July 23, 1996
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 96-1294
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
ALEJANDRO DE JESUS GRANADA,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Irma R. Valldejuli on brief for appellant. __________________
Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Warren Vazquez and Nelson _____________ ______________ ______
Perez-Sosa, Assistant United States Attorneys, and Jose A. Quiles- __________ ________________
Espinosa, Senior Litigation Counsel, on brief for appellee. ________
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. Alejandro De Jesus Granada appeals his __________
sentence on two grounds. We affirm.
1. Role in the offense. Appellant argues that the ___________________
district court erred in failing to grant his request for a
two-level reduction in the offense level based upon his minor
role in the offense, pursuant to U.S.S.G. 3B1.2. The plea
agreement entered between appellant and the government
expressly provided that, beyond the adjustment for acceptance
of responsibility, "no further adjustments to the defendant's
base offense level shall be made." It might therefore be
argued that appellant waived his right to request an
adjustment for his role in the offense, but there is some
difference among the circuits on when and whether such
stipulations are binding on the district court and we have
not resolved this issue. Compare United States v. Isirov, _______ _____________ ______
996 F.2d 183, 186-87 (7th Cir. 1993), with United States v. ______________
Long, 77 F.3d 1060, 1061 (8th Cir. 1996). ____
In all events, Granada was convicted of importing a
specific shipment of heroin. He is the one who did the
importing and while there is some indication that someone
else furnished him with the drugs, there is almost nothing to
indicate that his role in this importation was minor. Given
that the burden was on Granada to show that he was entitled
to the downward adjustment, the district court did not err in
its conclusion that the adjustment was unwarranted.
-2-
2. Departure Pursuant to U.S.S.G. 5K2.0. ____________________________________________
Appellant contends that the district court erred in failing
to depart downward under U.S.S.G. 5K2.0, on account of his
substantial assistance to the government, notwithstanding
that the government did not move for a departure pursuant to
5K1.1. "It is by now axiomatic that a criminal defendant
cannot ground an appeal on a sentencing court's discretionary
decision not to depart below the guideline sentencing range."
United States v. Pierro, 32 F.3d 611, 619 (1st Cir. 1994). _____________ ______
In his brief, appellant does not argue that the
district court misunderstood its legal authority to depart.
The transcript of the sentencing hearing does not indicate
that the court suffered from such a misunderstanding.
Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the
sentencing court's discretionary decision not to depart.
3. Pro Se Motion to Supplement Appellate Record. _____________________________________________
Appellant filed a pro se motion with this court seeking to ___ __
supplement the record by adding a letter from a prison
psychologist. In his motion, Granada suggests that the letter
calls into question the validity of his guilty plea. The
letter was never before the district court. Nor has Granada
raised the issue of the validity of his guilty plea in
district court. "It is a bedrock rule that when a party has
not presented an argument to the district court, she may not
-3-
unveil it in the court of appeals." United States v. Slade, ______________ _____
980 F.2d 27, 30 (1st Cir. 1992).
Appellant's sentence is affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1. ________ ___
Appellant's pro se motion to supplement the record on appeal ___ __
is denied. ______
-4-