Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Action for Children's Television v. Federal Communications Commission, United States of America, 93-1092 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Number: 93-1092 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 16, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 15 F.3d 186 304 U.S.App.D.C. 367 ACTION FOR CHILDREN'S TELEVISION, et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, United States of America, Respondents. Nos. 93-1092, 93-1100. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Feb. 16, 1994. Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge; WALD, EDWARDS, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM. 1 Respondents' Suggestion For Rehearing In Banc and the response thereto have been
More

15 F.3d 186

304 U.S.App.D.C. 367

ACTION FOR CHILDREN'S TELEVISION, et al., Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, United States of America,
Respondents.

Nos. 93-1092, 93-1100.

United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 16, 1994.

Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge; WALD, EDWARDS, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Respondents' Suggestion For Rehearing In Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

2

ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the suggestion is granted and these cases will be reheard by the court sitting in banc. It is

3

FURTHER ORDERED, by the court in banc, that the judgment filed herein on November 23, 1993 be, 11 F.3d 170, and the same hereby is, vacated.

4

A future order will govern further proceedings.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer