 2016 Respondent's Response to Initial Order filed.
Mar. 08, 2016 Petitioner's Request for Admission filed.
Mar. 08, 2016 Petitioner's Request for Production filed.
Mar. 07, 2016 Certified Mail Receipts stamped this date by the U.S. Postal Service.
Mar. 07, 2016 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Mar. 07, 2016 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for March 31, 2016; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa and Tallahassee, FL).
Mar. 03, 2016 Petitioner's Response to Initial Order filed.
Feb. 24, 2016 Initial Order.
Feb. 24, 2016 Housing Discrimination Complaint filed.
Feb. 24, 2016 Notice of Determination of No Cause filed.
Feb. 24, 2016 Determination filed.
Feb. 24, 2016 Petition for Relief filed.
Feb. 24, 2016 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.

Orders for Case No: 16-001076
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 08, 2016 Agency Final Order
Jun. 17, 2016 Recommended Order Petitioner failed to meet her burden of proving that Respondent discriminated against her in violation of the Fair Housing Act.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer