Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs. GERALD W. CONRAD, D/B/A SPANISH GRANTS, INC., 77-002179 (1977)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 77-002179 Visitors: 23
Judges: JAMES E. BRADWELL
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 1990
Summary: Recommend $300 administrative fine and revocation for diversion.
77-2179.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY, ) LICENSING BOARD, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 77-2179

)

GERALD W. CONRAD d/b/a, )

SPANISH GRANTS, INC., )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Hearing Officer, James E. Bradwell, held a public hearing in this case on April 12, 1978, in Tampa, Florida.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Barry S. Sinoff, Esquire

1010 Blackstone Building

Jacksonville, Florida 32202


For Respondent: John Turnbull, Esquire

Wightman, Rowe, Weidemeyer, Jones and Turnbull

319 South Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33516


The Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board (herein sometimes called "Board"), by its Administrative Complaint filed October 17, 1977, seeks to revoke the registered building contractor's license of Gerald W. Conrad, d/b/a Spanish Grants, Inc., (herein sometimes called "Respondent") based on conduct which will be set forth hereinafter in detail which allegedly constitutes violations of Chapter 468.112(2)(a) and (a) F.S. In addition to the Board's efforts seeking to revoke the Respondent's registered building contractor's license, it also seeks to impose a $300.00 administrative fine against Respondent. In addition to its general denial of the complaint allegations, the Respondent attacked the sufficiency of the complaint by contending that the charging statutes were overly broad and should be struck down as being void due to "vagueness".


FINDINGS OF FACT


Based on the testimony of the witnesses and their demeanor while testifying, the arguments of counsel and the entire record compiled herein, I make the following:

  1. The Respondent, Gerald W. Conrad, is a registered building contractor who holds license No. RB 0016374. The projects involved herein are situated in Pinellas County, Florida. Pinellas County has a local Construction Industry Licensing Board which declined to prosecute this matter when it was referred to the local board for its determination as to whether or not any disciplinary action should be taken against the Respondent, Gerald W. Conrad.


  2. Jerry Taylor, an investigator with the Board since approximately February of 1977, investigated the Board records as they relate to the Respondent. Evidence reveals that on May 1, 1977, Respondent Conrad d/b/a Spanish Grants, Inc., effected a license renewal and during July of 1977, Respondent requested and was granted permission to change the contracting entity involved herein from a corporate entity to a sole proprietorship.


  3. Peter M. Lipman, the Executive Director of the Pinellas County Construction Licensing Board, testified that the complaint allegations concerning the Respondent were presented to the Board informally and that the Board, pursuant to its rules and regulations, conducted a preliminary inquiry into the matter and decided to defer to the jurisdiction of the State Board. Lipman testified that he, as the official custodian of the local Board records, found no evidence of any registration or certification of Respondent with the local Board either as an individual or as a corporate entity.


  4. Jack Harris and his spouse, on March 14, 1977, entered into a contract with the Respondent to construct a home for a price of $44,000.00. On March 15, 1977, Harris tendered a $1,000.00 deposit to a Mr. Charles Pitcock, Sales Director for the Respondent, as security for the land on which the home was to be constructed. (See Petitioner's Exhibit No. 2.)


  5. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Harris visited the local offices of First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Tarpon Springs and arranged permanent financing. According to the terms of the agreements entered into with the Respondent, approximately $30,000.00 was to be given the contractor at the completion of construction, with approximately $12,000.00 to be financed.

    During the early days of April, 1977, Mr. Harris received a call from Respondent asking that approximately $7,800.00 be paid in order to commence the construction of his home. The money was forwarded to Respondent on April 8, as requested. On May 18, the Harrises received a request from Respondent for

    $7,200.00 for nest connected with the pouring of the slab and for plumbing, which request was honored on May 24. On May 28, Respondent requested an additional $7,000.00 for payments toward the construction costs in erecting the lintels. On June 1, 1977, the Harrises sent Respondent a check for $7,000.00, as requested. The Harrises were then living in Rego Park, New York, and were making efforts to retire to the home that the Respondent was constructing in Pinellas County, Florida. On June 1, the Harrises received a letter from Respondent's Sales Director (Pitcock) who advised that he was leaving the Respondent's employ. Mr. Pitcock also outlined in that letter several reminders and recommendations to the Harrises, such as continual monitoring of the construction progress; advising them to make their homeowner's insurance effective when exterior walls were erected; confirming closing dates with builders before appearing for same and a general offer to be of service when he could provide same. (See Petitioner's Exhibit No. 3.) All payments to Respondent from the Harrises were by check. (See petitioner's Composite Exhibit No. 4.) At about this same time, the Harrises became concerned about their reports of the lack of progress toward the construction of their home and Mr.

