Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Darryl Blankenship v. Michelle Phelps, 86-4116 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 86-4116 Visitors: 79
Filed: Aug. 05, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 825 F.2d 410 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Darryl BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michelle PHELPS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 86-4116 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 5, 1987. ORDER Before ENGEL, MERRITT and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judg
More

825 F.2d 410

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Darryl BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michelle PHELPS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 86-4116

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 5, 1987.

ORDER

Before ENGEL, MERRITT and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges.

1

This case is before the court upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. The appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and plaintiff's informal brief, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

Plaintiff's complaint was properly dismissed for failure to state an actionable claim under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 because plaintiff failed to allege that the defendant acted under color of state law. Gomez v. Toledo, 446 U.S. 635, 640 (1980). On appeal, plaintiff asks that certain charges brought against him by defendant be removed from his record. However, such relief is available in federal court only in an action for habeas corpus relief. Further, federal habeas corpus relief is not available until all remedies available to plaintiff in the state courts have been exhausted. Keener v. Ridenour, 594 F.2d 581, 584 (6th Cir. 1979); 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(c).

3

Therefore, the judgment of the district court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(4), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is also hereby denied.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer