Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

THE BARKMORE RESORT vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 20-004115 (2020)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 20-004115 Visitors: 75
Petitioner: THE BARKMORE RESORT
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Judges: JOHN D. C. NEWTON, II
Agency: Department of Transportation
Locations: Land O Lakes, Florida
Filed: Sep. 16, 2020
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, January 29, 2021.

Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2024
Summary: Is it necessary for Respondent, the Department of Transportation (DOT), to close the southern driveway of the property of Petitioner, Barkmore Resort, Inc. (Barkmore)? If the driveway is closed, will the Barkmore property have reasonable access to the State Highway System?DOT proved closing 1 of 2 driveways as part of a significant highway reconstruction project was necessary and that the remaining driveway provided reasonable access to the state highway system.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

THE BARKMORE RESORT,


Petitioner,


vs.


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,


Respondent.

/

Case No. 20-4115



RECOMMENDED ORDER

Administrative Law Judge John D. C. Newton, II, of the Division of Administrative Hearings (Division) heard this case by Zoom conference on December 8, 2020, with locations in Tallahassee, Bartow, and Land O' Lakes, Florida.

APPEARANCES

For Petitioner: Stephanie N. Carver, pro se

The Barkmore Resort

10125 Land O' Lakes Boulevard Land O' Lakes, Florida 34638


For Respondent: Richard E. Shine, Esquire

Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

  1. Is it necessary for Respondent, the Department of Transportation (DOT), to close the southern driveway of the property of Petitioner, Barkmore Resort, Inc. (Barkmore)?

  2. If the driveway is closed, will the Barkmore property have reasonable access to the State Highway System?


    PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

    DOT sent Barkmore a Notice of Intended Department Action advising that, as part of a project converting a part of State Road 45 (SR 45) (also known as Land O' Lakes Blvd. or US 41) to a four-lane divided roadway, DOT intended to close Barkmore's southern driveway entering SR 45 and widen the northern one. Barkmore requested a formal administrative hearing to dispute DOT's decision. The only grounds for rejecting DOT's proposed action stated in the request for hearing were that if the driveway were closed, "[t]here will be no way to access the electric poles, multiple septic tanks, and propane tank if the South driveway is closed" and the business would become "inoperable."


    DOT referred the dispute to the Division on September 16, 2020, for conduct of the requested hearing. The undersigned conducted the hearing December 8, 2020. DOT presented testimony from Tammy Kreisle, P.E., Construction Engineer, and Ken Muzyk, P.E. Exhibits 1 (limited purpose) through 11 were admitted into evidence on behalf of DOT. Stephanie N. Carver, owner and president of Barkmore, testified for Barkmore, presenting eight lines of testimony. Barkmore did not offer exhibits. Both parties were advised of their right to submit proposed recommended orders. The Hearing Transcript was filed January 4, 2021. DOT timely filed a proposed recommended order, which has been considered in preparation of this Recommended Order. Barkmore did not file a proposed recommended order.


    FINDINGS OF FACT

    1. Barkmore is located at 10125 Land O' Lakes Boulevard (SR 45), Land O' Lakes, Florida. The Barkmore property is a single parcel consisting of three lots with commercial operations for Barkmore Resort Kennel and a recreational vehicle and boat storage facility.


    2. The property's two driveways connect to SR 45. The northern driveway connects to the Barkmore parking lot and is aligned with the fence gate for the storage area. At some point in the past, the southern driveway had a cross-connection to the parking lot. It does not now. It currently consists of dirt and grass and terminates at a locked gate on the southern run of Barkmore’s fence. Images of the southern driveway do not show signs of recent use. Currently the driveways are "grandfathered" in and not subject to existing driveway requirements.

    3. SR 45 is part of Florida’s highway system. DOT regulates access to the state highway system to ensure safe, efficient, and effective maintenance and operation of the roads. Several statutes and rules govern DOT's activities, including when and how it can change a property's access to the system.

    4. DOT is planning a roadway widening project that will include reconstructing SR 45 into a four-lane roadway. This will permit a 55 mile an hour speed limit. The SR 45 project's approximate length is 2.7 miles reaching from north of Connerton Boulevard to south of State Road 52. Barkmore’s property abuts that stretch of road. DOT intends for the project to improve road capacity, traffic flow, and safety. The project is a significant change to the roadway and roadway design.

    5. The project includes modifications and improvements to driveway connections along SR 45. It also provides for a shared-use path for vulnerable users, including bicyclists and pedestrians, along the east side of the project. The path, however, is on the opposite side of SR 45 from Barkmore. Barkmore's driveway is one of approximately 19 driveway modifications DOT proposes as part of the project.

    6. Barkmore's southern and northern driveways are 155 feet apart. Florida Administrative Code Rule 14-97.003 requires 660 feet between driveway connections. This requirement alleviates "driveway confusion" for


      drivers caused by driveways in close proximity to each other, like those of Barkmore. The fact that Barkmore's southern driveway terminates in a locked gate adds to the confusion for drivers.

    7. Every driveway creates a conflict point with vehicles and pedestrians traveling on the road to which the driveway connects. Limiting conflict points promotes better traffic movement and an increased level of safety and mobility for the highway system.

    8. Because of these safety and traffic flow considerations, DOT proposed modifying the Barkmore driveways to bring them into compliance with current requirements. DOT proposed elimination of the southern driveway and significant improvement of the northern one. The project will replace the northern driveway's dirt and gravel with asphalt. The project will increase the width of the northern driveway from 12 feet to 24 feet at the right-of-way line. The project also increases the opening, or throat, where the northern driveway connects to SR 45, to 70 feet. After the proposed changes, the northern driveway will provide reasonable and improved access to Barkmore’s property, including to the southern gate. After modification, the northern driveway will provide for adequate vehicle circulation into and out of the Barkmore property.

    9. There is no evidence to support the claim of the hearing request that, "[t]here will be no way to access the electric poles, multiple septic tanks, and propane tank if the South driveway is closed" and the business would become "inoperable."

    10. On August 2, 2019, DOT sent Barkmore a notice advising of DOT's intent to close Barkmore’s southern driveway and widen its northern driveway connecting Barkmore's property to the DOT right-of-way for State Road 45. The notice also advised Barkmore of its right to request an administrative hearing.

    11. DOT conducted a hearing on October 15, 2019, to receive public input, to learn how the project will affect access to businesses, and to hear public


      input about the project’s potential economic impact on the business

      community.


      CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

    12. Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes (2020)1, grant the Division jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this case.

    13. DOT is the state agency responsible for regulating access to the state highway system pursuant to sections 335.18 through 335.188, Florida Statutes.

    14. DOT initiated this action. Consequently, DOT bears the burden of proving the allegations of the Notice by a preponderance of the evidence. See Dep't of Transp. v. J.W.C. Co., 396 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

    15. Owners of property abutting a state highway have a right to reasonable access to the highway. But they do not have a right to unregulated access. DOT may restrict access connections so long as it permits reasonable access to an abutting state highway. § 335.181(2), Fla. Stat. DOT has broad discretionary authority to plan and construct roads. Dep't of Transp. v. Lopez-Torres, 526 So. 2d 674, 675 (Fla. 1988); § 334.044, Fla. Stat.

    16. Driveway connections on state roads must be permitted or "grandfathered." See § 335.1825, Fla. Stat.; Fla Admin. Code R. 14- 96.011(3)(a). DOT may modify a "grandfathered" connection, like Barkmore's, in conjunction with a DOT project like the improvements to SR 45. Modification is necessary if the unmodified connection would jeopardize public safety or negatively affect the operational characteristics of the state highway. Fla. Admin. Code R. 14-96.011(4)(b).

    17. Barkmore's two driveway connections would jeopardize public safety and negatively affect the operational characteristics of SR 45 if unchanged. DOT's proposal to close the southern driveway and significantly upgrade the


      1 All citations are to the 2020 compilation of the Florida Statutes unless noted otherwise.


      northern driveway preserves reasonable access to SR 45. The proposed modification is necessary and preserves Barkmore's access to SR 45.

    18. Section 335.199(3) requires DOT to hold at least one public hearing to receive input about a proposed project. DOT fulfilled this requirement.

    19. Florida Administrative Code Rule 14-96.011(3)(c) requires DOT to offer the property owner an opportunity to meet on site and consider documents and alternatives offered by the property owner. DOT complied with this requirement.

RECOMMENDATION

Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is recommended that Respondent, Department of Transportation, enter a final order approving the closure of the southern driveway of Petitioner, Barkmore Resort, Inc., and improvement of the northern driveway as part of the State Road 45 project.


DONE AND ENTERED this 29th day of January, 2021, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

JOHN D. C. NEWTON, II

Administrative Law Judge 1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675

www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the

Division of Administrative Hearings this 29th day of January, 2021.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Stephanie N. Carver The Barkmore Resort

10125 Land O' Lakes Boulevard Land O Lakes, Florida 34638


Amber Greene, Clerk of Agency Proceedings Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building

605 Suwannee Street, MS 58

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450


Sean Gellis, General Counsel Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building

605 Suwannee Street, MS 58

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450


Richard E. Shine, Esquire Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399


Kevin J. Thibault, P.E., Secretary Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building

605 Suwannee Street, MS 57

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS

All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 20-004115
Issue Date Proceedings
Mar. 05, 2021 Agency Final Order filed.
Jan. 29, 2021 Recommended Order (hearing held December 8, 2020). CASE CLOSED.
Jan. 29, 2021 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jan. 15, 2021 Florida Department of Transportation's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jan. 05, 2021 Notice of Filing Transcript.
Jan. 05, 2021 Transcript of Proceedings (not available for viewing) filed.
Dec. 08, 2020 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Dec. 01, 2020 Notice of Filing (Respondent's Proposed Exhibits, not available for viewing) filed .
Dec. 01, 2020 Notice of Filing (Respondent's Exhibits) filed.
Dec. 01, 2020 CASE STATUS: Pre-Hearing Conference Held.
Dec. 01, 2020 Amended Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (pre-hearing conference set for December 1, 2020; 2:30 p.m., Eastern Time).
Oct. 23, 2020 Amended Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (pre-hearing conference set for November 30, 2020; 3:00 p.m., Eastern Time).
Oct. 08, 2020 Second Amended Notice of Hearing by Zoom Conference (hearing set for December 8, 2020; 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time).
Oct. 07, 2020 Joint Request to Move Hearing Date filed.
Oct. 07, 2020 Amended Notice of Hearing by Zoom Conference (hearing set for November 20, 2020; 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time; Land O Lakes; amended as to Date).
Sep. 29, 2020 Notice of Telephonic Pre-hearing Conference (set for November 5, 2020; 3:00 p.m., Eastern Time).
Sep. 29, 2020 Notice of Hearing by Zoom Conference (hearing set for November 18, 2020; 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time; Land O Lakes).
Sep. 23, 2020 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Sep. 16, 2020 Initial Order.
Sep. 16, 2020 Notice of Intended Department Action filed.
Sep. 16, 2020 Request for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
Sep. 16, 2020 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 20-004115
Issue Date Document Summary
Mar. 03, 2021 Agency Final Order
Jan. 29, 2021 Recommended Order DOT proved closing 1 of 2 driveways as part of a significant highway reconstruction project was necessary and that the remaining driveway provided reasonable access to the state highway system.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer