STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
VIOLET M. METCALFE )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) CASE NO. 89-6342
)
STEPHEN N. WEIS, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
On February 6, 1990, a formal administrative hearing was held in this case in Tampa, Florida, before J. Lawrence Johnston, Hearing Officer, Division of Administrative Hearings.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: No Appearance
For Respondent: Stuart R. Cohen, Esquire
Barnett, Bolt Kirkwood
100 Twiggs Street Sixth Floor
Tampa, Florida 33602 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
The issue in this case was to have been whether the Petition for Relief, alleging age and sex discrimination, should be granted. However, due to procedural irregularities, it was not at all clear who was supposed to be the party Respondent. See Preliminary Statement, below. 1/
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Apparent procedural irregularities in the handling of this case before the Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR) has caused considerable confusion among the parties in interest and the Hearing Officer as to the identity of the party respondent. According to the papers the FCHR referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH), the Petitioner named the "Floridan Hotel" as the Respondent on the original FCHR "Charge of Discrimination" form. For an undisclosed reason, the FCHR investigated the Charge of Discrimination against "Steve Weis Realty, Inc., d/b/a The Floridan Hotel," as the Respondent, and entered a "Notice of Determination: Cause," on which the Respondent was referred to as "Steve Weis Realty, Inc., d/b/a The Floridan Hotel." The papers then disclose entry of a "Redetermination: Cause," in which the name of the Respondent is changed to "Floridan Partners, d/b/a The Floridan Hotel," and Steve Weis [sic) Realty, Inc.'s, request to be removed as a party Respondent in this case is granted." After this "Redetermination: Cause," and the apparent failure of conciliation, the Petitioner filed her Petition for Relief, which
again changed the name of the Respondent, this time to "Stephen N. Weis." The FCHR referred this Petition for Relief to DOAH without any action or even comment directed to this change, and without any explanation of the earlier changes, in the identity of the party Respondent. Moreover, again without explanation, on its "Transmittal of Petition," the FCHR changed the name of the Respondent back to "The Floridan Hotel," the Respondent named on the original Charge of Discrimination. As a result of these procedural irregularities, it was difficult for either the parties in interest or the Hearing Officer to determine who was supposed to be the Respondent. There would have been a serious question whether these apparent procedural irregularities, with the resulting confusion, would have constituted reversible error if the Petitioner had appeared to present a case.
FINDING OF FACT
The Petitioner did not appear at the final hearing and there was no evidence presented.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
The Petitioner had the burden of proving the discrimination alleged in the Petition for Relief. See Section 760.10, Florida Statutes (1989); Fla. Dept. of Transp. v. J. W. C., Co., Inc., 396 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Balino v. Dept. of Health and Rehab. Services, 348 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).
Based on the foregoing Finding of Fact and Conclusion of Law, it is recommended that the Florida Commission on Human Relations enter a final order dismissing the Petition for Relief in this case.
RECOMMENDED this 28th day of February, 1990, in Tallahassee, Florida.
J. LAWRENCE JOHNSTON Hearing Officer
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550
(904) 488-9675
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 28th day of February, 1990.
ENDNOTE
1/ See Preliminary Statement, below.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Violet M. Metcalfe
3706 North Tampa Street Tampa, Florida 33603
Stuart R. Cohen, Esquire Barnett, Bolt Kirkwood
100 Twiggs Street Sixth Floor
Tampa, Florida 33602
Donald A. Griffin Executive Director
Human Relations Commission
325 John Knox Road Building F, Suite 240
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1925
Dana Baird, Esquire General Counsel
Human Relations Commission
325 John Knox Road Building F, Suite 240
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1925
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Feb. 27, 1990 | Recommended Order (hearing held , 2013). CASE CLOSED. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Jul. 09, 1990 | Agency Final Order | |
Feb. 27, 1990 | Recommended Order | Complaint age and sex discrimination dismissed. Petitioner didn't appear and presented no evidence. Petitioner had burden of proof |