Filed: May 16, 1983
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 707 F.2d 1013 CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. Secretary Raymond DONOVAN, United States Department of Labor, et al., Appellees. No. 82-7291. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 16, 1983. Jayne W. Williams, Oakland, Cal., for petitioners. Harry Sheinfeld, Washington, D.C., for respondents. Petition on Review from the United States Department of Labor. Before TRASK, KENNEDY, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF MANDATE 1 Upon due con
Summary: 707 F.2d 1013 CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. Secretary Raymond DONOVAN, United States Department of Labor, et al., Appellees. No. 82-7291. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 16, 1983. Jayne W. Williams, Oakland, Cal., for petitioners. Harry Sheinfeld, Washington, D.C., for respondents. Petition on Review from the United States Department of Labor. Before TRASK, KENNEDY, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF MANDATE 1 Upon due cons..
More
707 F.2d 1013
CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant,
v.
Secretary Raymond DONOVAN, United States Department of
Labor, et al., Appellees.
No. 82-7291.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 16, 1983.
Jayne W. Williams, Oakland, Cal., for petitioners.
Harry Sheinfeld, Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Petition on Review from the United States Department of Labor.
Before TRASK, KENNEDY, and POOLE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF MANDATE
1
Upon due consideration of the Secretary's motion for clarification, 703 F.2d 1104, and the response of the City, and upon further consideration of the stipulation between the parties on file herein, it is ordered that the mandate in this case shall be as follows:
2
The Secretary's finding of noncompliance with CETA requirements is affirmed. The City of Oakland will repay the full amount of the grant to the Secretary in accordance with the terms of the stipulation between the parties. No further administrative proceedings will be required.
