Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. BLUE WATERS MOTEL AND CASIMIR AND IRENE MISKA, 79-000990 (1979)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 79-000990 Visitors: 22
Judges: STEPHEN F. DEAN
Agency: Department of Transportation
Latest Update: May 04, 1982
Summary: Are the Respondents in violation of Section 479.11(6), Florida Statutes, by owning or maintaining an outdoor advertising sign in the Department of Transportation's right-of-way?Respondent's signs are in violation of the set-back requirement and should be removed.
79-0990.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 79-990T

)

BLUE WATERS MOTEL, and )

CASIMIR and IRENE MISKA, )

)

Respondents. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


This case was heard pursuant to notice on March 30, 1982, in Marathon, Monroe County, Florida, by Stephen F. Dean, assigned Hearing Officer of the Division of Administrative Hearings. This case began with the filing of a Notice of Violation by the Department of Transportation alleging that Respondents were in violation of Section 479.11, Florida Statutes.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Charles G. Gardner, Esquire

Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301


For Respondents: Did not appear and was not represented ISSUE

Are the Respondents in violation of Section 479.11(6), Florida Statutes, by owning or maintaining an outdoor advertising sign in the Department of Transportation's right-of-way?


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Two signs advertising Blue Waters Motel and located in the vicinity of said motel are located in the right-of-way of Highway US 1.


  2. The location of these signs was fixed by a survey conducted by a Florida registered land surveyor with reference to official Department of Transportation right-of-way maps developed from the official court records of property ownership.


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  3. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction to hear this cause and enter this Recommended Order pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes. The Department of Transportation is charged with the regulation of

    outdoor advertising signs and regulation of the right-of-way of state roads by Chapter 479, Florida Statutes.


  4. Section 479.11(6), Florida Statutes, provides that no advertising sign shall be upon any right-of-way of any state- maintained road. The evidence presented shows that two advertising signs advertising Blue Waters Motel and located in the vicinity of said motel are located within the right-of-way of Highway US 1. Both signs are in violation of Section 479.11(6), Florida Statutes.


RECOMMENDATION


Having shown the subject signs to be in violation of Section 479.11(6), Florida Statutes, the Department of Transportation should give the owner of the signs 30 days to remove the signs. If the signs are not removed within that time period, the Department should remove the signs from its right-of-way.


DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of April, 1982, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


STEPHEN F. DEAN, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building

2009 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

(904) 488-9675


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 8th day of April, 1982.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Charles G. Gardner, Esquire Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301


Ms. Jane Cerchio

c/o Cerchio Drive and Rifle Camp Road

West Paterson, New Jersey 07424 and

c/o Blue Waters Motel

222 Overseas Highway, MM48 Marathon, Florida 33050


Paul N. Pappas, Secretary Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301


Docket for Case No: 79-000990
Issue Date Proceedings
May 04, 1982 Final Order filed.
Apr. 08, 1982 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 79-000990
Issue Date Document Summary
Apr. 30, 1982 Agency Final Order
Apr. 08, 1982 Recommended Order Respondent's signs are in violation of the set-back requirement and should be removed.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer