STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

BILLY LEE BROWN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 88-1323

)

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND )

REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, )

)

Respondent. )

) BILLY LEE BROWN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 88-1324

)

TINA L. KRUEGER and STATE OF )

FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH )

AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, )

)

Respondents. )

)

RECOMMENDED ORDER

Pursuant to notice, a final hearing was held in these consolidated cases on July 21, 1988, in Jacksonville, Florida, before Jose A. Diez-Arguelles, a hearing officer with the Division of Administrative Hearings.

APPEARANCES

FOR PETITIONER: Billy Lee Brown, pro se

3490 Lannie Road

Jacksonville, Florida 32201

FOR RESPONDENT: Warren J. Schulman, Esquire

331 East Union Street, Suite 1 Jacksonville, Florida 32202

BACKGROUND

These cases deal with the proposed interception by Respondent of Petitioners Federal Income Tax refund for the purpose of applying the refund towards overdue child support payments owed by Petitioner.

At the hearing, Petitioner testified on his own behalf. Respondent offered the testimony of Petitioner and offered four exhibits which were admitted into evidence.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Case No. 88-1323

1. On November 10, 1986, the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida, entered an order finding Petitioner to be in arrears in child support payments in the amount of $3,099.30.

   
   

2. As of July 21, 1988, Petitioner's arrearage for his child support payments was $2,430.71,

   
   

   Case No. 88-1324

   
   

3. On November 26, 1986, the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida, entered an order finding Petitioner to be in arrears in child support payments in the amount of $665.00. Also, the court determined that Petitioner owed the State of Florida $3,082.00 as a public assistance obligation which had been previously established by the court.

   
   

4. As of July 21, 1988, Petitioner was in arrears in the amount of

   $3,432.01 in his child support payments and in the public assistance obligation.

   
   

   Petitioner's Case

   
   

5. Mr. Brown is currently making all the payments he is required to make under both court orders. He admits he owes the amount at issue in this case, although he believes there may be minor discrepancies in the records and he plans to pursue this with the agency responsible for record keeping.

   
   

   ISSUE

   
   

6. Whether Petitioner's Federal Income Tax refund should be intercepted by Respondent?

   
   

   CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

   
   

7. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject matter of, this case. Section 120.57(1), Fla. Stat.

   
   

8. Title IV-D of the Social Security Act authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to withhold from an individual's Federal tax refund an amount equal to that individual's past-due child support obligation. 42 USCS sec. 664. The amount to be withheld is determined by the State agency administering the child- support program and includes amounts which the State has agreed to collect on behalf of others and amounts which have been assigned to the State because the State has been paying support on behalf of a child. Id. Amounts so withheld are then sent to the State agency for distribution to or on behalf of the child to whom the support is owed. Id. Respondent is the state agency responsible for administering the child support enforcement program in Florida. Section 409.1557, Fla. Stat.

   
   

9. Prior to notifying the Secretary of the Treasury that an individual owes past-due support, the State must send a notice to the individual informing the individual of the steps which may be taken to challenge the State's determination that past-due support is due or to challenge the amount of such past-due support. 42 USCS sec. 664.

10. Petitioner does not challenge that he owes past-due child support, nor is Petitioner challenging the procedures followed by Respondent in intercepting his tax refund. Petitioner's concerns at the hearing were in the nature of finding out the procedures which were being followed.

RECOMMENDATION

Therefore, based upon the foregoing, it is

RECOMMENDED that Respondent issue a final order affirming the determination that Petitioner owes past-due support.

DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of August, 1988, in Tallahassee, Florida.

JOSE A. DIEZ-ARGUELLES

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building

2009 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550

(904) 488-9675

Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 24th day of August, 1988.

COPIES FURNISHED:

Billy Lee Brown 3490 Lannie Road

Jacksonville, Florida 32201

Warren J. Schulman, Esquire

331 East Union Street, Suite 1 Jacksonville, Florida 32202

Sam Power, Clerk Department of Health and

Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700

Gregory L. Coler, Secretary Department of Health and

Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700

Docket for Case No: 88-001323

Orders for Case No: 88-001323