    Harris made a trip to Pinellas County from New York. Mr. Harris was able to arrange a meeting with Gerald Conrad and William Walker, Respondent's President

    and Vice President respectively. This meeting centered around the Harrises' inability to obtain a deed to the property they had purchased. On June 13, the Harrises filed an official complaint with a Mr. Anderson of the Consumer Affairs Department of Pinellas County. After the Harrises had paid approximately

    $15,000.00 toward the purchase price of their home and was unable to get a clear deed to the property, they ceased making further payments and Respondent has not refunded their money. The house was being constructed in a subdivision known as Oakleaf Village on Lot. 24, Block K, Oakleaf Village Unit 6. Further developments revealed that on October 26, 1976, the Respondent by its President, Gerald W. Conrad, executed a warranty deed to Richard G. and Kathleen Gushwa, that was the same property which the Harrises had agreed to purchase from the Respondent. (See Petitioner's Exhibit No. 6.) Richard Gushwa, an employee of the City of Clearwater, testified that he contracted with the Respondent to construct him a home for a total purchase price of $44,500.00. Initially the Gushwas paid the Respondent a $200.00 binder and thereafter an $8,400.00 start- up fee. The $8,400.00 was paid on October 25, 1976. When construction had not commenced as scheduled during January, 1977, the Gushwas arranged a meeting with their attorney and Messrs. Conrad and Walker, at which time the Respondent requested an additional $3,500.00 to construct the home which the Gushwas had contracted for in October of 1976. The parties were unable to resolve their differences and the matter ended, with the Gushwas paying no more money toward the contract price. During late April of 1977, Mr. Gushwa noticed a building permit erected on his property and later learned that the house was being constructed for the Harrises. During the first week of April, 1978, the Gushwas were able to sell the lot and abandoned building "as is" to Thomas and Sandra Hanson for $10,500.00. (See Petitioner's Exhibits Nos. 6 and 8.)


  6. On April 12, 1977, the Respondent, Richard A. and Helen Cope entered into a contractual agreement whereby the Copes agreed to pay Respondent

    $65,700.00 for a home to be erected in Oakleaf Village subdivision in Pinellas County, Florida. (See Petitioner's Exhibit No. 9.) The Copes paid $15,000.00 for the lot and to date, no improvements have been made. Additionally, the Copes have been unable to receive a deed to their property nor has Respondent refunded their monies.


  7. Bernard and Mary Koser entered into an agreement with the Respondent for the construction of a home to be built in Oakleaf Village for a total purchase price of $55,000.00. On March 21, 1977, the Kosers paid the Respondent, Spanish Grants, Inc., $11,600.00 and to date, the Kosers too have been unable to obtain a refund of these monies which were paid to Respondent nor has the property been deeded to them. (See Petitioner's Exhibits Nos. 10 and 11.)


  8. On November 29, 1976, Joseph T. and Patricia Vollaro entered into a contract with Spanish Grants, Inc., for a home to be constructed for $51,460.00. The home was erected on property owned by a Mr. Dreher. The Vollaros purchased the land from the Drehers for a price of $8,080.00. Additionally, the Vollaros paid approximately $2,485.00 over and above the amounts paid for the lot and the price they contracted for their home. (See Petitioner's Exhibits Nos. 11 and 12.)


  9. Evidence also reveals that the Respondent, Gerald W. Conrad, pulled two permits for Lot 24, Block K of the Oakleaf Village subdivision. (See Petitioner's Composite Exhibits Nos. 3 and 14.)

    RESPONDENT'S DEFENSE


  10. Essentially, the Respondent, through counsel, attacked the alleged vagueness and uncertainty of Chapter 468.112(e), F.S. Finally, the Respondent considered the acts here complained of against him to be regrettable and that, if possible, he would "turn back the clock".


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  11. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties to this action. Chapter 120.57(1), F.S.


  12. The parties were noticed pursuant to notice provisions of Chaoter 120,

    F.S.


  13. The authority of the Board is derived from Chapter 468, F.S.


  14. Competent and substantial evidence was offered to establish that the

    Respondent, Gerald W. Conrad, individually and d/b/a Spanish Grants, Inc., by acts and conduct as set forth hereinabove in detail which amounts to a diversion of funds within the meaning of Chapter 468.112(2)(e), F.S.


  15. Competent and substantial evidence was offered to establish that the Respondent by the acts and conduct set forth hereinabove amounts to conduct violative of Chapter 468.112(2)(a), F.S.


RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing findings and conclusions of law, it is hereby RECOMMENDED:

  1. That the Respondent's registered building contractor's license No. RB 0016374 be revoked.


  2. That the Respondent pay the Board an administrative fine of $300.00.


RECOMMENDED this 27th of July, 1978, in Tallahassee, Florida.


JAMES E. BRADWELL, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

(904) 488-9675


COPIES FURNISHED:


Barry S. Sinoff, Esquire 1010 Blackstone Building

233 East Bay Street Jacksonville, Florida 32202

John Turnbull, Esquire

319 South Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33516


Mr. C. H. Hoskinson

Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board

Post Office Box 8621 Jacksonville, Florida 32211


Mr. J. K. Linnan Executive Director

Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board

Post Office Box 8621 Jacksonville, Florida 32211


Docket for Case No: 77-002179
Issue Date Proceedings
Dec. 04, 1990 Final Order filed.
Jul. 27, 1978 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 77-002179
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 08, 1978 Agency Final Order
Jul. 27, 1978 Recommended Order Recommend $300 administrative fine and revocation for diversion.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer