Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Remo Benigni, Dba the Silver Fox v. City of Hemet Roger Miller Jesse Pease Scott Jernigan, 87-5622 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 87-5622 Visitors: 41
Filed: Jul. 31, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 882 F.2d 356 Remo BENIGNI, dba The Silver Fox, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF HEMET; Roger Miller; Jesse Pease; Scott Jernigan, Defendants-Appellants. No. 87-5622. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 31, 1989. Prior report: 879 F.2d 473 . Before TANG, BOOCHEVER and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 An opinion was originally filed on August 15, 1988 and was published at 853 F.2d 1519 . 2 The appellants filed a petition for rehearing on August 29, 1988. 3 An amended opinion, in which
More

882 F.2d 356

Remo BENIGNI, dba The Silver Fox, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF HEMET; Roger Miller; Jesse Pease; Scott Jernigan,
Defendants-Appellants.

No. 87-5622.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

July 31, 1989.

Prior report: 879 F.2d 473.

Before TANG, BOOCHEVER and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

An opinion was originally filed on August 15, 1988 and was published at 853 F.2d 1519.

2

The appellants filed a petition for rehearing on August 29, 1988.

3

An amended opinion, in which Judge Boochever filed a concurrence, was filed December 2, 1988; this opinion was subsequently withdrawn from publication in the Federal Reporter.

4

After the appellee filed a response to the petition for rehearing at the court's request, a second amended opinion, captioned "Amended Opinion," was filed February 14, 1989 and was published at 868 F.2d 307. A final amended opinion, captioned "Second Amended Opinion," was filed June 15, 1989. 879 F.2d 473.

5

The panel as constituted above has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Tang and Norris reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judge Boochever so recommends.

6

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).

7

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer